And the Beautiful Ones of the Rat/Mouse "utopias", too.
And you can't kill "thoughtcrime" because thought doesn't need phonemes to work. They should really watch that thing where instructions are no longer in actual language, they're just funny little caveman type pictograms .... no words at all ... what a way to retrain thought.
No, you can't eliminate thought by destroying words. If the lack of words meant lack of corresponding thought, new words would never have been created. Thoughts came first.
But, if you remove words from the language, expressing those thought to others becomes much more slow and difficult. All the vocabulary around those ideas must be coined and spread to others again to allow those ideas to spread.
Destroying words is a very helpful tool for a totalitarian regime to curb dissent when nobody has the vocabulary to even describe totalitarianism.
No, you can't eliminate thought by destroying words
Thought represents response to what form perceives from flow (perception of inspiration) or what is offered to form by other form as suggested beliefs; which includes words.
You only think in words; because you choose to believe how others define those words for you. This represents a corruption of communication that causes the ego; the inner monologue; based on upheld words.
Nature does not communicate itself through words; it communicates flow to form as inspiration to our senses. What we sense is the momentum of motion aka form within flow. All words ignore that; which is what allows the few who suggest words as definitions for reality to the many; to control their perception of reality through fictitious words.
new words would never have been created
We cannot create new; only transmute out of all that already exist aka shaping form within flow. Try to come up with a new thought without utilizing inspiration from all that already is...you can't.
Thoughts came first.
That's your belief in creation out of nothing; which ignores being within everything. Information comes first (ALL potentiality); which then causes internal loss aka motion (flow); which causes momentum (form); within which ALL potentiality (flow) segregates into individual ONE potential (each of us). This is how ONE can perceive from (input); build choice based comprehension of (processing), and set actions into (output) ALL as form within flow.
expressing those thought to others becomes much more slow and difficult
Form represents the expression of flow; and flow defines the velocity (motion) to the resistance (momentum) of form. Ignorance thereof causes lack of comprehension; which in return makes perceiving and processing seem slow and difficult.
All the vocabulary around those ideas must be coined and spread to others again to allow those ideas to spread.
That's called idolatry. How is it that reality can establish you; but that you need others to define reality for you to be able to operate within it? How is it that no other lifeforms have problems perceiving; comprehending and acting upon "grass" without anyone telling them that it's called "grass"?
Could it be that reality defines itself through flow, and that comprehending this represents self sustenance for the form within aka increasing ONEs comprehension (potential) to ALL perceived (potentiality)?
when nobody has the vocabulary to even describe totalitarianism.
Notice the -ism at the end there? That represents consent by free will of chocie to believe the suggested definitions of others...made by their free will of choice. They lack the ability to describe; because they believe the descriptions of others which corrupts their own comprehension of reality to whatever those others want them to believe.
Language does not represents communication between ALL and ONE; it represents the suggested spell-craft from ONE to other ONEs, and it requires belief; faith; submission; consent by free will of choice to work. Meanwhile; nature demands adaptation to inspiration; not consent to believe suggested information. Nature does not brand itself through words; because affixed words ignore the constant change of flow.
Words are not a magical entity formed through a social democratic process. Word are a useful tool to formulate and convey information. That information relates to concepts. Concepts very much exist in the real world and pertain to the real world, not a magical fairy-land.
What we perceive (out of which we conceive) is not communicated to us as information aka it doesn't tell you what it is. It is communicating inspiration to our senses; so that our free will of choice can build our comprehension out of it. What we sense is the movement of form within flow aka we perceive things within motion as inspiration for adaptation.
Slapping a label on it (words; brands; idols) represents ignoring the flow that moves the form. Flow represents both growth and loss for form, and being form within flow represents the response to the choice between both... need (self sustenance) or want (ignorance).
As for information... ONE perceives inspiration from ALL (perception); Ones free will of choice (adherence or ignorance) then transmutes it into comprehend information. Choice makes what ONE comprehends of ALL perceived. Furthermore; ALL information is predefined (potentiality); ONEs comprehension represents the self defined potential to it.
No, I don't mean a video, I mean the phenomenon; just assembled a wood barbeque the other day where the only actual words in the instruction booklet was the make and model of the bbq itself. I remember when instruction manuals had, well, instructions written out in English (or some semblance of it, if it came from Japan.) Words have been disappearing from signs since the 1970s. You know bathrooms would actually SAY "Men" and "Women" on them? That was about the first thing to get replaced with caveman drawings, bathroom signs.
You mean like IKEA instructions? I really hate those. Most of the time they're fine, but the one time something becomes ambiguous is the time you wish it would use actual freaking words to clarify but no it's a just a cartoon man holding a board and shrugging like he doesn't even know what to do either.
I remember Jay Leno showing some kind of airplane instructions that were just drawings, and totally looked like it was saying "Do not use your laser vision on the jet engines, they will catch fire."
