I can assure you that I've likely read much more than an overwhelming majority have on the topic. I'm well aware of mRNA's history, as well as the history of failures in attempting to make vaccines for coronoavirus's to begin with. My post history should make that clear. I'm even more aware of the adverse reactions being reported (or lack thereof), the potential risks of ADE, the toxic pathogenic spike protein, myocarditis, Bell's Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, the terrifying prospect of Marek's Disease, other protein related inflammation, reproductive issues, and so much more.
You seem to be the one lacking understanding of what I'm saying. I'm not saying they should put forth these ideas and spam headlines with them. Nuance does exist, you know? I'm speaking solely on the best way for them to gain compliance. I'm saying they should openly acknowledge the present problems honestly and not not explicitly lie or try to obfuscate information. The very same people refusing right now are the ones who have likely taken the time to look into things a bit more. When they do search out information, instead of finding honest answers, scientists giving them answers and working towards solutions, debates helping to alleviate concerns, etc., they're finding the exact opposite; our institutions saying those things simply don't exist and a mountain of shit being censored.
If the actual goal is to try and get people who are undecided to participate in the vaccination program, then they're doing a terrible job by essentially lying straight to them. Even your example they could take time to publicly confront and explain; however, they don't. In most cases, they simply say, "Consensus is that it's safe." Which really seems to be a theme, doesn't it? Even out of the nearly one hundred or more medical studies I've read over this last 9 months or so, no matter the information contained inside and how it presents the potential for some serious issues, for some reason, they all include that within their study: "The vaccine is currently considered safe and people should be encouraged to take it, now let us tell you how it's harming hundreds of thousands."
But I don't believe the goal isn't getting hesitant people vaccinated; it's to form a narrative. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that the vast majority of what's been taking place isn't based around science but instead based around politics. They're trying to create another situation similar to Trump vs. the left, where everyone associated with a specific group is dehumanized, villainized, denigrated, smeared, lied about, and made to look stupid. They're probably doing this because in the future they have plans to enforce more severe measures and need a scapegoat that's been firmly implanted in people's minds to use. They're gaslighting to get people to accept authoritarianism because they'll be made to believe it's the "moral" thing to do.
Currently, we still don't know what the long-term effects of the vaccines will be. One thing is for certain, if Israel — or hell, even Mongolia — are any indication, it's not going to be pretty. The most concerning part is that as they build towards this narrative, should the worst outcome come to pass and everyone becomes terribly ill because of the vaccine program, they'll very likely use the unvaxxed as the reason for that. At that point, it's entirely possible that we can expect some seriously dark shit to happen. Presently, I'm hoping that won't be the case.
The very same people refusing right now are the ones who have likely taken the time to look into things a bit more. When they do search out information, instead of finding honest answers, scientists giving them answers and working towards solutions, debates helping to alleviate concerns, etc., they're finding the exact opposite; our institutions saying those things simply don't exist and a mountain of shit being censored.
I think, in their minds, it's the only way to get people to comply.
Allowing people to ask hard questions and allowing scientists and medical professional to give any sort of honest answer would turn off any common-minded individual who actually cares about their health. Plus those same people could then use health professional statements as citations about the harms of the vaccines, which, as you mentioned, couldn't be allowed as it would break the narrative.
Getting all the scientists to lie about it makes it really hard, almost nigh impossible, to quote a legitimate institution about the dangers of mRNA technology or the SAEs associated with the vax. So, I'm guessing that's why they were just going to lie all along and keep repeating the "safe and effective" routine, even if it meant people cracking away at the narrative at various opporutnities... such as a twerking rap star known for her large posterior.
The most concerning part is that as they build towards this narrative, should the worst outcome come to pass and everyone becomes terribly ill because of the vaccine program, they'll very likely use the unvaxxed as the reason for that.
Right, they're already using the unvaxxed narrative now to pin all the variant strains on them, even though we already know the variants are replicating from the vaccinated.
