N-n-n-nooOoIOooOoo you can't point that out! Stormfag REEEEEEEEEE
Nevermind the fact that we're on KiA2 because KiA1 wanted to stifle all discussion of the greater culture war that people in GG noticed while going after games journalists. You can't Notice these interesting coincidences here!!
Most of it's because we're all tired of the same fucking schtick forever. We get it, you think it's the Jews and nothing ever else because you believe in no other concept of power dynamics beyond eternal race war and you're upset because you think the Jews are winning and the whites are loosing.
We got the fucking message, and you're still wrong.
The part after this is where someone calls me a jew for disagreeing.
No I don't think it's the jews and absolutely nothing else. I just find it interesting how the discussion is a mind killer for people here.
Hmmm there's clearly a coordinated push that's racially and politically motivated to disenfranchise conservatives, whites, patriots, etc. But the second you mention that a disproportionate amount of people pushing this are the same ethnicity, which also happens to have its own ethnostate already, suddenly its some vast conspiracy? And you can't talk about it anymore?
Like Elon Musk asking "who controls the media" meaning just the rich, but every journo immediately took it as an antisemitic attack. Real interesting
Are there other explanations for why Jews have such disproportionate power over media and why it's used to attack whites? Of course, but shrieking like a harpy and insulting people for pointing out cohencidences only drives people further into believing that. You're not changing their minds by shrieking "REEEEEE STORMFAG! THE JEWS DO NOTHING WRONG!" Especially when you're shrieking at the wrong target.
I'm here for open discussion of any and every possibility no matter how distasteful. I only see Tony sperging out at Impossibro for replacing the jews in stormfag thinking with women; when really if you want to be ideologically consistent, you should be too. As well as anyone else who shits themselves at the mention of Judaism. But no, the shrieking only comes out when it's specifically jews mentioned.
I just find it interesting how the discussion is a mind killer for people here.
That's like saying someone is being closed minded when don't want to put their hand on a hot stove. No one's being "closed minded" to you and other's like you ranting about the Jews. It's the same shit it always has been, it's always wrong, and it always results in someone explaining why Hitler was a good boy who dindu nuffin and was just on his way to college, and he totally wasn't a Leftist. ... so in the end you still end up promoting racial justice, leftism, and the balkanization of the country.
If you were so ideologically inclined to cover the issue, and not just another person literally blaming the jews for their life not being together.
You might as well claim I'm a sex traitor who's not recognizing the pattern of women's cabal against men when TheImpossible1 starts up.
Are there other explanations for why Jews have such disproportionate power over media
I could go over the book "Immigration And Culture" with you, but you'd have to be willing to listen. Disparity does not equal Discrimination.
why it's used to attack whites?
White Leftism, like many European ideologies including Catholocism, builds off of shame. Some people can be shamed into obedience. It's a collectivist mindset that continental Europe has had for a very long time.
Of course, but shrieking like a harpy and insulting people for pointing out cohencidences only drives people further into believing that.
Only because they are promoting self-victimization in order for them to feel like they need the protection of white racialists, like all other ones.
You're not changing their minds by shrieking "REEEEEE STORMFAG! THE JEWS DO NOTHING WRONG!"
Nothing's going to change their minds until they change their emotion about the thing. This is the same issue that I have with Holocaust Denial. It's purely motivated reasoning. I shouldn't have to explain to a Holocaust "skeptic" that there was more than one death camp, or that the Germans stopped shooting people in favor of gas trucks. But, that's the level of ignorance tied to an emotion that happens with every conversation about the Holocaust. If it were emotionless, it would be a useful, but fairly academic discussion.
But it's not, because the argument isn't really "The facts of different issues within the Holocaust are up for debate." The argument is: "The jews lied to me."
And it goes the same way every time. It's always the Jews fault, it's always about how the world is defined solely along racial tribalism, it's always that the Jews are uniquely the most dangerous and subversive race, it's always that there's an evil about them genetically, and it always ends with White Socialism is the only way for progress.
No, the racialism has to get confronted early and often when it's getting pushed early and often. It's no fucking different from going to a Leftist sub, talking about a police shooting, and some asshole saying, "If he was black, he would have been killed. Did you know police are slave patrols?"
It's Leftist subversion and there needs to be a response to it. But how many times to I have to explain that the police aren't slave patrols until they stop? Never. It's not based in reality, it's based in emotion.
If they want to act like an individual and listen to honest dialogue, then fine, show it to me. Apotheosis (a Christian Identity user) has. He'll rationalize his position until the cows come home, and he'll defend White Christian National Socialism and claim the Jews are innately satanic. But once I get past his first level of posturing for the crowd (because that's what his first comment will always be about), he can still have a discussion.
I only see Tony sperging out at Impossibro for replacing the jews in stormfag thinking with women; when really if you want to be ideologically consistent, you should be too.
For the most part, it's just him fucking ranting. I'd rather play with him a bit so he mellows out over time and realizes he can't blame women for all of his problems. It's just him, and there's not an active political push by fringe Incels to squat on boards and be particularly vile to users who disagree with them.
