When half our side is still scared about "well we don't want to have real white supremacists join us," we are a long ways from realistic options being considered.
Everyone is still stuck on that "only perfect utopian solutions that won't soil my morality" mode, which they will ride into hell.
Then I guess we are stuck never doing anything, because any tactic or rejection of the Woke, the SJWs, or the Left will gain you support from the White Supremacists because it advances them too in nearly every way you could take it.
Also, you talk like there are just tens of millions of these people. Here's a newsflash for you- they're barely a rounding error in the US population. They're literally nothing numbers-wise because people rightly think it's stupid
And yet just yesterday we had a guy terrified of white supremacists coming out and joining him in being anti-CRT. They don't need to exist, people will censor and gimp themselves in fear of the concept of them. People are worried that they might become associated with this boogeyman that barely exists, so much so that they hesitate to attack obvious horrible things.
That's the point you keep missing in your blind ranting against them, a group so minuscule they exist as a concept more than reality. People think they exist, and will make broad actions on that idea.
I said nothing about being a white supremacist, nor that they were right. That's a discussion bigger than either of us and will never settle in a manner that goes well.
My point is that being so deathly afraid of them that you gimp yourself is causing us to be in a constant state of loss, or more importantly stagnation. While we bicker amongst ourselves about how to not be a "bad white" the other races are happy to close ranks, go full tribalism, and get shit done. The followthrough on my point is maybe their tactics are effective, not morally or logically correct. Or at the very least they are at least getting somewhere, while we just keep ceding ground.
However, one thing stands out that needs to be addressed.
Candace Owens is going to have high quality children because Candace Owens is an extremely high quality individual who is herself descended from high quality individuals
Candace Owens was a Leftist who wanted to create a literal Social Credit system for America before all her fellow Leftists attacked her for it, during which time she magically reinvented herself as this staunch conservative anti-wokester who basically within months 180'd on her prior beliefs. But magically in doing so, she instantly was getting paid for talks and became super famous while before she was a literal nobody. KIA chronicled the entire thing back in the day because of how incredibly retarded she was, until months later she was some T_D darling.
Saying what other people want to hear, while getting promoted because you work as the "diversity shield" is not a "high quality" individual. There are infinite number of high quality black people who would make better examples than a meme person.
30 points average IQ isn't that much? 30 points is the difference between indoor plumbing and squalor. There's this neat little thing called an IQ threshold. See, the relationship between your ability to contribute to society and your IQ isn't linear. Whites, for instance, have lower average IQs than Jews or Asians. But look at white societies. Do they appear lacking? Blacks are only, what, one standard deviation below whites, but this differential is sufficient to generate an enormous cultural disparity - and that disparity is not equalled by the differences between white and Asian cultures.
Long story short: clearly none of this shit works the way you think it does.
IQ isn't really a single measurement. The high Jewish IQ is verbal. They're a bit above average at non-verbal, and below average with spatial reasoning. Good at talking in circles, but practical application of theory to the real world isn't a strong suit. On average.
OK, wait.. let me make these complex statisitical inferences about your character based on a diverse array of inputs and qualities I have determined are related to life outcomes which I feed into this algorithm I walk around with in my head and then I'll decide if you're a decent person or not....
More about having a stable, high trust society than any individual judgements.
If 1:1000 people in a population are shit, they can still build a great deal of social trust. If 1:100 (or 3:10 where you put it, though it's probably more like 1:5) are shit, trust is going to be much more difficult to build and maintain. Further, any non-homogeneous society experiences faction, though that can be compensated for if they're ethnically very similar and assimilate over time.
interracial
intraracial
For the second part, I'd say lets stay away from Jews for now, since those practices aren't technically criminal, there aren't good sources of statistical information, and all we can do is look at incomplete secondary information that just correlates to their occupation and compensation.
When half our side is still scared about "well we don't want to have real white supremacists join us," we are a long ways from realistic options being considered.
Everyone is still stuck on that "only perfect utopian solutions that won't soil my morality" mode, which they will ride into hell.
Then I guess we are stuck never doing anything, because any tactic or rejection of the Woke, the SJWs, or the Left will gain you support from the White Supremacists because it advances them too in nearly every way you could take it.
Glad we cleared that up with a perfect example.
Yeah, they don't get it. A soft grave is preferable to violating muh optics. We're fucked.
And yet just yesterday we had a guy terrified of white supremacists coming out and joining him in being anti-CRT. They don't need to exist, people will censor and gimp themselves in fear of the concept of them. People are worried that they might become associated with this boogeyman that barely exists, so much so that they hesitate to attack obvious horrible things.
That's the point you keep missing in your blind ranting against them, a group so minuscule they exist as a concept more than reality. People think they exist, and will make broad actions on that idea.
I said nothing about being a white supremacist, nor that they were right. That's a discussion bigger than either of us and will never settle in a manner that goes well.
My point is that being so deathly afraid of them that you gimp yourself is causing us to be in a constant state of loss, or more importantly stagnation. While we bicker amongst ourselves about how to not be a "bad white" the other races are happy to close ranks, go full tribalism, and get shit done. The followthrough on my point is maybe their tactics are effective, not morally or logically correct. Or at the very least they are at least getting somewhere, while we just keep ceding ground.
However, one thing stands out that needs to be addressed.
Candace Owens was a Leftist who wanted to create a literal Social Credit system for America before all her fellow Leftists attacked her for it, during which time she magically reinvented herself as this staunch conservative anti-wokester who basically within months 180'd on her prior beliefs. But magically in doing so, she instantly was getting paid for talks and became super famous while before she was a literal nobody. KIA chronicled the entire thing back in the day because of how incredibly retarded she was, until months later she was some T_D darling.
Saying what other people want to hear, while getting promoted because you work as the "diversity shield" is not a "high quality" individual. There are infinite number of high quality black people who would make better examples than a meme person.
Here is one link. If you search her name there are dozens of threads from the time.
And anything is easy when you make up big numbers and phrase it in a way that supports your thesis.
30 points average IQ isn't that much? 30 points is the difference between indoor plumbing and squalor. There's this neat little thing called an IQ threshold. See, the relationship between your ability to contribute to society and your IQ isn't linear. Whites, for instance, have lower average IQs than Jews or Asians. But look at white societies. Do they appear lacking? Blacks are only, what, one standard deviation below whites, but this differential is sufficient to generate an enormous cultural disparity - and that disparity is not equalled by the differences between white and Asian cultures.
Long story short: clearly none of this shit works the way you think it does.
IQ isn't really a single measurement. The high Jewish IQ is verbal. They're a bit above average at non-verbal, and below average with spatial reasoning. Good at talking in circles, but practical application of theory to the real world isn't a strong suit. On average.
More about having a stable, high trust society than any individual judgements.
If 1:1000 people in a population are shit, they can still build a great deal of social trust. If 1:100 (or 3:10 where you put it, though it's probably more like 1:5) are shit, trust is going to be much more difficult to build and maintain. Further, any non-homogeneous society experiences faction, though that can be compensated for if they're ethnically very similar and assimilate over time.
intraracial
For the second part, I'd say lets stay away from Jews for now, since those practices aren't technically criminal, there aren't good sources of statistical information, and all we can do is look at incomplete secondary information that just correlates to their occupation and compensation.
Yeah, if you blame black people for everything, white women will stop backstabbing people for fun. That's totally how it works.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Removed