I imagine they'll blame many of the upcoming sicknesses and deaths during the fall/winter on the unvaccinated to go full-blown authoritarian on mandates and boosters.
I can assure you that I've likely read much more than an overwhelming majority have on the topic. I'm well aware of mRNA's history, as well as the history of failures in attempting to make vaccines for coronoavirus's to begin with. My post history should make that clear. I'm even more aware of the adverse reactions being reported (or lack thereof), the potential risks of ADE, the toxic pathogenic spike protein, myocarditis, Bell's Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, the terrifying prospect of Marek's Disease, other protein related inflammation, reproductive issues, and so much more. You seem to be the one lacking understanding of what I'm saying. I'm not saying they should put forth these ideas and spam headlines with them. Nuance does exist, you know? I'm speaking solely on the best way for them to gain compliance. I'm saying they should openly acknowledge the present problems honestly and not not explicitly lie or try to obfuscate information. The very same people refusing right now are the ones who have likely taken the time to look into things a bit more. When they do search out information, instead of finding honest answers, scientists giving them answers and working towards solutions, debates helping to alleviate concerns, etc., they're finding the exact opposite; our institutions saying those things simply don't exist and a mountain of shit being censored.
If the actual goal is to try and get people who are undecided to participate in the vaccination program, then they're doing a terrible job by essentially lying straight to them. Even your example they could take time to publicly confront and explain; however, they don't. In most cases, they simply say, "Consensus is that it's safe." Which really seems to be a theme, doesn't it? Even out of the nearly one hundred or more medical studies I've read over this last 9 months or so, no matter the information contained inside and how it presents the potential for some serious issues, for some reason, they all include that within their study: "The vaccine is currently considered safe and people should be encouraged to take it, now let us tell you how it's harming hundreds of thousands."
But I don't believe the goal isn't getting hesitant people vaccinated; it's to form a narrative. Anyone who has been paying attention knows that the vast majority of what's been taking place isn't based around science but instead based around politics. They're trying to create another situation similar to Trump vs. the left, where everyone associated with a specific group is dehumanized, villainized, denigrated, smeared, lied about, and made to look stupid. They're probably doing this because in the future they have plans to enforce more severe measures and need a scapegoat that's been firmly implanted in people's minds to use. They're gaslighting to get people to accept authoritarianism because they'll be made to believe it's the "moral" thing to do.
Currently, we still don't know what the long-term effects of the vaccines will be. One thing is for certain, if Israel — or hell, even Mongolia — are any indication, it's not going to be pretty. The most concerning part is that as they build towards this narrative, should the worst outcome come to pass and everyone becomes terribly ill because of the vaccine program, they'll very likely use the unvaxxed as the reason for that. At that point, it's entirely possible that we can expect some seriously dark shit to happen. Presently, I'm hoping that won't be the case.
I agree completely. I still wouldn't take the shot, but they're clearly losing some people due to the aggressive censorship.
I think, in their minds, it's the only way to get people to comply.
Allowing people to ask hard questions and allowing scientists and medical professional to give any sort of honest answer would turn off any common-minded individual who actually cares about their health. Plus those same people could then use health professional statements as citations about the harms of the vaccines, which, as you mentioned, couldn't be allowed as it would break the narrative.
Getting all the scientists to lie about it makes it really hard, almost nigh impossible, to quote a legitimate institution about the dangers of mRNA technology or the SAEs associated with the vax. So, I'm guessing that's why they were just going to lie all along and keep repeating the "safe and effective" routine, even if it meant people cracking away at the narrative at various opporutnities... such as a twerking rap star known for her large posterior.
Right, they're already using the unvaxxed narrative now to pin all the variant strains on them, even though we already know the variants are replicating from the vaccinated.
I imagine they'll blame many of the upcoming sicknesses and deaths during the fall/winter on the unvaccinated to go full-blown authoritarian on mandates and boosters.