all concerns I've ever seen were always about infertility in women;
I can disprove this straight away, without any studies.
How the fuck would women keep their unearned gains if their "purpose" was completely negated? It would be a perfect gift to people like me to push towards replacing their purpose with technology.
That doesn't follow. They're still needed to have kids at that point.
The hypothetical situation where they are rendered literally useless would be the MGTOW dream of robotic partners that wholly replaced them in every way.
Biological women would end up being the bicycle that the fish never needed.
Imagine that. I still wouldn't want a robotic partner, but imagine women's downfall...
Here is the paper from the former head of R&D at Pfizer. The concern is that the vax prevents the formation of placentas. That leaves the eggs still in tact, which, if you finish reading Gearhart's paper, still allows for the artificial development of embryos from two ovum that she calls for.
That leaves the eggs still in tact, which, if you finish reading Gearhart's paper, still allows for the artificial development of embryos from two ovum that she calls for.
Suddenly the virus being a feminist plot moves back into likely territory.
If no one can have kids naturally, they can select by gender for implantation.
Did they win the war without firing a shot or us even noticing the plan?
Are you just refusing to watch the dark horse stuff? It seems like the long terms risks are with bone marrow and ovaries.
The idea that the vaccine must be X or Y because the opposite would be a gift to you and people like you has to be one of the most egotistical things I've read. The vaccine is the vaccine and it's going to do what it does regardless of any person's opinions.
It's like an anti-natalist saying "There's no way that Johnson and Johnson would put asbestos in baby powder, they make all their money from mother's and their kids!" Yet, they did just that.
Yeah, I don't trust that guy. He's a leftist, remember.
Not specifically because it's a gift to me personally, but because women's purpose being lost would be a massive MRA victory.
Still, we can't discount the possibility that the Fourth Reich will only allow implantation of female fetuses into the artificial wombs to retain their undeserved societal position.
I can disprove this straight away, without any studies.
How the fuck would women keep their unearned gains if their "purpose" was completely negated? It would be a perfect gift to people like me to push towards replacing their purpose with technology.
That doesn't follow. They're still needed to have kids at that point.
The hypothetical situation where they are rendered literally useless would be the MGTOW dream of robotic partners that wholly replaced them in every way.
Biological women would end up being the bicycle that the fish never needed.
Imagine that. I still wouldn't want a robotic partner, but imagine women's downfall...
Here is the paper from the former head of R&D at Pfizer. The concern is that the vax prevents the formation of placentas. That leaves the eggs still in tact, which, if you finish reading Gearhart's paper, still allows for the artificial development of embryos from two ovum that she calls for.
Suddenly the virus being a feminist plot moves back into likely territory.
If no one can have kids naturally, they can select by gender for implantation.
Did they win the war without firing a shot or us even noticing the plan?
Children are a burden remember? Freedom only lies in corporate office jobs
At least a job only lasts 9-5. Children are a chore that lasts 18 years and only extract capital from you.
Are you just refusing to watch the dark horse stuff? It seems like the long terms risks are with bone marrow and ovaries.
The idea that the vaccine must be X or Y because the opposite would be a gift to you and people like you has to be one of the most egotistical things I've read. The vaccine is the vaccine and it's going to do what it does regardless of any person's opinions.
It's like an anti-natalist saying "There's no way that Johnson and Johnson would put asbestos in baby powder, they make all their money from mother's and their kids!" Yet, they did just that.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=baby+powder+asbestos&t=brave&ia=web
Yeah, I don't trust that guy. He's a leftist, remember.
Not specifically because it's a gift to me personally, but because women's purpose being lost would be a massive MRA victory.
Still, we can't discount the possibility that the Fourth Reich will only allow implantation of female fetuses into the artificial wombs to retain their undeserved societal position.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12j0MYqz8K/x/c/4JAdbKTnZbg