One of the biggest pitfalls of common discourse is allowing people who want you dead to define the argument. Thomas Sowell became prominent because he did not let the trappings of political arguments be the only possible answers. Stop using the term white, I’m Slavic, Germanic, and Nordic. This means me and people from the Mediterranean have fuck all in common but we are still classified the same. As an American I have nothing in common with Germans, yet I am classified in the same group. Playing by these stupid identity games only gives these quibbling retards validation. Want to discriminate legitimately? Use their culture. We already know that ghetto black culture is shit, we already know that central and South American culture is shit, we already know that Northwestern American culture is shit. The practices a culture implements shows over generations, black American who eat vegetables and don’t down hundreds of grams of sugar a day magically live past 65. Asian families have been growing taller in America thanks to access to real food. A culture defines your genetics tomorrow.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (110)
sorted by:
Wrong, I clearly understand it, that's the problem: you're a revisionist.
Germany already collapsed during the interwar period. The Weimar government had turned the economy around from it's own mismanagement and began recovering the economy. The Weimar government had already negotiated down it's debt payments to the rest of the European powers because of their inflated currency, and the hyperinflation actually served to screw over the Great Powers by making the German debt worthless until it could be renegotiated.
The German State needed fewer Leftists. Lebensraum never served any point except as a pretext to a war that Hitler wanted to start anyways due to the last days of the Wiemar government re-instituting Socialist policies, and then his failed implementation of Socialist policies. He started extracting the asset wealth of other countries because he was quickly destroying Germany's economy by parasatizing it to death.
They never had to get oil in the Soviet Union. Had they stayed in their own borders they could have kept buying it from Romania, more importantly, they basically monopolized the Romanian oil fields anyway. The only reason they needed even more oil is because Hitler intended on conquering the rest of Europe to create an Autarkey (a Socialist economic concept) to avoid the disaster of Capitalism's "Shrinking Markets (another Socialist economic concept).
The National Socialists never had to do shit. Hitler was smashing his own economy to bits and needed to expand in order to preserve his attempt at Autarkey. The enslavement of Poland (and the Slavs) was an added bonus to keep Germany prosperous at the expense of Eastern Europe. Exterminating all of the Jews of Europe to "save" Europe from the Jews was another reason to invade Poland.
They never had to do shit. They insisted on being Leftist psychos who were economically illiterate.
Don't worry, I'm happy to condemn the National Socialists strongest ally: The Soviet Union. It's just too bad that Stalin was too stupid to realize that you shouldn't trust Leftists like Hitler. You'd think he'd know better.
It doesn't matter what you think because you'll do exactly the same. You don't want to be allies with anyone who looks like you, but isn't subservient to your cause. Your white identitarianism was never real, and is normally just an advocation for some other group to conquer the whole.
It's clear I won't convince people like you of anything, so there's no point in debating you. I only want to debate people who have potential of understanding the reality. You are very far from having an accurate understanding, and likely won't concede anything. You are either a race traitor or a joo.
Which leaves me with only one question for you: How is the weather in Tel Aviv?
I'd concede on anything if you were right about anything. But you're not. Your entire weltanschauung is completely wrong and ahistorical. As with any leftist, you're starting so far on the wrong foot that anyone with knowledge of history must reject you, repeatedly, with every assertion you make. You don't make correct assertions.
As I said, you are the only race traitor here. You lie and pretend you care about blood relationships, and the reality is that you only care about creed. Whites either submit to your demands, or you put a bullet in them. If you gave a shit about whites, you'd have to admit that you would try and help every single white communist, white Antifa, white muslim, and even white jew. You wouldn't even make the attempt, and you're far more likely to purge white christians, white conservatives, white liberals, and apolitical whites right along with them.
As with Black Lives Matter: it has nothing to do with the race you claim to protect.
It's true we'd like to purge all communists, but I don't see how that makes me a race traitor. They (and you) are the race traitors. Just because I want my people to succeed and be free doesn't mean I have to accept all whites. That's like saying "If you love animals you must allow mice to live in your house".
If you want me to believe you're willing to concede something, tell me something from the official narrative of WW2 you don't believe, and answer this: Why do you think National Socialists believe what we believe? Is it because we're jealous of jews? We like making people angry? We're brainwashed? Brainwashed as adults after being taught a very accurate version of history in school? To believe in something that will make most people hate us? If you believe that you're very naive, have a low IQ, or you're a shill.
Yes it does. Booker T Washington and W.E.B. DuBouis had this issue with blacks and even they had to accept that no matter the political orientation, the uplifting of black people, individually and as a whole, was an imperative. They argued against each other for being polar opposites, but they also were prepared to credit each other, and help one another to uplift blacks regardless of political divide.
