Let's have a real talk here for a second, I'll make it short and sweet:
Aside from the "don't focus on cultural Marxism, focus on ethics" crowd, we got idiots who gobble and follow shit like "kill your enemies with kindness" shit that started by a cowardly-ass pussy named Action Points. You remember him? I'm sure you don't, because he "went on a break" and now back doing content because reasons.
Why would you kiss the ass of someone who thinks you are a monster who deserves death no matter what? Lefties will NEVER like you. Never ever ever ever.
These are people who want you broke, dead, imprisoned, your kids taken from you, ostracised, on the streets, starving, beaten, etc. If you STILL want to get with them, then you are a retard. There is no middle ground with those, like what? Your house only gets sorta taken from you? You only kinda get thrown in prison for wrongthink? The horde curbstomps you only a little?
Fuck off.
Let's call them what they are - cultural terrorists.
You don't negotiate with terrorists.
Ask the tradcucks. Actually, ask the male feminists, the tradcucks will just say "because God says we should marry".
You're making a good point though, regardless of who you think is leading the left's decision making, there's no reason to expect the high road to work. There doesn't seem to be a win condition for them that isn't complete subjugation - Biden's win didn't calm them down at all.
Our mistake is to consider our opposition in the way we believe they consider us. They don't think we're just misguided or even outright wrong, they think we are subhuman and that won't change.
Ostracization is all we have left to use against them.
How do you explain the male politicians, CEOs, leaders of NGOs, etc.? Please, don't do the feminist thing and claim they are only poor, mislead victims.
Blackmail and greed.
Most of them stand to benefit from a corporate puppet leader, so they enter the pact. However, the blackmail of destroying their company with the power positions acquired keeps them in.
That's not to mention ReeeeeeeToo and whatever Ghislaine Maxwell is hiding.
Seriously, you are exactly like a feminist, only in reverse directions. A man who is on the left does not have your best interest in his mind just because you are also a man. Convincing yourself about that won't make your life better or safer, you will just get duped the same while you feel it's somehow better.
I'm under no illusion of benevolence. Their greed drives them to support this, knowing the monetary policy will benefit them.
The inherent mistake is that leftists don't share the same system of morality as non-leftists. The leftier you go, the more the collectivist morality asserts itself.
Observe how Marx and his leftist inheritors define morality:
https://archive.ph/iEdQA https:// www. marxists. org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/
https://archive.vn/smjeB https://newdiscourses.com/2021/01/nature-pseudo-reality/
https://archive.ph/BZR9x https:// www. youtube. com/watch?v=cg-OZl5G8o8
https://archive.ph/dtoyq
https://archive.ph/sgAeu
https://archive.ph/wiTaK
https://archive.ph/fTgAU
I see "kill with kindness," or what I really prefer more "catch flies with honey" not really as how to deal with enemies but as tactics to use when you need something from acquaintances, peers, etc. Like in the workplace for example. Using those type tactics on enemies just seems stupid, as if you've gotten to the point that they are enemies, they will just take your kindness and laugh at you. You've gained nothing in your battle and just given them something they had to put no effort out for.
I have no idea who Action Points is though and don't really care. I've never at any point been a heavy consumer of that type of media a.k.a. "content." I can't remember what I never knew to begin with.
maybe i'm completly off here, but to me it seems it's one of those phrases that has being taken over by a female viewpoint.
mistaken it for 'why does the talk sudenly have to be so heated, let's talk about groceries and the weather tihihihi'
where it should mean, be stoic first, then force manners on yourself while you calmly point out the retartation in you enemies argument.
with lefties naturally they will go more beserk the more calm you stay, thus winning you the discussion in the eyes of the bystanders.
take brett kavanaugh for example, no matter him being another cuck, he was 100% right to be outraged at the hearing, at the false allegations. the only argument the cunts had was that no innocent man would rage like him.
no more examples needed.
Kindness, empathy, all of that type stuff has been taken over by that view. They use empathy all the time as if the outcome of empathy must always be pity.
I actually prefer the term civility as how to be--calm and clear headed. Not that I'm perfect at it by any means, but were talking aspirations here.
Regarding Kavanaugh, I think I actually get more angry when I'm forced to defend myself against something I didn't do than something I did. So makes sense to me.
well i'm drunk, no need to be coherent.
they use the term empathy instead of sympathy. they don't even know the difference, really.
they constantly sperg out and it's an instawin because normal folk just walk away.
when someone else does it and they know it's justified, it breaks something in them. i believe they simply panic and double triple quadruple down, because even pausing a second would mean they would be eaten alive by the woke mob themselves.
they can't reflect, they can't think. they would be instantly be devoured by their peers.
as it was said a thousand times on here, it's a deathcult...
Taking the high road just makes you easier to pull down.
Kindness only kills if it's packed in a 75 mm shell.
There is no killing with kindness. There is only resistance, or accelerationism. Perhaps the latter is the "kindness" option? Like hold every single lefty to the ideal they would have implemented as general policy? I'd want to be held to my standards, so for them to be aggressively held to theirs must be kindness, right?