After the newest iteration of sexual kink story hour I was thinking about the gay rights movement and once again can only come to one conclusion, the gay rights movement was a contrived milestone, not the goal. The harshest reality we, as a society, are not willing to come to terms with is how reproachable humanity can be. We have, from the own writings of the modern social architects (Foucault, Young, Butler, et al) that in their own words believe pedophilia is natural and should be accepted into society. The Overton window was slid to the most agreeable milestone, gays who just want to be like everyone else and keep what happens in the bedroom in the bedroom. This of course was a lie from conception, but it gave room for the fingerholds of these social architects.
This methodology is a common business and government practice of what is called freezing and unfreezing(Kotters 8 step method is a similar methodology). When looking to implement change you need to first make a rationale for you change. “Government shouldn’t dictate what happens in a private bedroom”. Remember that line? So with these rationalizations they unfroze the social structure and inserted their addition. This however brings us to the most crucial step, freezing the new idea into our society. This was done, rather ingeniously on two fronts, first was the humanization approach. They took the “victims” and made them relatable. Media and culture became flooded with “Gayness”. These were your sassy fairies with charming quips and non threatening presence. Meanwhile, the second part, and frankly, the most ingenious part, was to unfreeze the next bastion as the other was freezing and make it present in the public discourse. Remember when the first CSI did an episode entirely on furries? This process made the former leap look American as apple pie. Yes, the gay quippy person with a lisp can stay, just keep the weird animal larpers in their hole. Once the refreezing was completed, the gays (Let’s keep the government out of the bedroom) gained license to expand like Oprah at a buffet. Gay rights became lgbt, then lgbtq, the lgbtqia, and on and on. We still to this day have zero proof that gayness is hereditary, or in fact is even innately biological, but even hardcore conservatives wouldn’t be openly willing to take sexual identity out off protected classes. In fact our “conservative” Supreme Court has ruled gender identity as innate and immutable. These constant changes are not from some imaginary chance of human discovery like we have been sold, the end goal is the same today as it was in conception.
The bigger red pill: it was never about "civil rights".
Definitely no civil rights involved. I've said this before and gotten lambasted, but gays never had any less rights than the rest of us. No one could marry someone of the same sex, and everyone could marry someone of the opposite sex. Equal rights already existed. They sneakily used the cover of "equal rights" when they really meant right to legalize degeneracy.
Trans also never had any less rights than the rest of us, no one can change sex, not just the crazy people who want to think they can.
Edit: Whoever's downvoting this, why not show yourself and have a discussion? Unlike leftist mafia we will actually discuss here not block and ban.
Not talking about homos. I'm talking about the black "civil rights" subversion from the 60s that is currently mythologized and elevated in public education over any other happening in american history.
The red pill that is that those events were a terrible thing for the country. The federal laws that were passed destroyed freedom of association and pulled the idea of federalism itself off of the life support it had been gasping on since the reconstruction amendments were passed.
Yep. MLK was a Marxist. The Civil Rights Acts are unconstitutional.
Yes, black people weren't being treated fairly. But the fact of the matter is that was changing rather rapidly organically. We didn't just suddenly become significantly less racist because congress passed some legislation saying you can't kick blacks out of your restaurants anymore.. that very prospect is laughable, if anything they'd be more pissed. We were already learning to see past race. If the civil rights act was removed in entirety, virtually nothing would change except a restoration of the freedom of association (which if anyone used in a racist way, their business would be mobbed away).
It reminds me of the assaults weapon ban in the 90s. Proponents of another AWB will claim the original reduced gun violence significantly, but in truth it was already on the downturn and continued to reduce after the AWB lifted in the early 2000's.
In short, the only thing the government is good at is taking credit for shit they didn't do.
Yes, and Rosa Parks was a trained communist instigator. They basically cast her into a role.