From c/MGTOW, fresh OnlyFans girl tears for all the "misogynists" to enjoy.
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Here's the big problem for me.
On one hand, the reason why these thots got destroyed was because of their own short sightedness and stupidity. Nothing new - leftist feminists never think farther than 1 day into the future.
On the other hand, there's a bigger problem to be addressed.
Part of the reason why Alex Jones and a lot of so-called fringe conservatives got deplatformed was because of these very banks. If banks and payment processors are forcing OF to change their model then that pretty much is the Next Step in the ahem... BANKERS... overtaking us is it not?
I know a lot of people are celebrating this but it kinda proves the point that the ...bankers/payment processors... are becoming so much of a problem it's even starting to finally affect the left.
So what's next to do?
I'm putting ellipses to emphasize a common /pol/ narrative by the way lol.
Not really. OnlyFans was refusing to comply with basic rules around CP and the banks knew a lot of people would support their demise so they pulled the plug.
That's if this isn't just because they're chasing that sweet IPO cash, which is simply because adult organizations aren't accepted by mainstream investment banking.
Either way, I don't see any reason to worry. If anything, this is a sign that feminism doesn't have as tight of a grip on financial services as I thought.
It means Sex Negative Feminism has a bigger grip than THOT Feminism (they are not Sex Positive unless it is for themselves.)
Exactly. I don't know why it's so hard to understand that there are different sides of feminism on this. After all, sex is women's biggest tool in manipulating men. It should be obvious that there are different opinions among feminists on how to best use this - whether to work together to control the supply (and raise the price), or whether they should be allowed individually to simply exploit sex to the max.
its not feminist, its the woke venture capital faggoots
Sources? This is the type of justification often used by authoritarians because, obviously, almost nobody would support that content in the 1st place given how abhorrent it is, in addition to its illegality. However, they willfully make such claims knowing that they are complete fabrications.
I can envision there being CP on the platform at times given how it requires reporting and moderation; any such medium (file/image/video hosts, etc.) is subject to this type of attack vector. But I didn't find anything supporting your assertion of them refusing their moderation responsibilities at a cursory search.
No response, huh. I came across this just now on KiA - https://archive.fo/d8RC2
There's more listed than just minors, but it's a clear issue with the moderation system:
You're starting to see the light. The same (((people))) who run the banks also control the politicians (and it isn't the feminists).