Specifically, the "slippery slope fallacy" is only a problem if you present just one data point and assume the end.
Similar to basic geometry, you need at least two points to draw a line (or a ray, in this case). The more points you have, the stronger your argument.
At this point, we've got a thousand data points that all match very closely with "Elite pedophiles want to fuck your kids, and are attempting to re-shape your society so you can't stop them." You're no longer assuming the end from a single action, but a consistent and organized pattern of action.
Specifically, the "slippery slope fallacy" is only a problem if you present just one data point and assume the end.
Similar to basic geometry, you need at least two points to draw a line (or a ray, in this case). The more points you have, the stronger your argument.
At this point, we've got a thousand data points that all match very closely with "Elite pedophiles want to fuck your kids, and are attempting to re-shape your society so you can't stop them." You're no longer assuming the end from a single action, but a consistent and organized pattern of action.