Was sent this ~9 minute interview earlier today:
https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge
Which is also here, and is backed up here.
And a clip of him saying the most revealing bit is here, and, is backed up here.
This Global News (MSM) interviewer had Dr. Bryam Bridle on, and he made some big claims. He said that he has all of the research papers to back it, and, that he plans on compiling that into a document in the near future.
For a quote of some of the claims, see here, which was pulled from here.
After the end of the interview, the host naturally tries to do some damage control, "your opinion is just one of many". Same type of person who would say "trust the science", only to ignore it. I digress.
His university webpage is here.
We've been trying to find the papers that he mentioned, without any luck thus far.
Does anyone happen to know which papers he refers to?
They are also talking about it at these two forums here and here, with no study linked there either.
Cross-posted from here.
Edit:
The professor has begun releasing his materials to people who have contacted him. He said that there is more to come, for anyone who asks him.
I trust in the scientific principle, which is why I haven't been vaccinated and have yet to arrive any compelling reason to change my mind.
Unfortunately, some members of my family have been willing guinea pigs, 1 condescendingly implying that there is 'misinformation' out there (in respect to anti-scamdemic vax sentiment)...doesn't exactly feel great to be potentially right on this topic.
Edit: Looking forward to the study and continued investigation from actually good-faith scientists.
Thank you. He has begun releasing some of the files. See above for the links
YT comments are pretty good on this one:
Thank you. He has begun releasing some of the files. See above for the links
Are you saying rushing it out the door for emotional satisfaction in 1/10th the usual qualification time over an illness with a 99.95% survival rate was a BAD IDEA??
And btw this is best case, assuming it's not supposed to kill or sterilize people en masse
It's almost like experimental medical tech has the potential to be absolutely disastrous for the human body or something.
Wasn't there a study showing the AstraZenica and Johnson&Johnson vaccines were the most effective at producing the spike protiens? The same ones that make headlines for causing blood clots and killing people?
Sounds vaguely familiar. With that said, all roads lead back to the mRNA vaccines, at least in Canada. They want us to have rather than AZ or J&J.
On a related note, the professor has begun releasing some of the files. See above for the links.
Isn't that the whole point of vaccines? To get spike proteins in your blood? It seems like the issue is they found the spike proteins themselves are harmful but now they are trying to claim the spike proteins on either the viruses injected with the J&J vaccine or produced by your own cells with the mRNA vaccines somehow aren't harmful which is fucking ridiculous; they're the same fucking protein.
The way he described it in the interview, when you get a typical vaccine, like a flu vaccine, the small dose of the virus remains in the muscle tissue of your shoulder. Expanding from that premise, I would assume that for such a vaccine, it wouldn't matter if the virus was localized or across the entire body (via the bloodstream), your body will recognize it as a threat, fight it, develop anti bodies, which lasts beyond the virus being in your body (hence natural immunity).
There might be risks for the flu vaccine to introduce flu virus into the bloodstream, perhaps with the brain-blood barrier. Not sure.
The professor is claiming that this is meant to also be the case for the mRNA vaccines by the sounds of it. It's meant to be localized to your muscle in your shoulder. My educated guess (which I would like the verify or prove false later) is that the mRNA vaccine would then release spike proteins in that localized area (or was meant to), your body was meant to learn to fight those, and so forth.
And yeah, you make a good point about J&J vs. the mRNA jab. It seems to me that the mRNA jabs pose a greater risk, given the unknown medical technology.
On a related note, he has begun releasing some of the files. See above for the links.