Diversity is so wonderful.
I like how employers celebrate diversity while also having policies to increase diversity. They require you to celebrate that they can get away with discriminating against whites.
Every time I see that in the company news letters I hate the company a little bit more.
It's corporate America that's doing some of the heaviest and most effective labor of radicalizing American society along woke lines
No shit.
Corporatists are using Socialist rhetoric to balkanize society and maintain their corporate control.
The funniest part is that that cartoon is literally telling you what the corporations are doing. They are talking about how Christianity is dividing society which causes elites in power to stay in power by dividing up the general population, while the same corporation is encouraging you to divide yourselves up into "Liberation Groups".
What's the solution? Would removing all government subsidies and anticompetetive regulations on companies reduce the perverse incentive enough for them to stop their destructive behavior, or is something else necessary?
Have to start holding the individuals in charge of the companies personally accountable.
Kind of an example: here in Missouri we passed the protect the 2A law where any law enforcement in Missouri assisting the federal government in enforcement of gun laws can be personally charged with a crime for doing so and also opens them personally up to civil litigation as well. One police chief already resigned because of it. And his excuse was “if Biden says this is banned help us the law wouldn’t hold the department responsible it would hold me responsible”. Funny what happens when you remove immunity.
Start throwing corporate executives in jail for the shit they do and the board that allowed it as well and things change quickly. But that isn’t going to happen without some kind of revolution and it’s going to be a bloody one.
I agree with this, but the problem is that the corporation exists purely to prevent that from happening. This is the essence of "limited liability". These corporations are legal structures that prevent legal consequences to anyone involved. This is the reason why people tell you not to be a sole proprietorship: you can be held personally liable for things. Corporations exist so you can't be liable.
Then the government doubles down on that and increases the punishments and consequences for sole proprietorships and small businesses. Someone slipped and fell in your store? Pay $50,000 in civil suits to someone who either should have watched where they were going, or shouldn't be suing you for an accident.
I agree with everything you stated. I also think the crux of M1919A2's recourse to these matters, and the only solution to the problem you mentioned, is in his last sentence...
But that isn’t going to happen without some kind of revolution and it’s going to be a bloody one.
I disagree to a degree. I think that we'll see a slow liberalization of economics over the coming decades, along with the liberalization of most societies over the coming decades across the planet.
The question is: how violent is the establishment going to get to prevent that from happening.
In the grand scheme of things, I don't think it will be as peaceful as the liberalization of monarchies, but it's not going to be as unfathomably bloody. Remember that the collapse of international communism came about with hardly any bloodshed. I expect the collapse of Fabian Socialism to work in a similar way. Probably a relatively bloodless collapse. I don't think we're even going to see 6 digits.
IF the Fabians don't intentionally start a land war in Asia as a form of depopulation and deflation deflection.
Honestly, it would probably cause them to fucking implode. They would genuinely be so unable to respond to market forces that they would probably shatter into several smaller companies if you did just those things alone.
Most of these companies exist based on these perverse incentives. These preverse incentives are the fundamental point behind Keynsianism. The Cartel exists as an extention of government power to provide mandated economic outcomes that aren't covered by the welfare state which ensures dependency on both the corporation and the state.
The thing that's currently holding something like Twitter up is not only the American government directly, but a series of other cartels (also propped up by the government) in investment-banking, telecom, and advertising.
Stripping the protectionism would genuinely destroy the system we currently have to make it unrecognizable. If you attacked all the cartels and stripped them of all their government support, only one of two things would happen: a) they would collapse into total oblivion within months and we'd get entirely new platforms at every level; or b) foreign governments would dump billions into keeping them afloat for as long as humanely possible as a weapon to control the general populace of the rest of the planet.
This is the most shocking thing about all of this. These layers upon layers of protection are needed because the bigger these corporate structures are, the more fragile they become. They are not nearly as powerful as people think. They could not save themselves if the government wasn't stepping in at every turn to protect them.
Compare this to GameStonks. If the government hadn't stepped in, broken it's own laws, blackmailed Robinhood into having to over-fund it's positions to the point that it had to break it's own contracts with it's users; that capital firm would have collapses immediately. Instead, the collapse of that firm took several months.
These massive companies are malinvestment machines. That's why their shit is always garbage. They have no feedback to do the right or profitable thing because they are protected from market forces. The correction from those market forces destroys them. All you have to do is allow for consequences and the whole system dies. This is what depressions and recessions are: market corrections that absolutely gut swathes of the economy due to malinvestment.
