And they say the slippery slope is a fallacy
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Slippery slope isn't real, because it presumes that the escalation is a consequence of the initial concession and not just the true end goal.
To put this into an example that I know very well - women's vote didn't lead to what we have now because of the slippery slope - it was because their true intentions were hidden to get their initial successes. Now that they are firmly entrenched and hold a large amount of power, they can be more open about their end game.
It was always communism, from the very beginning.
The problem with your definition is it requires the idea of both long term planning and the same people behind each step.
Women lack the foresight and brain power to have planned all of this from the start. Each generation just took what was already there, assumed it was the baseline, and then took more. A tumblr hair feminist from 10 years ago had no idea about the Tranny movement supplanting them and how powerful it would be in doing so.
They were already openly talking about their desire for male genocide in 1893. There's a book, r/MensRights found it. I've never been able to acquire a copy, I forgot the title after a while and gave up, but it does prove that there definitely was long term planning.
One day I'll acquire all the feminist texts I refer to and be able to quote them perfectly.
That's not the point I'm making. You are trying to imply there is a single thread with each of them pulling it along over time.
When its a massive force of chaos being all drawn in a direction through raw hedonism and narcissism (and probably a handful of elite at the top with certain pushes). 99% of the current crop of feminists know next to nothing about their own history, nor do they care about finishing their work.
They simply all desire power and freedom from consequence, which manifests the same paths. A convergent evolution.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. The way their movement has been successful is too complicated to be mere happenstance. The only misstep they've made is with the tranny cult and I still think they'll manage to turn that into a win.
I still wonder where the idea that feminists are fat, ugly and a target of mockery came from. It weakened us to their game more than anything else.
Most real-world instances of the "slippery slope" are simply instances of this phenomenon:
You can have both a slope and somebody pushing the sled from behind.
that is exactly what slippery slope refers to; give devil a finger and it takes whole hand; give in even a little, and you will loose it all
That's not what it refers to, they always theme it around a continuing decline in values.
In reality, if we didn't have feminist sympathizers agitating on behalf of every group known to man, the slippery slope wouldn't be true at all.
Gays wanted to marry, they didn't want the whole alphabet mafia. Women wanted this, because it helped dehumanize men.
Race relations were fine before women's groups poisoned the well with White Privilege and BLM.
Every single group that's cited as a proof of the slippery slope is just a group that walked away from their own fight because it was won and let feminists take over.
and that is because feminists had first success, so they went for next success, and then next ,and then taking next successes on behalf of others because there werent any other successes for them to claim; all on marxist movement; and as slippery slope, slope to continue falling on, it wont stop until full marxist utopia is set in (theme of movement since start never was equality, it was always crush the current norms)