You will never do that.
You are a Socialist first, and a white person second. Socialism, forever and always, takes priority above all things. You would kill 100 million whites before taking a single loss to your Socialist pride.
Because you are Socialists who are hungry to use race as a means to power. You will kill all the whites you want so long as you get power for yourself. Just as the the German National Socialists killed as many Germans as they could imagine to seize and maintain their power above all other things.
Partly, yes. You aren't mad at anything the jews have ever done. You think you are in an eternal race war for dominance. You're not mad about jews. You're mad because you think you are loosing.
Absolutely. Anger is an effective means to power. Manipulating people's emotions to get you to do what you say is a tactical objective, as with all Leftists.
It depends on whether or not you're one of the Useful Idiots of your own faction.
On the contrary stupid, you're not low IQ. Fascism and National Socialism were always the realm of the Intellectual class. It was the use of the IQ measurement as a political device that lead the Intellectual Elite into adopting Racialism as a Progressive concept. Mixed with Social Darwinism, their Racialist ideology reinforced their understanding of themselves as the pinnacle of human evolution at that time. Ivy League Intellectuals saw themselves as the next evolutionary step, and they felt that they were being threatened by the dangerous mass of low IQ jews that would cause the Malthusian population bomb to go off! Well, by racial necessity, mass depopulation of undesirable races was very Progressive. Whether it was through population control in eugenics, forced relocation programs, or just open extermination.
They were clearly high IQ, but were still fucking retarded. This partly demonstrated by Malthusian Theories being completely wrong, and for thinking that Jews were inherently low IQ. But, Leftist Ideology normally works that way.
But these progressive intellectual attitudes are why Richard Spencer is doing the right thing from your ideological perspective. He thinks the political wind is shifting such that Racialism, particularly White Identitarianism, is going to orbit around Leftism... because he's right and it always has. That's where all the fertile recruiting ground is going to be: among authoritarian, politically racialized, and emotionally resentful whites. The Right is becoming more anti-government (which is a promotion of Liberalism which you have to destroy), and is promoting religious values (which explicitly reject racialism as divisive to the religion).
There is a reason why so many Communists joined the Fascist and National Socialist movements. You'll have a lot more luck with Bernie Bros than Libertarians. This is because you are Leftists, and the Bernie Brows are an easy sell.
Try this: Go to a Bernie Bro, Yang Gang, or Tulsi fan, and ask them if they'd support a National Labor
FrontUnion.Now you got me wondering if there is some grand plan to do the same sort of thing with the US debt as it currently exist.
Or they could just be a bunch of retards who dont know know how to economy because they are Leftist.
Who knows.
Typically, at the higher levels, they know what they are doing and are just lying.
Like, the Federal Reserve knows that printing money causes inflation. Biden is delusional. The Biden administration is just re-defining inflation as "rising prices" and then lying. The Federal Reserve thinks they can control inflation because they are manipulating a bunch of financial vehicles and instruments to basically remove liquidity from the market. There is a long, convoluted, explanation and it has something to do with Repo agreements.
The Wiemar government knew, but it also wanted to exploit the benefits of hyperinflation anyway (mass asset wealth seizure and the ease at paying off debt). They probably thought they could manage the economy better if they just controlled the economy through printing, but the damage was too severe to keep it going.
For example: Hitler was a Socialist, and so he made all sorts of terrible economic policies. But this was also a man, and indeed a whole fucking party, that opposed the inflationary practice of printing money via a central bank. Well. When Hitler got into power that's one of the things he did with the Reichsmark. He debased his own currency to pay for massive social programs in Germany. But then he did something even worse monetarily. In regions he conquered, the German army stole absolutely fucking everything that wasn't nailed down. He stole the East's asset wealth to combat inflation. No one in Germany seemed to realize how much trouble they were in (besides the food shortage), because the conquered territories were the ones who were actually facing the consequences. The rising costs of door knobs due to inflation could be reduced by stealing door knobs from Poland and adding them to your supply.
But then and his bankers did something truly evil: he invented a fiat currency just for occupied territories to steal assets to Germany. Think about this:
He used a fiat currency to remove the asset wealth of Eastern Europe.
When the Fabians say, "You will own nothing and you will be happy", they are looking to the German plan of extracting all asset wealth from you, combined with permanent debt, and perpetual inflation.
So, for the Socialists, are they totally economically illiterate? No, not entirely. They have a lot of bad assumptions... but they know what happens when you start printing money. Do they know?...
In the words of liberated Jewish prisoners at Bergen-Belsen to the nearby German townsfolk:
"YOU KNEW!"
Because of course they did. How could they not?