Typically drugs are supposed to go through proper trial testing before being administered. Most drugs are supposed to be approved for use as well. "Authorizing" a death jab that has worse side-effects than the thing it doesn't even treat is just beyond the pale.
No matter what you do, you are playing Russian roulette.
When it comes to a lot of medicine, you're actually right about this.
That's not a protocol for someone seeking to lower own's chance of dying from covid-related bullshit, that's exactly my point, there isn't one.
Needless to say, i approve that taking drugs that nobody has any liability for on top of physically absent long-term impact research is plain bad idea, sometimes it's still the best of the 2 shitty choices.
That's not a protocol for someone seeking to lower own's chance of dying from covid-related bullshit, that's exactly my point, there isn't one.
In that regard, no. But newly developed treatments for COVID still falls within the general medical protocols outlined for all new drugs (or at least, they're supposed to).
But that's because most of the remedies for COVID are pretty simple to obtain, and a lot of it just boils down to common sense healthy eating habits, rest, and upkeep of one's nutritional intake.
But it speaks volumes to how insidious this whole thing is when medical professionals recommending anything that isn't the vaccines are being out-right banned from social media for "spreading misinformation".
My biggest issue with some of the people here is how instead of questioning WHY Big Tech are censoring medical professionals from recommending homeopathic treatments and natural remedies, they're defending WHY people should be taking the death jab when ZERO longitudinal studies are available, none of the Phase III or Phase IV trials will be complete until May, 2023 at the earliest, and the media is purposely hiding the death rates, side-effects, and potential mortality factors associated with these experimental drugs.
The whole thing is sick and twisted, and so you'll have to pardon me if I get quite incensed with people here parroting mainstream media lies or recommending the death jab to relatives when no one has a darn clue what the short or long-term side effects are going to be for people of varying physiological dispositions.
It's just so disheartening seeing basic safety and procedural protocols thrown clear out the window for this man-made virus which could have come and gone had the medical community not be hog-tied into parroting a lot of misinformation and disinformation related to COVID (especially the death rates, where they counted people who died WITH COVID rather than only counting people who died FROM COVID).
are censoring medical professionals from recommending homeopathic treatments
I stop treating anyone recommending homeopathic (in the actual sense of the word) treatment as medical professional, so yeah, censoring them is counter-productive.
There's no proper medical protocol. No matter what you do, you are playing Russian roulette.
Yes, there is: https://www.medtran.ru/eng/trials/protomechanics/ch5.htm
Added info about proper protocols for approving new drugs: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/investigational-new-drug-ind-application/ind-application-reporting-protocol-amendments
Typically drugs are supposed to go through proper trial testing before being administered. Most drugs are supposed to be approved for use as well. "Authorizing" a death jab that has worse side-effects than the thing it doesn't even treat is just beyond the pale.
When it comes to a lot of medicine, you're actually right about this.
That's not a protocol for someone seeking to lower own's chance of dying from covid-related bullshit, that's exactly my point, there isn't one.
Needless to say, i approve that taking drugs that nobody has any liability for on top of physically absent long-term impact research is plain bad idea, sometimes it's still the best of the 2 shitty choices.
In that regard, no. But newly developed treatments for COVID still falls within the general medical protocols outlined for all new drugs (or at least, they're supposed to).
But that's because most of the remedies for COVID are pretty simple to obtain, and a lot of it just boils down to common sense healthy eating habits, rest, and upkeep of one's nutritional intake.
But it speaks volumes to how insidious this whole thing is when medical professionals recommending anything that isn't the vaccines are being out-right banned from social media for "spreading misinformation".
My biggest issue with some of the people here is how instead of questioning WHY Big Tech are censoring medical professionals from recommending homeopathic treatments and natural remedies, they're defending WHY people should be taking the death jab when ZERO longitudinal studies are available, none of the Phase III or Phase IV trials will be complete until May, 2023 at the earliest, and the media is purposely hiding the death rates, side-effects, and potential mortality factors associated with these experimental drugs.
The whole thing is sick and twisted, and so you'll have to pardon me if I get quite incensed with people here parroting mainstream media lies or recommending the death jab to relatives when no one has a darn clue what the short or long-term side effects are going to be for people of varying physiological dispositions.
It's just so disheartening seeing basic safety and procedural protocols thrown clear out the window for this man-made virus which could have come and gone had the medical community not be hog-tied into parroting a lot of misinformation and disinformation related to COVID (especially the death rates, where they counted people who died WITH COVID rather than only counting people who died FROM COVID).
I stop treating anyone recommending homeopathic (in the actual sense of the word) treatment as medical professional, so yeah, censoring them is counter-productive.