The issue is about how you framed it. I see it as death penalty advocacy.
If you had said some demographic of people should be executed on entry because of some innate inferiority about them, that's an issue with Rule 16.
If you had said that you would execute anyone who crosses the border, that's an issue with Rule 2.
But if you're saying that the government should execute everyone who crosses the border, simply as a matter of policy because you are an isolationist, then that's your immigration policy stance.
The issue is about how you framed it. I see it as death penalty advocacy.
If you had said some demographic of people should be executed on entry because of some innate inferiority about them, that's an issue with Rule 16.
If you had said that you would execute anyone who crosses the border, that's an issue with Rule 2.
But if you're saying that the government should execute everyone who crosses the border, simply as a matter of policy because you are an isolationist, then that's your immigration policy stance.