I'll take that as you're still not going to read it.
It did pass my screen, and I wasn't the slightest bit impressed. I'll do you one better and thoroughly refute it for you, how about that?
It's what they fall back on when you point out that all changing the law to remove gendered references would do, is remove women's legal "right" to discriminate directly against men, which is not afforded to us against women.
Only when those men are mutilated transvestites.
They're scared of trans ideology because it can beat them.
Oh God, earlier you tried to ally yourself with drug dealers murdering a black woman, now you're trying to ally with this group of degenerates?
If it can beat 'them', why are 95%+ of feminists on the side of the degenerates? Exactly.
The rainbow mafia have never lost, and I suspect women's groups have realised how fucked they are, with opposition they can't use their media assets to smear.
So the rainbow mafia outranks women. Good to see you realize it. Though it is just transvestites, not gay men. Blacks and Muslims also outrank women.
Removing all gender from law would not just mean trans ideologues would be allowed, but everyone. The idea of a single gender space would be criminalised, which women did to everyone else in the UK around a decade ago.
Anyone who prevents a Future is Female takeover is useful in some way.
Because anti-trans feminists only start to exist when all MRA opposition is soundly defeated, demoralized and/or neutered by feminist plants.
It's not that simple. They could win. They just can't use the same tactics they use against us. They actually have to win on the merit of their arguments, against a system they asked for to crush us.
Removing all gender from law would not just mean trans ideologues would be allowed, but everyone.
Incorrect. That is your own fantasy yet again. What is happening is that disfigured transvestites are added to the category of 'women', and no more than that. In some cases, they are taking it so far that you can simply identify as a woman, and in those cases, if you can get away with identifying as a 'woman', then you can take advantage of those scholarship as well.
The idea of a single gender space would be criminalised
I don't really want hairy, mutilated men to enter women's locker rooms.
Because anti-trans feminists only start to exist when all MRA opposition is soundly defeated, demoralized and/or neutered by feminist plants.
You just say stuff. None of it is based on fact. Instead, you adjust facts to try to fit your ideology, like when you claimed 20% of white boys are aborted for sex selection purposes and then replaced by illegal immigrants to prevent anyone from noticing.
In reality, 'transgenderism' wasn't a thing that was pushed on us until a few years ago. So it makes sense.
They just can't use the same tactics they use against us.
And I don't want women entering my workplace (don't trust them not to try and get me fired) , schools full of small boys or the hospital I go to get treated if I get injured (don't trust them not to attempt to kill me.) Life is tough.
Are we just going to ignore that feminists were allied with trans ideology up until men's rights finally got borderline criminalised? That happened in the UK, TERFs only appeared after they took complete victory.
Well, I don't share your all-consuming hatred, so I don't regard 51% of the population suffering as a good thing.
And I don't want women entering my workplace (don't trust them not to try and get me fired) ,
Your paranoia is definitely a reason to deny women jobs.
or the hospital I go to get treated if I get injured (don't trust them not to attempt to kill me.) Life is tough.
But one is based on reality, and the other on abject lunacy and paranoia. Women shouldn't have to undress in front of men, particularly degenerates. Your delusions of that waminz trying to kill you is going to be disregarded as what it is, the ravings of a madman.
Are we just going to ignore that feminists were allied with trans ideology
No, that is just your inability to see distinctions. It's the intersectionalists, whose censorship you cheer at every turn, who were allied with trans ideology.
That happened in the UK, TERFs only appeared after they took complete victory.
Again, you just ignored the counterpoint. 'Transgenderism' wasn't even a thing until a few years ago, at least mainstream.
It did pass my screen, and I wasn't the slightest bit impressed. I'll do you one better and thoroughly refute it for you, how about that?
Only when those men are mutilated transvestites.
Oh God, earlier you tried to ally yourself with drug dealers murdering a black woman, now you're trying to ally with this group of degenerates?
If it can beat 'them', why are 95%+ of feminists on the side of the degenerates? Exactly.
So the rainbow mafia outranks women. Good to see you realize it. Though it is just transvestites, not gay men. Blacks and Muslims also outrank women.
Removing all gender from law would not just mean trans ideologues would be allowed, but everyone. The idea of a single gender space would be criminalised, which women did to everyone else in the UK around a decade ago.
Anyone who prevents a Future is Female takeover is useful in some way.
Because anti-trans feminists only start to exist when all MRA opposition is soundly defeated, demoralized and/or neutered by feminist plants.
It's not that simple. They could win. They just can't use the same tactics they use against us. They actually have to win on the merit of their arguments, against a system they asked for to crush us.
Incorrect. That is your own fantasy yet again. What is happening is that disfigured transvestites are added to the category of 'women', and no more than that. In some cases, they are taking it so far that you can simply identify as a woman, and in those cases, if you can get away with identifying as a 'woman', then you can take advantage of those scholarship as well.
I don't really want hairy, mutilated men to enter women's locker rooms.
You just say stuff. None of it is based on fact. Instead, you adjust facts to try to fit your ideology, like when you claimed 20% of white boys are aborted for sex selection purposes and then replaced by illegal immigrants to prevent anyone from noticing.
In reality, 'transgenderism' wasn't a thing that was pushed on us until a few years ago. So it makes sense.
And why is that?
Well, at least women lose out.
And I don't want women entering my workplace (don't trust them not to try and get me fired) , schools full of small boys or the hospital I go to get treated if I get injured (don't trust them not to attempt to kill me.) Life is tough.
Are we just going to ignore that feminists were allied with trans ideology up until men's rights finally got borderline criminalised? That happened in the UK, TERFs only appeared after they took complete victory.
Well, I don't share your all-consuming hatred, so I don't regard 51% of the population suffering as a good thing.
Your paranoia is definitely a reason to deny women jobs.
But one is based on reality, and the other on abject lunacy and paranoia. Women shouldn't have to undress in front of men, particularly degenerates. Your delusions of that waminz trying to kill you is going to be disregarded as what it is, the ravings of a madman.
No, that is just your inability to see distinctions. It's the intersectionalists, whose censorship you cheer at every turn, who were allied with trans ideology.
Again, you just ignored the counterpoint. 'Transgenderism' wasn't even a thing until a few years ago, at least mainstream.