COVID is not a cold. COVID is not the flu. It does not kill people like the flu. It is a disease which operates in a completely different manner.
He used hyperbole to point out the fact that COVID is overblown. On its own, in healthy individuals, you CAN beat it just like the flu or a common cold. Some people had it and didn't even know they had it, but because they were healthy it didn't matter, their system fought it off.
I didn't say anything about the vaccines, or even about zinc.
You did. In a previous comment you mentioned some of them "may have" needed the death jab, as opposed to the more common sense approach of changing to healthier eating habits, vitamins, or natural methods that are proven NOT to have morbid side-effects worse than what you're actually treating.
Even more than that, the death jabs don't even prevent you from catching COVID, nor does it prevent you from dying from it. So why even suggest it in the first place?
That's why I said he was right and you were wrong, because at least the end-game of his summation is that you can fight off COVID without the death jab (he's right). Your end summation was that SOME people should still get the death jab even when it provides ZERO short term benefits, and we won't even know what the long-term side effects are for the Pfizer jabs until the study completes in May of 2023.
Anyone even remotely suggesting to take the death jab instead of following proper medical protocol, waiting for longitudinal peer reviewed studies and control test results isn't just being an idiot, they're being a braindead, jogger-tier idiot who is suggesting someone play Russian roulette with their life.
Typically drugs are supposed to go through proper trial testing before being administered. Most drugs are supposed to be approved for use as well. "Authorizing" a death jab that has worse side-effects than the thing it doesn't even treat is just beyond the pale.
No matter what you do, you are playing Russian roulette.
When it comes to a lot of medicine, you're actually right about this.
That's not a protocol for someone seeking to lower own's chance of dying from covid-related bullshit, that's exactly my point, there isn't one.
Needless to say, i approve that taking drugs that nobody has any liability for on top of physically absent long-term impact research is plain bad idea, sometimes it's still the best of the 2 shitty choices.
He used hyperbole to point out the fact that COVID is overblown.
No he didn't, he made a stupid comment that was patently absurd and deleted it because it was obviously wrong.
In a previous comment you mentioned some of them "may have" needed
Because that was my general opinion, and his response was to deny that COVID was even real.
the death jab,
Now your being hyperbolic. If the vaccines were as dangerous as you were trying to pretend it is, there'd be over a million dead in the UK.
That's why I said he was right and you were wrong, because at least the end-game of his summation is that you can fight off COVID without the death jab (he's right).
That wasn't his argument. I don't care about your rants about the vaccine. You're changing his goalposts.
Russian roulette with their life.
Idiocy. Again: the death rate is not 1/6 , 1/5 , 1/8. Stop being ridiculous.
No, he's not right, he's idiot, and you're making a non-sequitr.
COVID is not a cold. COVID is not the flu. It does not kill people like the flu. It is a disease which operates in a completely different manner.
I didn't say anything about the vaccines, or even about zinc.
He used hyperbole to point out the fact that COVID is overblown. On its own, in healthy individuals, you CAN beat it just like the flu or a common cold. Some people had it and didn't even know they had it, but because they were healthy it didn't matter, their system fought it off.
You did. In a previous comment you mentioned some of them "may have" needed the death jab, as opposed to the more common sense approach of changing to healthier eating habits, vitamins, or natural methods that are proven NOT to have morbid side-effects worse than what you're actually treating.
Even more than that, the death jabs don't even prevent you from catching COVID, nor does it prevent you from dying from it. So why even suggest it in the first place?
That's why I said he was right and you were wrong, because at least the end-game of his summation is that you can fight off COVID without the death jab (he's right). Your end summation was that SOME people should still get the death jab even when it provides ZERO short term benefits, and we won't even know what the long-term side effects are for the Pfizer jabs until the study completes in May of 2023.
Anyone even remotely suggesting to take the death jab instead of following proper medical protocol, waiting for longitudinal peer reviewed studies and control test results isn't just being an idiot, they're being a braindead, jogger-tier idiot who is suggesting someone play Russian roulette with their life.
There's no proper medical protocol. No matter what you do, you are playing Russian roulette.
Yes, there is: https://www.medtran.ru/eng/trials/protomechanics/ch5.htm
Added info about proper protocols for approving new drugs: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/investigational-new-drug-ind-application/ind-application-reporting-protocol-amendments
Typically drugs are supposed to go through proper trial testing before being administered. Most drugs are supposed to be approved for use as well. "Authorizing" a death jab that has worse side-effects than the thing it doesn't even treat is just beyond the pale.
When it comes to a lot of medicine, you're actually right about this.
That's not a protocol for someone seeking to lower own's chance of dying from covid-related bullshit, that's exactly my point, there isn't one.
Needless to say, i approve that taking drugs that nobody has any liability for on top of physically absent long-term impact research is plain bad idea, sometimes it's still the best of the 2 shitty choices.
No he didn't, he made a stupid comment that was patently absurd and deleted it because it was obviously wrong.
Because that was my general opinion, and his response was to deny that COVID was even real.
Now your being hyperbolic. If the vaccines were as dangerous as you were trying to pretend it is, there'd be over a million dead in the UK.
That wasn't his argument. I don't care about your rants about the vaccine. You're changing his goalposts.
Idiocy. Again: the death rate is not 1/6 , 1/5 , 1/8. Stop being ridiculous.
Because your opinion was wrong, dangerous, and based on misinformation you picked up from Left-wing sources.
We don't have actual death tolls, only known side-effects, 100% of which are worse than any of COVIDs side-effects.
Show me a study where COVID alone caused stillbirths. You can't.
Show me a study where COVID alone has caused heart inflammation. You can't.
Show me a study where COVID alone has caused infertility. You can't.
Case closed.
You should if you actually cared about efficacy instead of pushing misinformation spouted from Left-wing Communists.
Cite the actual death rates of all the COVID vaccines from a non-Left wing source.
No, he's just an idiot.
Uroku_Saki?
??? Nice.
Seriously, though. Go home faggot.