The state of young women
(mobile.twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (150)
sorted by:
And why is it unreasonable? Just because the life is less developed?
Because it's basically indistinguishable from a bacterium, yes.
Are you retarded? From moments after a sperm fertilizes an egg and the genetic material organizes itself you are a distinct human being unlike any other, and not even resembling a bacteria, etc.
Clearly, you're retarded, as you did not even read what I wrote. Functionally, they're identical to bacteria.
Scientifically, you are completely idiotic. I am a molecular biologist, and if one of my students said something so idiotic I would send them back to remidal instruction.
No they are not. Bacteria beget bacteria, and most free living independent of some host organism. If there is bacteria in a woman's uterus her body will undertake to destroy it, while it supports and nourishes a human zygote.
How absolutely horrifying.
What about the present? A fertilized egg cannot see, think or hear. It has no consciousness. That is the point.
Those are all false, we have know for a long time that within the first two weeks of pregnancy a fetus has a neural spline. Within those same two weeks a female fetus will have already accrued all the genetic material for her eggs, that means within a month of being pregnant your potential grandchildren are already developed. This idea that because a fetus is as small as a bacterium at one minute point it should be treated as one is as ludicrous as saying we should give human rights to staphylococcus bacterium, you are completely ignoring potential and predicated development.
So conscienceness is your magic point where you become a human being? If so, when you go to sleep and wake up you are transitioning from being a non-human to a human.