I remember in ages past it was fairly easy to inject new content or edit pages, but over time "controversial" subjects became increasingly protected by cliques of commie editors abusing their 3 edit rule, and it because impossible to do anything but cleverly troll. The last straw for me was their insistence on a curated list of "reliable sources", which is the same model that big tech have adopted in general.
The downside of a wiki anyone can edit is the people that would actually make good edits have shit to do.
And that's not even getting into the byzantine rule scheme and the turf wars the editors get into when anyone infringes on their pages.
What an awful site.
It's literally a cesspool and normies look at it like some kind of infallible holy source of information.
The best thing that they actually taught us in public school was that Wikipedia wasnt a viable source.
Not everyone can edit wikipedia, the blessing of our tranny overlords is required first.
I remember in ages past it was fairly easy to inject new content or edit pages, but over time "controversial" subjects became increasingly protected by cliques of commie editors abusing their 3 edit rule, and it because impossible to do anything but cleverly troll. The last straw for me was their insistence on a curated list of "reliable sources", which is the same model that big tech have adopted in general.