The abstract uses the phrase "advocate for radical policy changes". Which in context means "opposes public health officials calling for shutting down the economy, locking people in their homes, and completely restructuring society". Imagine being so "radical" as to think people ought to have lived 2020 and 2021 in much the same way as they lived 2019.
The whole social distancing paradigm is a radical departure from established norms and would have been considered unorthodox to scientists in the medical community just 5 years ago.
I still say the biggest surprise I saw was someone I know who did their PHD on the Spanish flu concluding masks didn't do anything calling for masks a year ago...
Of course got unfriended when I linked them to a copy of their own paper on the subject...
The abstract uses the phrase "advocate for radical policy changes". Which in context means "opposes public health officials calling for shutting down the economy, locking people in their homes, and completely restructuring society". Imagine being so "radical" as to think people ought to have lived 2020 and 2021 in much the same way as they lived 2019.
The whole social distancing paradigm is a radical departure from established norms and would have been considered unorthodox to scientists in the medical community just 5 years ago.
I still say the biggest surprise I saw was someone I know who did their PHD on the Spanish flu concluding masks didn't do anything calling for masks a year ago...
Of course got unfriended when I linked them to a copy of their own paper on the subject...
Pretty worrying to know cultists like that are the ones making all the decisions tbh
I presume any scientists in the medical community today are simply keeping their heads down while the activists have the run of the place...