For example, he has never called me a gender traitor, a secret woman subverter, working on behalf of the femoid cabal, or just straight up a woman.
TheImpossible1 has the capacity for humor, and he doesn't have dozens of people prepared to jump in and rant with him, creating a hysterical environment of paranoid woman-haters.
Early life part of her wikipedia page tells you the usual.
N-n-n-nooOoIOooOoo you can't point that out! Stormfag REEEEEEEEEE
Nevermind the fact that we're on KiA2 because KiA1 wanted to stifle all discussion of the greater culture war that people in GG noticed while going after games journalists. You can't Notice these interesting coincidences here!!
Most of it's because we're all tired of the same fucking schtick forever. We get it, you think it's the Jews and nothing ever else because you believe in no other concept of power dynamics beyond eternal race war and you're upset because you think the Jews are winning and the whites are loosing.
We got the fucking message, and you're still wrong.
The part after this is where someone calls me a jew for disagreeing.
No I don't think it's the jews and absolutely nothing else. I just find it interesting how the discussion is a mind killer for people here.
Hmmm there's clearly a coordinated push that's racially and politically motivated to disenfranchise conservatives, whites, patriots, etc. But the second you mention that a disproportionate amount of people pushing this are the same ethnicity, which also happens to have its own ethnostate already, suddenly its some vast conspiracy? And you can't talk about it anymore?
Like Elon Musk asking "who controls the media" meaning just the rich, but every journo immediately took it as an antisemitic attack. Real interesting
Are there other explanations for why Jews have such disproportionate power over media and why it's used to attack whites? Of course, but shrieking like a harpy and insulting people for pointing out cohencidences only drives people further into believing that. You're not changing their minds by shrieking "REEEEEE STORMFAG! THE JEWS DO NOTHING WRONG!" Especially when you're shrieking at the wrong target.
I'm here for open discussion of any and every possibility no matter how distasteful. I only see Tony sperging out at Impossibro for replacing the jews in stormfag thinking with women; when really if you want to be ideologically consistent, you should be too. As well as anyone else who shits themselves at the mention of Judaism. But no, the shrieking only comes out when it's specifically jews mentioned.
That's like saying someone is being closed minded when don't want to put their hand on a hot stove. No one's being "closed minded" to you and other's like you ranting about the Jews. It's the same shit it always has been, it's always wrong, and it always results in someone explaining why Hitler was a good boy who dindu nuffin and was just on his way to college, and he totally wasn't a Leftist. ... so in the end you still end up promoting racial justice, leftism, and the balkanization of the country.
If you were so ideologically inclined to cover the issue, and not just another person literally blaming the jews for their life not being together.
You might as well claim I'm a sex traitor who's not recognizing the pattern of women's cabal against men when TheImpossible1 starts up.
I could go over the book "Immigration And Culture" with you, but you'd have to be willing to listen. Disparity does not equal Discrimination.
White Leftism, like many European ideologies including Catholocism, builds off of shame. Some people can be shamed into obedience. It's a collectivist mindset that continental Europe has had for a very long time.
Only because they are promoting self-victimization in order for them to feel like they need the protection of white racialists, like all other ones.
Nothing's going to change their minds until they change their emotion about the thing. This is the same issue that I have with Holocaust Denial. It's purely motivated reasoning. I shouldn't have to explain to a Holocaust "skeptic" that there was more than one death camp, or that the Germans stopped shooting people in favor of gas trucks. But, that's the level of ignorance tied to an emotion that happens with every conversation about the Holocaust. If it were emotionless, it would be a useful, but fairly academic discussion.
But it's not, because the argument isn't really "The facts of different issues within the Holocaust are up for debate." The argument is: "The jews lied to me."
And it goes the same way every time. It's always the Jews fault, it's always about how the world is defined solely along racial tribalism, it's always that the Jews are uniquely the most dangerous and subversive race, it's always that there's an evil about them genetically, and it always ends with White Socialism is the only way for progress.
No, the racialism has to get confronted early and often when it's getting pushed early and often. It's no fucking different from going to a Leftist sub, talking about a police shooting, and some asshole saying, "If he was black, he would have been killed. Did you know police are slave patrols?"
It's Leftist subversion and there needs to be a response to it. But how many times to I have to explain that the police aren't slave patrols until they stop? Never. It's not based in reality, it's based in emotion.
If they want to act like an individual and listen to honest dialogue, then fine, show it to me. Apotheosis (a Christian Identity user) has. He'll rationalize his position until the cows come home, and he'll defend White Christian National Socialism and claim the Jews are innately satanic. But once I get past his first level of posturing for the crowd (because that's what his first comment will always be about), he can still have a discussion.
For the most part, it's just him fucking ranting. I'd rather play with him a bit so he mellows out over time and realizes he can't blame women for all of his problems. It's just him, and there's not an active political push by fringe Incels to squat on boards and be particularly vile to users who disagree with them.
For example, he has never called me a gender traitor, a secret woman subverter, working on behalf of the femoid cabal, or just straight up a woman.
TheImpossible1 has the capacity for humor, and he doesn't have dozens of people prepared to jump in and rant with him, creating a hysterical environment of paranoid woman-haters.