Pissed on breadcrumbs in adherence to talmudic reasoning aka deliberately suggested contradictions to both sides of the conflict of reason (truth versus false); just to keep the belief based conflict going.
You reasoning about if it's truth or false is what represents the division tool of control for the few; who offered you the belief you're reasoning about.
If you're not mentally strong enough to question every last one of your consented to beliefs (all fiction in ignorance of reality); then at least utilize implication (if/then) over reason (truth versus false). This is also taught through the so called talmud; which represents a tool to maintain human reasoning through suggested contradictions.
Yes; the status quo of our existence represents the disorder of momentum within the order of motion aka that which is struggling to sustain itself (us); within that which is constantly moving on (reality).
You are not speaking in such a way that you can be understood.
a) how can one comprehend (understand) reality by believing another ones assumptions about it?
b) the Chauvin trial represents a pissed on breadcrumb for all those already consenting to the Floyd story. If you believe in the Floyd story then the most precious black man was murdered by a white racist cop; and if you don't believe it then a cop put down a criminal nigger. No matter which side you choose; you'll find yourself in a conflict of reason against the other side.
This conflict of reason represents a division created by a suggested belief (Floyd) which allows those who offered it to control both sides of the conflict; so no matter which side you bite in; you're gonna taste piss.
Meanwhile those with eyes to see, who don't fall as easily for the same control by suggestion scheme over and over again; they were shown a sleight of hand..."I can't breathe" leads to death; which was followed by a coincidentally totally unrelated "health" order stating to "put a mask over your nose and mouth".
Now if you reread point a) you could understand that believing either side offered does not lead to the understanding of the sleight of hand; because that would require self discernment and the use of implication (if/then) over reason (truth versus false).
In short...they offered the warning that restricting ones breathing will lead to death; then they suggested everyone to ignore that warning; which makes the whole masking consent a compliance ritual towards death over life; while ignoring the needed adherence to life over death.
tldr...if you choose to believe anything offered; then you'll find yourself in a conflict with all those who choose to not believe it. Theses conflicts (of reason) are fiction in ignorance of reality; and those who offered the beliefs you're reasoning about; control mankind through that trick.
No, because GAY, adjective - "merry; airy; jovial; sportive; frolicksome. It denotes more life and animation than cheerful"; was corrupted slowly by suggestion; which contradicts the mechanics of a sudden trap, which represents another term that was slowly being corrupted through suggestion, and that you consented to by free will of choice; which is why you believe the suggested definitions.
Who suggested to you that the solution to a perceived problem represents medicine/pharmaceuticals? Especially in the light of recent unfavorable behavior of those in adherence to the pharmaceutical cartel towards humanity as a whole...
Pissed on breadcrumbs in adherence to talmudic reasoning aka deliberately suggested contradictions to both sides of the conflict of reason (truth versus false); just to keep the belief based conflict going.
You reasoning about if it's truth or false is what represents the division tool of control for the few; who offered you the belief you're reasoning about.
If you're not mentally strong enough to question every last one of your consented to beliefs (all fiction in ignorance of reality); then at least utilize implication (if/then) over reason (truth versus false). This is also taught through the so called talmud; which represents a tool to maintain human reasoning through suggested contradictions.
Script is broken.
This poster unironically responded to Timecube posting. I have to assume illness/"clarity" of a type akin to this.
Probably just living in a higher plane of existence.
I don't consent to offered -isms.
Yes; the status quo of our existence represents the disorder of momentum within the order of motion aka that which is struggling to sustain itself (us); within that which is constantly moving on (reality).
a) how can one comprehend (understand) reality by believing another ones assumptions about it?
b) the Chauvin trial represents a pissed on breadcrumb for all those already consenting to the Floyd story. If you believe in the Floyd story then the most precious black man was murdered by a white racist cop; and if you don't believe it then a cop put down a criminal nigger. No matter which side you choose; you'll find yourself in a conflict of reason against the other side.
This conflict of reason represents a division created by a suggested belief (Floyd) which allows those who offered it to control both sides of the conflict; so no matter which side you bite in; you're gonna taste piss.
Meanwhile those with eyes to see, who don't fall as easily for the same control by suggestion scheme over and over again; they were shown a sleight of hand..."I can't breathe" leads to death; which was followed by a coincidentally totally unrelated "health" order stating to "put a mask over your nose and mouth".
Now if you reread point a) you could understand that believing either side offered does not lead to the understanding of the sleight of hand; because that would require self discernment and the use of implication (if/then) over reason (truth versus false).
In short...they offered the warning that restricting ones breathing will lead to death; then they suggested everyone to ignore that warning; which makes the whole masking consent a compliance ritual towards death over life; while ignoring the needed adherence to life over death.
tldr...if you choose to believe anything offered; then you'll find yourself in a conflict with all those who choose to not believe it. Theses conflicts (of reason) are fiction in ignorance of reality; and those who offered the beliefs you're reasoning about; control mankind through that trick.
So are traps gay or not?
No, because GAY, adjective - "merry; airy; jovial; sportive; frolicksome. It denotes more life and animation than cheerful"; was corrupted slowly by suggestion; which contradicts the mechanics of a sudden trap, which represents another term that was slowly being corrupted through suggestion, and that you consented to by free will of choice; which is why you believe the suggested definitions.
Someone forgot to take their meds today
Who suggested to you that the solution to a perceived problem represents medicine/pharmaceuticals? Especially in the light of recent unfavorable behavior of those in adherence to the pharmaceutical cartel towards humanity as a whole...