So the president of ACLU is a black women that also directs the Center on Race, Inequality, and the Law and the Civil Rights Clinic at NYU School of Law.
The best take I have read is that in both cases they were promoting elimination of local decisionmaking and norms in favor of centralized control over "Civil Liberties" (which obviously would benefit organizations like the ACLU as they would become more powerful). When considered from that standpoint they were enormously successful at doing that in the 60s and 70s and continue to fight for that today.
A consequence of these court decisions is that we now have the Feds using Civil Rights law to prevent states from banning local governments from mandating masks in schools. Which could be seen as the Feds enforcing localism over a (slightly less) central State government's dictates, but given that we know how eagerly the Feds will trample over local governments to enforce their will we know that obviously isn't the case.
You can't be pro-mandate and "pro-choice" at the same time.
Yes you can, one affects their people, and one affects those vile conservative misogynist racist (insert buzzword)
And shit like this is why I stopped trusting the ACLU and no longer give them money. I think my last donation was nearly seven years ago.
So the president of ACLU is a black women that also directs the Center on Race, Inequality, and the Law and the Civil Rights Clinic at NYU School of Law.
Just needed to be related to the climate cult and she'd be involved in every feminist puppet movement.
She just needs an opportunity and she would join that as well.
No need, the sisterhood have it under control.
ACLU today is not the same org that defended the right of actual nazis to march in Illinois...
The best take I have read is that in both cases they were promoting elimination of local decisionmaking and norms in favor of centralized control over "Civil Liberties" (which obviously would benefit organizations like the ACLU as they would become more powerful). When considered from that standpoint they were enormously successful at doing that in the 60s and 70s and continue to fight for that today.
A consequence of these court decisions is that we now have the Feds using Civil Rights law to prevent states from banning local governments from mandating masks in schools. Which could be seen as the Feds enforcing localism over a (slightly less) central State government's dictates, but given that we know how eagerly the Feds will trample over local governments to enforce their will we know that obviously isn't the case.
https://archive.ph/Y6G88