Diversity is so wonderful. I like how employers celebrate diversity while also having policies to increase diversity. They require you to celebrate that they can get away with discriminating against whites.
Every time I see that in the company news letters I hate the company a little bit more.
No shit.
Corporatists are using Socialist rhetoric to balkanize society and maintain their corporate control.
The funniest part is that that cartoon is literally telling you what the corporations are doing. They are talking about how Christianity is dividing society which causes elites in power to stay in power by dividing up the general population, while the same corporation is encouraging you to divide yourselves up into "Liberation Groups".
THEY. ALWAYS. PROJECT.
What's the solution? Would removing all government subsidies and anticompetetive regulations on companies reduce the perverse incentive enough for them to stop their destructive behavior, or is something else necessary?
Have to start holding the individuals in charge of the companies personally accountable.
Kind of an example: here in Missouri we passed the protect the 2A law where any law enforcement in Missouri assisting the federal government in enforcement of gun laws can be personally charged with a crime for doing so and also opens them personally up to civil litigation as well. One police chief already resigned because of it. And his excuse was “if Biden says this is banned help us the law wouldn’t hold the department responsible it would hold me responsible”. Funny what happens when you remove immunity.
Start throwing corporate executives in jail for the shit they do and the board that allowed it as well and things change quickly. But that isn’t going to happen without some kind of revolution and it’s going to be a bloody one.
I agree with this, but the problem is that the corporation exists purely to prevent that from happening. This is the essence of "limited liability". These corporations are legal structures that prevent legal consequences to anyone involved. This is the reason why people tell you not to be a sole proprietorship: you can be held personally liable for things. Corporations exist so you can't be liable.
Then the government doubles down on that and increases the punishments and consequences for sole proprietorships and small businesses. Someone slipped and fell in your store? Pay $50,000 in civil suits to someone who either should have watched where they were going, or shouldn't be suing you for an accident.
I agree with everything you stated. I also think the crux of M1919A2's recourse to these matters, and the only solution to the problem you mentioned, is in his last sentence...
I disagree to a degree. I think that we'll see a slow liberalization of economics over the coming decades, along with the liberalization of most societies over the coming decades across the planet.
The question is: how violent is the establishment going to get to prevent that from happening.
In the grand scheme of things, I don't think it will be as peaceful as the liberalization of monarchies, but it's not going to be as unfathomably bloody. Remember that the collapse of international communism came about with hardly any bloodshed. I expect the collapse of Fabian Socialism to work in a similar way. Probably a relatively bloodless collapse. I don't think we're even going to see 6 digits.
IF the Fabians don't intentionally start a land war in Asia as a form of depopulation and deflation deflection.
Honestly, it would probably cause them to fucking implode. They would genuinely be so unable to respond to market forces that they would probably shatter into several smaller companies if you did just those things alone.
Most of these companies exist based on these perverse incentives. These preverse incentives are the fundamental point behind Keynsianism. The Cartel exists as an extention of government power to provide mandated economic outcomes that aren't covered by the welfare state which ensures dependency on both the corporation and the state.
The thing that's currently holding something like Twitter up is not only the American government directly, but a series of other cartels (also propped up by the government) in investment-banking, telecom, and advertising.
Stripping the protectionism would genuinely destroy the system we currently have to make it unrecognizable. If you attacked all the cartels and stripped them of all their government support, only one of two things would happen: a) they would collapse into total oblivion within months and we'd get entirely new platforms at every level; or b) foreign governments would dump billions into keeping them afloat for as long as humanely possible as a weapon to control the general populace of the rest of the planet.
This is the most shocking thing about all of this. These layers upon layers of protection are needed because the bigger these corporate structures are, the more fragile they become. They are not nearly as powerful as people think. They could not save themselves if the government wasn't stepping in at every turn to protect them.
Compare this to GameStonks. If the government hadn't stepped in, broken it's own laws, blackmailed Robinhood into having to over-fund it's positions to the point that it had to break it's own contracts with it's users; that capital firm would have collapses immediately. Instead, the collapse of that firm took several months.
These massive companies are malinvestment machines. That's why their shit is always garbage. They have no feedback to do the right or profitable thing because they are protected from market forces. The correction from those market forces destroys them. All you have to do is allow for consequences and the whole system dies. This is what depressions and recessions are: market corrections that absolutely gut swathes of the economy due to malinvestment.
bro all corporate America fund democrats. get a fucking grip.