Anyway, they're just training people to do their thoughtcrime in caveman drawings that only maybe an in-group with a shared in-group culture can understand.
And the Beautiful Ones of the Rat/Mouse "utopias", too.
And you can't kill "thoughtcrime" because thought doesn't need phonemes to work. They should really watch that thing where instructions are no longer in actual language, they're just funny little caveman type pictograms .... no words at all ... what a way to retrain thought.
No, you can't eliminate thought by destroying words. If the lack of words meant lack of corresponding thought, new words would never have been created. Thoughts came first.
But, if you remove words from the language, expressing those thought to others becomes much more slow and difficult. All the vocabulary around those ideas must be coined and spread to others again to allow those ideas to spread.
Destroying words is a very helpful tool for a totalitarian regime to curb dissent when nobody has the vocabulary to even describe totalitarianism.
Thought represents response to what form perceives from flow (perception of inspiration) or what is offered to form by other form as suggested beliefs; which includes words.
You only think in words; because you choose to believe how others define those words for you. This represents a corruption of communication that causes the ego; the inner monologue; based on upheld words.
Nature does not communicate itself through words; it communicates flow to form as inspiration to our senses. What we sense is the momentum of motion aka form within flow. All words ignore that; which is what allows the few who suggest words as definitions for reality to the many; to control their perception of reality through fictitious words.
We cannot create new; only transmute out of all that already exist aka shaping form within flow. Try to come up with a new thought without utilizing inspiration from all that already is...you can't.
That's your belief in creation out of nothing; which ignores being within everything. Information comes first (ALL potentiality); which then causes internal loss aka motion (flow); which causes momentum (form); within which ALL potentiality (flow) segregates into individual ONE potential (each of us). This is how ONE can perceive from (input); build choice based comprehension of (processing), and set actions into (output) ALL as form within flow.
Form represents the expression of flow; and flow defines the velocity (motion) to the resistance (momentum) of form. Ignorance thereof causes lack of comprehension; which in return makes perceiving and processing seem slow and difficult.
That's called idolatry. How is it that reality can establish you; but that you need others to define reality for you to be able to operate within it? How is it that no other lifeforms have problems perceiving; comprehending and acting upon "grass" without anyone telling them that it's called "grass"?
Could it be that reality defines itself through flow, and that comprehending this represents self sustenance for the form within aka increasing ONEs comprehension (potential) to ALL perceived (potentiality)?
Notice the -ism at the end there? That represents consent by free will of chocie to believe the suggested definitions of others...made by their free will of choice. They lack the ability to describe; because they believe the descriptions of others which corrupts their own comprehension of reality to whatever those others want them to believe.
Language does not represents communication between ALL and ONE; it represents the suggested spell-craft from ONE to other ONEs, and it requires belief; faith; submission; consent by free will of choice to work. Meanwhile; nature demands adaptation to inspiration; not consent to believe suggested information. Nature does not brand itself through words; because affixed words ignore the constant change of flow.
Words are not a magical entity formed through a social democratic process. Word are a useful tool to formulate and convey information. That information relates to concepts. Concepts very much exist in the real world and pertain to the real world, not a magical fairy-land.
What we perceive (out of which we conceive) is not communicated to us as information aka it doesn't tell you what it is. It is communicating inspiration to our senses; so that our free will of choice can build our comprehension out of it. What we sense is the movement of form within flow aka we perceive things within motion as inspiration for adaptation.
Slapping a label on it (words; brands; idols) represents ignoring the flow that moves the form. Flow represents both growth and loss for form, and being form within flow represents the response to the choice between both... need (self sustenance) or want (ignorance).
As for information... ONE perceives inspiration from ALL (perception); Ones free will of choice (adherence or ignorance) then transmutes it into comprehend information. Choice makes what ONE comprehends of ALL perceived. Furthermore; ALL information is predefined (potentiality); ONEs comprehension represents the self defined potential to it.
sounds interesting, can you link me?
No, I don't mean a video, I mean the phenomenon; just assembled a wood barbeque the other day where the only actual words in the instruction booklet was the make and model of the bbq itself. I remember when instruction manuals had, well, instructions written out in English (or some semblance of it, if it came from Japan.) Words have been disappearing from signs since the 1970s. You know bathrooms would actually SAY "Men" and "Women" on them? That was about the first thing to get replaced with caveman drawings, bathroom signs.
You mean like IKEA instructions? I really hate those. Most of the time they're fine, but the one time something becomes ambiguous is the time you wish it would use actual freaking words to clarify but no it's a just a cartoon man holding a board and shrugging like he doesn't even know what to do either.
Yes, the IKEA gene seems to be spreading.
I remember Jay Leno showing some kind of airplane instructions that were just drawings, and totally looked like it was saying "Do not use your laser vision on the jet engines, they will catch fire."
Anyway, they're just training people to do their thoughtcrime in caveman drawings that only maybe an in-group with a shared in-group culture can understand.