Well yeah, that's kinda the point of binary probabilities, but the only definitive that's been offered in this thread was a claim it's definitely not racism. So that's the hyperbole that needed specifically correcting.
But sure, you can finish spelling out 2+2=4 if you're worried people can't do it themselves I guess.
I'm very confused about what you think is going on here. I pointed out that the "definitely not a hate crime or racism" claim is very much unfounded.
The proof of which was already on the person making the claim anyway, but I listed why the perpetrators would've had to have clearly seen the person they shot at before they made the choice to shoot, based on the chain of the events in the reports, as a little bit of extra disproving for the sub claim that they probably didn't even know who they were shooting at. I didn't claim at any point that it definitely was racism, just that blithely claiming it definitely wasn't racism was just a symptom of a bad case of head-ass-occlusion.
It's also not safe to say that it did.
???
Well yeah, that's kinda the point of binary probabilities, but the only definitive that's been offered in this thread was a claim it's definitely not racism. So that's the hyperbole that needed specifically correcting.
But sure, you can finish spelling out 2+2=4 if you're worried people can't do it themselves I guess.
You're arguing for something that we both know you can't prove, but you're not treating it as one.
I'm very confused about what you think is going on here. I pointed out that the "definitely not a hate crime or racism" claim is very much unfounded.
The proof of which was already on the person making the claim anyway, but I listed why the perpetrators would've had to have clearly seen the person they shot at before they made the choice to shoot, based on the chain of the events in the reports, as a little bit of extra disproving for the sub claim that they probably didn't even know who they were shooting at. I didn't claim at any point that it definitely was racism, just that blithely claiming it definitely wasn't racism was just a symptom of a bad case of head-ass-occlusion.
Yeah, and I never said it was definitely not a hate crime. I said it probably wasn't.