Well, I didn't expect the charge, but I pulled back from that bet because I realized...women do get charged. They just usually win against the charges. Even in the UK, they get charged with murder, and win the case by claiming abuse with zero evidence.
I consider physical violence against them both morally and tactically incorrect. Why on earth would we give them a stronger claim to be victims? If incel shootings didn't exist, their dumb fuck cult wouldn't be going after "misogyny" online because everyone would see it as the transparent attack on criticism of their world order that it is.
What's the report to conviction rate again? I'm more concerned about them lying about it to kill someone in "self-defence".
Where did you get those figures? Italy reported 4 to every one woman in the first wave. I don't count the following waves as they weren't just allowed to burn through the population and also were affected by new variants of the disease.
60%? So I suppose Moderna and Pfizer don't exist? They probably just throw AZ deaths on the Covid total. Every country is banning it now, can we please stop pretending it's safe?
This goes a bit further than 'not expecting' it. You were categorically asserting that it would not happen, that it could not happen. You were challenging me to a bet, which is a curious reversal of roles, and being so sure that you said you would admit you were wrong - which you in retrospect really did not wanted to do.
Now, everything that happened is what was to be expected, except for your refusal to admit that you were very wrong.
I pulled back from that bet because I realized...women do get charged.
You didn't "pull back" at all. You do realize that you can't pull out of a bet when you realize you've lost.
They just usually win against the charges.
Do they now?
Why on earth would we give them a stronger claim to be victims?
Cause they are weak as hell.
Where did you get those figures? Italy reported 4 to every one woman in the first wave.
I don't count the following waves as they weren't just allowed to burn through the population and also were affected by new variants of the disease.
Right, you only count Italy and only the first wave, because these wahmen who created the virus to 'kill men' were only interested in how many were killed in Italy, and only during the first wave. Apparently, Mario in high school dumped them, so they really wanted to kill 70+ Italian men.
60%? So I suppose Moderna and Pfizer don't exist?
I'll remind you of what a wise man said, that people who were told they were given Moderna and Pfizer would just be given the AZ vaccine, in order to kill them.
That wise man happened to be you.
You'll make any claim that is to your benefit at that particular moment.
They probably just throw AZ deaths on the Covid total. Every country is banning it now, can we please stop pretending it's safe?
There's no such thing as safe vaccine.
If THEEEEEEEEEEEEY are all-powerful and control governments, and THEEEEEEY created this vaccine to kill men, why are governments banning this vaccine? Aren't they sabotaging their own plan?
Is Google still going to buy up AZ as a reward for killing men, as you asserted, if these insubordinate governments prevent it by banning it?
We'll see if I was wrong overall. She won't see the inside of a cell.
Italy is just the statistic I remember. Feel free to give others from that time period.
Fair point, although that was less of a prediction and more of a wild stab at trying to work out what the reason was that they allowed it to be banned. But I've had a while now and the answer is obvious.
It was allowed to kill, up until it started to kill women. That was a malfunction and all the governments banned it at once to ensure that it didn't happen again. Notice J&J didn't have anywhere near that level of hesitation, because the first death was a woman.
We'll see if I was wrong overall. She won't see the inside of a cell.
You were already wrong overall. Two of your claims were proven false, two are now pending - that the charges will be 'quietly dropped', and that she will never go to jail.
Italy is just the statistic I remember. Feel free to give others from that time period.
I am pretty sure you saw a link.
Fair point, although that was less of a prediction and more of a wild stab at trying to work out what the reason was that they allowed it to be banned. But I've had a while now and the answer is obvious.
Do tell me. What is the 'obvious' answer?
It was allowed to kill, up until it started to kill women.
You had been posting links to governments, including Denmark, banning it long before it 'started to kill women'.
That was a malfunction
So the correct function, you claim, would have been the vaccine killing only men? Is there even such a thing?
Notice J&J didn't have anywhere near that level of hesitation, because the first death was a woman.
Clearly, J&J was a vaccine developed by men to kill women.
Well, I didn't expect the charge, but I pulled back from that bet because I realized...women do get charged. They just usually win against the charges. Even in the UK, they get charged with murder, and win the case by claiming abuse with zero evidence.
I consider physical violence against them both morally and tactically incorrect. Why on earth would we give them a stronger claim to be victims? If incel shootings didn't exist, their dumb fuck cult wouldn't be going after "misogyny" online because everyone would see it as the transparent attack on criticism of their world order that it is.
What's the report to conviction rate again? I'm more concerned about them lying about it to kill someone in "self-defence".
An openly feminist woman who has a membership of a political party that is so fringe, even the UK thinks it's too far.
Where did you get those figures? Italy reported 4 to every one woman in the first wave. I don't count the following waves as they weren't just allowed to burn through the population and also were affected by new variants of the disease.
60%? So I suppose Moderna and Pfizer don't exist? They probably just throw AZ deaths on the Covid total. Every country is banning it now, can we please stop pretending it's safe?
This goes a bit further than 'not expecting' it. You were categorically asserting that it would not happen, that it could not happen. You were challenging me to a bet, which is a curious reversal of roles, and being so sure that you said you would admit you were wrong - which you in retrospect really did not wanted to do.
Now, everything that happened is what was to be expected, except for your refusal to admit that you were very wrong.
You didn't "pull back" at all. You do realize that you can't pull out of a bet when you realize you've lost.
Do they now?
Cause they are weak as hell.
https://globalhealth5050.org/the-sex-gender-and-covid-19-project/the-data-tracker/?explore=country&country=USA#search
Just an example.
Right, you only count Italy and only the first wave, because these wahmen who created the virus to 'kill men' were only interested in how many were killed in Italy, and only during the first wave. Apparently, Mario in high school dumped them, so they really wanted to kill 70+ Italian men.
I'll remind you of what a wise man said, that people who were told they were given Moderna and Pfizer would just be given the AZ vaccine, in order to kill them.
That wise man happened to be you.
You'll make any claim that is to your benefit at that particular moment.
Is Google still going to buy up AZ as a reward for killing men, as you asserted, if these insubordinate governments prevent it by banning it?
We'll see if I was wrong overall. She won't see the inside of a cell.
Italy is just the statistic I remember. Feel free to give others from that time period.
Fair point, although that was less of a prediction and more of a wild stab at trying to work out what the reason was that they allowed it to be banned. But I've had a while now and the answer is obvious.
It was allowed to kill, up until it started to kill women. That was a malfunction and all the governments banned it at once to ensure that it didn't happen again. Notice J&J didn't have anywhere near that level of hesitation, because the first death was a woman.
You were already wrong overall. Two of your claims were proven false, two are now pending - that the charges will be 'quietly dropped', and that she will never go to jail.
I am pretty sure you saw a link.
Do tell me. What is the 'obvious' answer?
You had been posting links to governments, including Denmark, banning it long before it 'started to kill women'.
So the correct function, you claim, would have been the vaccine killing only men? Is there even such a thing?
Clearly, J&J was a vaccine developed by men to kill women.
Like I said, we'll see.
Maybe, I didn't notice it.
I already said.
Scandinavia had a failed swine flu vaccine that gave kids insomnia. They were more on edge about these vaccines because of it.
Most likely, yes. It's more likely than all the Bill Gates related theories.
No, it was probably just a regular vaccine with side effects.