The incident report says they cut in front of the mother, she flipped them off, they then pulled out again and slipped in behind her and shot through the back of her car. They definitely saw her.
And given the constant hate vocally expressed towards white men and women it's not even safe to say them seeing it was a white chick didn't influence their choice to shoot at her.
Well yeah, that's kinda the point of binary probabilities, but the only definitive that's been offered in this thread was a claim it's definitely not racism. So that's the hyperbole that needed specifically correcting.
But sure, you can finish spelling out 2+2=4 if you're worried people can't do it themselves I guess.
Agreed. This is probably not a hate crime, it's just lunatics who shot at a car and hit a child.
I wouldn't be surprised if the two suspects had no idea who was driving the car.
The incident report says they cut in front of the mother, she flipped them off, they then pulled out again and slipped in behind her and shot through the back of her car. They definitely saw her.
And given the constant hate vocally expressed towards white men and women it's not even safe to say them seeing it was a white chick didn't influence their choice to shoot at her.
It's also not safe to say that it did.
???
Well yeah, that's kinda the point of binary probabilities, but the only definitive that's been offered in this thread was a claim it's definitely not racism. So that's the hyperbole that needed specifically correcting.
But sure, you can finish spelling out 2+2=4 if you're worried people can't do it themselves I guess.
You're arguing for something that we both know you can't prove, but you're not treating it as one.