I love that you think you are superior to Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, Glenn Loury and others. You do have to be an absolute moron to want to keep your pink-haired, tranvestite white SJWs, and throwing out these, but it's your loss. I'll be giving them a warm welcome - most of the others, not so much.
And I appreciate him as an individual, but how many of his own people has he turned towards not being moronic?
None, or close to none; the black aggregate calls any of their own who doesn’t reside on their plantation of ignorance a race traitor. They revel in their backwards way of life.
Should we have to suffer ten thousand Jamals and Shaniquas for every Candice Owens?
Taking hyperbolic rhetoric concerning a macro level issue at face value
Is it hyperbolic? Should we not believe that there could be anyone who could mean that seriously?
Like people have their list of "based blacks" ready, which is pathetic to consider.
I have my list of 'American thinkers who are worth giving the time of day'. Since I am mainly concerned with IDPol, that list is disproportionately black.
Nobody made any such claim. I absorb as much Thomas Sowell and Glenn Loury as I possibly can and they're criminally unknown national treasures.
But the woke left has made it pretty clear to me that no matter how much progress is made, they'll always be there to pick at old wounds to divide people, and this one is too obvious and sensitive to be left alone.
If I had a wand that I could wave to just magically divide everyone, I'd regretfully take the sacrifice of the Sowells and Lourys to get rid of the Sharptons and Khendis in the process. They're not worth the cost, particularly when a large part of what makes them so special is that they're good at analyzing said cost.
The guy I'm replying to specifically said "ALL", making sure that there is no ambiguity that there may be even some exceptions. That specifically was what I was taking issue with.
But the woke left has made it pretty clear to me that no matter how much progress is made, they'll always be there to pick at old wounds to divide people, and this one is too obvious and sensitive to be left alone.
Correct.
If I had a wand that I could wave to just magically divide everyone, I'd regretfully take the sacrifice of the Sowells and Lourys to get rid of the Sharptons and Khendis in the process. They're not worth the cost, particularly when a large part of what makes them so special is that they're good at analyzing said cost.
This is a more intelligent comment, than one saying "erryone git out if you're black, ALL". Frankly, I am not unhappy that this population as a whole (good and bad) is not in Europe, but my main objection would be to the injustice of such a thing.
It would stop whites from being excluded from COVID relief packages
A white nationalist Stormfag justice would do that? Sorry to break it to you, but I'm 100% sure on what side Clarence Thomas will be on that.
As annoying as danger hairs are, they're not the ones that make vast swathes of cities like Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore, etc. uninhabitable.
It's not cities being uninhabitable that destroys civilization. There's been plenty of that before. An ideology that axes foundational civilizational values is what destroys it.
I never had to move because my "danger hair" neighbors were stealing everything
Funny, you will get fired because your dangerhair neighbors are ratting you out for your opinions. Not to mention the fact that it is your dangerhair friends who burn down stores after their allies have looted them.
The people who annoy you are worse than murderers.
It's not about annoying, it's about what is a threat to civilization.
I love that you think you are superior to Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, Glenn Loury and others. You do have to be an absolute moron to want to keep your pink-haired, tranvestite white SJWs, and throwing out these, but it's your loss. I'll be giving them a warm welcome - most of the others, not so much.
And I appreciate him as an individual, but how many of his own people has he turned towards not being moronic?
None, or close to none; the black aggregate calls any of their own who doesn’t reside on their plantation of ignorance a race traitor. They revel in their backwards way of life.
Should we have to suffer ten thousand Jamals and Shaniquas for every Candice Owens?
Is it hyperbolic? Should we not believe that there could be anyone who could mean that seriously?
I have my list of 'American thinkers who are worth giving the time of day'. Since I am mainly concerned with IDPol, that list is disproportionately black.
Nobody made any such claim. I absorb as much Thomas Sowell and Glenn Loury as I possibly can and they're criminally unknown national treasures.
But the woke left has made it pretty clear to me that no matter how much progress is made, they'll always be there to pick at old wounds to divide people, and this one is too obvious and sensitive to be left alone.
If I had a wand that I could wave to just magically divide everyone, I'd regretfully take the sacrifice of the Sowells and Lourys to get rid of the Sharptons and Khendis in the process. They're not worth the cost, particularly when a large part of what makes them so special is that they're good at analyzing said cost.
The guy I'm replying to specifically said "ALL", making sure that there is no ambiguity that there may be even some exceptions. That specifically was what I was taking issue with.
Correct.
This is a more intelligent comment, than one saying "erryone git out if you're black, ALL". Frankly, I am not unhappy that this population as a whole (good and bad) is not in Europe, but my main objection would be to the injustice of such a thing.
Well, it is unforgivable that they are not using their magical powers to "stop"... checks notes... hardened criminals.
No, that's as retarded as Social Justice.
Except that the danger-hairs are destroying your civilization, not the Tyrones.
By that standard, what good are you?
A white nationalist Stormfag justice would do that? Sorry to break it to you, but I'm 100% sure on what side Clarence Thomas will be on that.
It's not cities being uninhabitable that destroys civilization. There's been plenty of that before. An ideology that axes foundational civilizational values is what destroys it.
Funny, you will get fired because your dangerhair neighbors are ratting you out for your opinions. Not to mention the fact that it is your dangerhair friends who burn down stores after their allies have looted them.
It's not about annoying, it's about what is a threat to civilization.