ProPublica is a non-credible left-wing source, with such exposes as "An algorithm to determine recidivism will correctly determine blacks more likely to re-offend than whites" and "Hey, did you know unrealized gains are untaxed" and "Peter Thiel knows how to use a Roth IRA".
As for Perdue, they made the drugs, they didn't make anyone take them.
A lot of noise there. Yes, they expected their drug to be successful. Yes, they promoted it. Yes, they paid salespeople bonuses. Just posting a wall of text and pretending it's somehow sinister is crap.
White as in white people on whom you're standing and pissing on, while defending their murderers.
Can't tell what he meant by "white"; the court filing ends with that word. Though I suspect he was simply continuing with the blizzard analogy. As for "murderers", don't give me that drug warrior nonsense. Whether you're white as snow or black as George Floyd, if you take the pill knowing what it is, you're responsible, not the manufacturer.
This is drug warrior propaganda again. It's true that a lot of addicts got their start with pills. But they generally weren't pills they (the addicts themselves) were prescribed.
Spoken like someone who's never lived in a hostile and/or foreign environment. Go move to China and see how well you can do on your own, with your values. Or dangerous parts of South Africa, though most of sub-saharan Africa would probably be good enough of a "foreign" environment to see how successful THAT kind of thinking would be.
ALL value is predefined; the ONEs within have the free will of choice to evaluate it temporarily. Evaluation represents the highest value in existence. To corrupt it; others suggest substitute values (money); which when consented to, ignores evaluation by free will of choice.
right or wrong
Aka reason...a conflict based on consenting to believe the suggestion of others. How about instead using implication (if/then)...no conflict; just adaptation.
ProPublica is a non-credible left-wing source, with such exposes as "An algorithm to determine recidivism will correctly determine blacks more likely to re-offend than whites" and "Hey, did you know unrealized gains are untaxed" and "Peter Thiel knows how to use a Roth IRA".
As for Perdue, they made the drugs, they didn't make anyone take them.
A lot of noise there. Yes, they expected their drug to be successful. Yes, they promoted it. Yes, they paid salespeople bonuses. Just posting a wall of text and pretending it's somehow sinister is crap.
Can't tell what he meant by "white"; the court filing ends with that word. Though I suspect he was simply continuing with the blizzard analogy. As for "murderers", don't give me that drug warrior nonsense. Whether you're white as snow or black as George Floyd, if you take the pill knowing what it is, you're responsible, not the manufacturer.
This is drug warrior propaganda again. It's true that a lot of addicts got their start with pills. But they generally weren't pills they (the addicts themselves) were prescribed.
Might have something to do with fentanyl. As your own source points out.
Fuck off, collectivist. How many you going to kill with your government?
Spoken like someone who's never lived in a hostile and/or foreign environment. Go move to China and see how well you can do on your own, with your values. Or dangerous parts of South Africa, though most of sub-saharan Africa would probably be good enough of a "foreign" environment to see how successful THAT kind of thinking would be.
ALL value is predefined; the ONEs within have the free will of choice to evaluate it temporarily. Evaluation represents the highest value in existence. To corrupt it; others suggest substitute values (money); which when consented to, ignores evaluation by free will of choice.
Aka reason...a conflict based on consenting to believe the suggestion of others. How about instead using implication (if/then)...no conflict; just adaptation.
Why cant I have a tribe that shares my values?