They wont call it communism just like they don't now. They know the communism brand is tainted
They will call it "diversity", "inclusion", "feminism", "environmentalism", "civil rights", "reparations", "equity". They will "criticize" problems that are either real or made up and see who responds positively. Then demonize and cause harm by any means available to anyone who responds negatively. Every definition is a twisted motte and bailey where they willl retreat to the motte and use any disagreement with the premise as a pretext to attack.
But the results they want are the same as plain old communism. Erasure of the rights of property and association mostly by extremely selective enforcement of those rights by the central authority. Because they know that unless those rights are destroyed the "revolution" cant succeed as individuals can easily ignore and exclude the agitators and still live normal lives.
We don't need to ban communism, we need to make individuals AFRAID to publicly support communism. Just like the commies are doing now to any patriot who doesn't have fuck you money.
The model legislation IMO comes from Singapore, of all places.
(1) If an Act recites that action has been taken or threatened by any substantial body of persons, whether inside or outside Singapore —
(a) to cause, or to cause a substantial number of citizens to fear, organised violence against persons or property;
(b) to excite disaffection against the President or the Government;
(c) to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or other classes of the population likely to cause violence;
(d) to procure the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of anything by law established; or
(e) which is prejudicial to the security of Singapore,
They wont call it communism just like they don't now. They know the communism brand is tainted
They will call it "diversity", "inclusion", "feminism", "environmentalism", "civil rights", "reparations", "equity". They will "criticize" problems that are either real or made up and see who responds positively. Then demonize and cause harm by any means available to anyone who responds negatively. Every definition is a twisted motte and bailey where they willl retreat to the motte and use any disagreement with the premise as a pretext to attack.
But the results they want are the same as plain old communism. Erasure of the rights of property and association mostly by extremely selective enforcement of those rights by the central authority. Because they know that unless those rights are destroyed the "revolution" cant succeed as individuals can easily ignore and exclude the agitators and still live normal lives.
We don't need to ban communism, we need to make individuals AFRAID to publicly support communism. Just like the commies are doing now to any patriot who doesn't have fuck you money.
The model legislation IMO comes from Singapore, of all places.
So dictatorship.
This is probably the most ripe-for-exploitation thing I've seen. That's literally what these retards are going for when they post this: https://twitter.com/mrs_lerner/status/1409224273282150402
The trouble is you can't really legislate anything good because it's always a double edged sword