It noted that the Supreme Court ruled in 1905 that a state can require all members of the public to be vaccinated against smallpox.
Because it was a highly contagious, deadly disease with no real treatment at the time and the vaccine was proven to WORK!!! Covid is weak sauce and there are several effective treatments. This is not a vaccine, it is an experiment to test to see if they can create vaccines from MRNA shots without having to pay for decades of human trials and seeing what long-term reactions are without consequences (Surprise, bitch, they can't yet!). This is clearly not the fucking same.
Yes, which is why we need a new supreme court to overturn or narrow the scope of that ruling since the current makeup won't settle a god damn thing. There is no disease that spreads like small pox and this ruling it out of date. We are also no longer in a time where we have no medicines and people don't have access to treatments. I'd say there's nobody denying vaccines on a religious ground that science is a lie perpetrated by the devil, but we have 47% of the country praying to Fauci.
An Aside: Ethical and individual liberty reasons, I'd like to debate about, but not a single fucking person who has responded to my comment has brought those up. Just making stupid and vague comments that seem like they might be insults or support for the ruling.
Because it was a highly contagious, deadly disease with no real treatment at the time and the vaccine was proven to WORK!!! Covid is weak sauce and there are several effective treatments. This is not a vaccine, it is an experiment to test to see if they can create vaccines from MRNA shots without having to pay for decades of human trials and seeing what long-term reactions are without consequences (Surprise, bitch, they can't yet!). This is clearly not the fucking same.
But all those hundred-year-old laws banning sodomy and miscegenation are wrong, because emanations and penumbras.
Yeah, but they can find a media narrative to back up exactly the point you just made, and it's far easier to fabricate one of those than actual facts.
Yes, which is why we need a new supreme court to overturn or narrow the scope of that ruling since the current makeup won't settle a god damn thing. There is no disease that spreads like small pox and this ruling it out of date. We are also no longer in a time where we have no medicines and people don't have access to treatments. I'd say there's nobody denying vaccines on a religious ground that science is a lie perpetrated by the devil, but we have 47% of the country praying to Fauci.
An Aside: Ethical and individual liberty reasons, I'd like to debate about, but not a single fucking person who has responded to my comment has brought those up. Just making stupid and vague comments that seem like they might be insults or support for the ruling.