Will you admit that you were wrong about wahmen being all-powerful if you are wrong, or will you - yet again, as always - come up with some BS excuse for your self-sealing hypothesis?
I already said.
No, you didn't explain why THEEEEY allowed it to be banned. Unless you want to say that the fact that some women died, which is the case .
Not real brainiacs to put all their hopes of The Genocide into a product that will necessarily kill women as well and which for that reason will have to be pulled, eh?
Scandinavia had a failed swine flu vaccine that gave kids insomnia. They were more on edge about these vaccines because of it.
So the most 'female supremacist' countries were the first to ban the vaccine over men dying? And the first to ban was a country with a female PM by a Traitor Health Minister who served under a wahmen?
How does that make sense? The planners for The Genocide had not counted on the dreaded vaccines which gave kids insomnia? Poor planning.
Most likely, yes. It's more likely than all the Bill Gates related theories.
My retarded theory is less retarded than that retarded theory!
So you, being the genius that you are, think that some wahmen developed a vaccine against a virus that kills mostly men, but as it saves the lives of those countless men, made it so that it would result in a tiny number of deaths? If she were a smart planner for The Genocide, she would just not have developed the vaccine.
You will literally believe anything.
No, it was probably just a regular vaccine with side effects.
I'm sure some man was spotted in the vicinty with the vaccine was created. That would prove that it's a vaccine developed by men to kill women.
Not exactly. I'd just admit that some traits can nullify female privilege.
Yes, it was banned because it killed young women. That's exactly why. They had the families of male victims propagandise on YouTube about how safe it was before that. Zero shame.
I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on Scandinavian culture. I'm just saying that they have a history of blocking things after very few people suffer side effects.
A 20-40 year old is a far bigger threat to matriarchal tyranny than a 70+ year old. Surely I don't need to explain further than that.
No it wouldn't, because we aren't constantly caught fantasizing about killing them. The same is not true for them killing us.
I'd just admit that some traits can nullify female privilege.
So you're already coming up with some BS excuses.
Yes, it was banned because it killed young women.
What a dishonest wreck. When Denmark with its female PM banned it, you said that other countries didn't care because it only killed men. So which is it?
I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on Scandinavian culture.
No, you're only an expert on divining where the virus came from and why. Surprise, surprise, it was to kill you, as everything seems to be. Such a shock that you are still alive, with 51% of the human population trying to kill you.
A 20-40 year old is a far bigger threat to matriarchal tyranny than a 70+ year old. Surely I don't need to explain further than that.
70+ is more likely to be conservative, and more likely to vote. If it were the other way around, you would be claiming that THEEEEEEY are sparing 20-40 year old men because they are more likely to be in league with THEEEEEM.
Not to mention that you also claimed that you reconsidered, because you realized that THEEEEEEY would know that THEEEEIR killer vaccine would only kill those who trusted THEEEEEEEEM.
No it wouldn't, because we aren't constantly caught fantasizing about killing them. The same is not true for them killing us.
I'm pretty sure you do, and you hide it.
That's the argument you use, right? From now on, I'm going to use your own brain-dead arguments on you.
Like I said, we'll see.
Maybe, I didn't notice it.
I already said.
Scandinavia had a failed swine flu vaccine that gave kids insomnia. They were more on edge about these vaccines because of it.
Most likely, yes. It's more likely than all the Bill Gates related theories.
No, it was probably just a regular vaccine with side effects.
Will you admit that you were wrong about wahmen being all-powerful if you are wrong, or will you - yet again, as always - come up with some BS excuse for your self-sealing hypothesis?
No, you didn't explain why THEEEEY allowed it to be banned. Unless you want to say that the fact that some women died, which is the case .
Not real brainiacs to put all their hopes of The Genocide into a product that will necessarily kill women as well and which for that reason will have to be pulled, eh?
So the most 'female supremacist' countries were the first to ban the vaccine over men dying? And the first to ban was a country with a female PM by a Traitor Health Minister who served under a wahmen?
How does that make sense? The planners for The Genocide had not counted on the dreaded vaccines which gave kids insomnia? Poor planning.
My retarded theory is less retarded than that retarded theory!
So you, being the genius that you are, think that some wahmen developed a vaccine against a virus that kills mostly men, but as it saves the lives of those countless men, made it so that it would result in a tiny number of deaths? If she were a smart planner for The Genocide, she would just not have developed the vaccine.
You will literally believe anything.
I'm sure some man was spotted in the vicinty with the vaccine was created. That would prove that it's a vaccine developed by men to kill women.
Not exactly. I'd just admit that some traits can nullify female privilege.
Yes, it was banned because it killed young women. That's exactly why. They had the families of male victims propagandise on YouTube about how safe it was before that. Zero shame.
I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on Scandinavian culture. I'm just saying that they have a history of blocking things after very few people suffer side effects.
A 20-40 year old is a far bigger threat to matriarchal tyranny than a 70+ year old. Surely I don't need to explain further than that.
No it wouldn't, because we aren't constantly caught fantasizing about killing them. The same is not true for them killing us.
So you're already coming up with some BS excuses.
What a dishonest wreck. When Denmark with its female PM banned it, you said that other countries didn't care because it only killed men. So which is it?
No, you're only an expert on divining where the virus came from and why. Surprise, surprise, it was to kill you, as everything seems to be. Such a shock that you are still alive, with 51% of the human population trying to kill you.
70+ is more likely to be conservative, and more likely to vote. If it were the other way around, you would be claiming that THEEEEEEY are sparing 20-40 year old men because they are more likely to be in league with THEEEEEM.
Not to mention that you also claimed that you reconsidered, because you realized that THEEEEEEY would know that THEEEEIR killer vaccine would only kill those who trusted THEEEEEEEEM.
I'm pretty sure you do, and you hide it.
That's the argument you use, right? From now on, I'm going to use your own brain-dead arguments on you.