This goes a bit further than 'not expecting' it. You were categorically asserting that it would not happen, that it could not happen. You were challenging me to a bet, which is a curious reversal of roles, and being so sure that you said you would admit you were wrong - which you in retrospect really did not wanted to do.
Now, everything that happened is what was to be expected, except for your refusal to admit that you were very wrong.
I pulled back from that bet because I realized...women do get charged.
You didn't "pull back" at all. You do realize that you can't pull out of a bet when you realize you've lost.
They just usually win against the charges.
Do they now?
Why on earth would we give them a stronger claim to be victims?
Cause they are weak as hell.
Where did you get those figures? Italy reported 4 to every one woman in the first wave.
I don't count the following waves as they weren't just allowed to burn through the population and also were affected by new variants of the disease.
Right, you only count Italy and only the first wave, because these wahmen who created the virus to 'kill men' were only interested in how many were killed in Italy, and only during the first wave. Apparently, Mario in high school dumped them, so they really wanted to kill 70+ Italian men.
60%? So I suppose Moderna and Pfizer don't exist?
I'll remind you of what a wise man said, that people who were told they were given Moderna and Pfizer would just be given the AZ vaccine, in order to kill them.
That wise man happened to be you.
You'll make any claim that is to your benefit at that particular moment.
They probably just throw AZ deaths on the Covid total. Every country is banning it now, can we please stop pretending it's safe?
There's no such thing as safe vaccine.
If THEEEEEEEEEEEEY are all-powerful and control governments, and THEEEEEEY created this vaccine to kill men, why are governments banning this vaccine? Aren't they sabotaging their own plan?
Is Google still going to buy up AZ as a reward for killing men, as you asserted, if these insubordinate governments prevent it by banning it?
We'll see if I was wrong overall. She won't see the inside of a cell.
Italy is just the statistic I remember. Feel free to give others from that time period.
Fair point, although that was less of a prediction and more of a wild stab at trying to work out what the reason was that they allowed it to be banned. But I've had a while now and the answer is obvious.
It was allowed to kill, up until it started to kill women. That was a malfunction and all the governments banned it at once to ensure that it didn't happen again. Notice J&J didn't have anywhere near that level of hesitation, because the first death was a woman.
We'll see if I was wrong overall. She won't see the inside of a cell.
You were already wrong overall. Two of your claims were proven false, two are now pending - that the charges will be 'quietly dropped', and that she will never go to jail.
Italy is just the statistic I remember. Feel free to give others from that time period.
I am pretty sure you saw a link.
Fair point, although that was less of a prediction and more of a wild stab at trying to work out what the reason was that they allowed it to be banned. But I've had a while now and the answer is obvious.
Do tell me. What is the 'obvious' answer?
It was allowed to kill, up until it started to kill women.
You had been posting links to governments, including Denmark, banning it long before it 'started to kill women'.
That was a malfunction
So the correct function, you claim, would have been the vaccine killing only men? Is there even such a thing?
Notice J&J didn't have anywhere near that level of hesitation, because the first death was a woman.
Clearly, J&J was a vaccine developed by men to kill women.
Will you admit that you were wrong about wahmen being all-powerful if you are wrong, or will you - yet again, as always - come up with some BS excuse for your self-sealing hypothesis?
I already said.
No, you didn't explain why THEEEEY allowed it to be banned. Unless you want to say that the fact that some women died, which is the case .
Not real brainiacs to put all their hopes of The Genocide into a product that will necessarily kill women as well and which for that reason will have to be pulled, eh?
Scandinavia had a failed swine flu vaccine that gave kids insomnia. They were more on edge about these vaccines because of it.
So the most 'female supremacist' countries were the first to ban the vaccine over men dying? And the first to ban was a country with a female PM by a Traitor Health Minister who served under a wahmen?
How does that make sense? The planners for The Genocide had not counted on the dreaded vaccines which gave kids insomnia? Poor planning.
Most likely, yes. It's more likely than all the Bill Gates related theories.
My retarded theory is less retarded than that retarded theory!
So you, being the genius that you are, think that some wahmen developed a vaccine against a virus that kills mostly men, but as it saves the lives of those countless men, made it so that it would result in a tiny number of deaths? If she were a smart planner for The Genocide, she would just not have developed the vaccine.
You will literally believe anything.
No, it was probably just a regular vaccine with side effects.
I'm sure some man was spotted in the vicinty with the vaccine was created. That would prove that it's a vaccine developed by men to kill women.
This goes a bit further than 'not expecting' it. You were categorically asserting that it would not happen, that it could not happen. You were challenging me to a bet, which is a curious reversal of roles, and being so sure that you said you would admit you were wrong - which you in retrospect really did not wanted to do.
Now, everything that happened is what was to be expected, except for your refusal to admit that you were very wrong.
You didn't "pull back" at all. You do realize that you can't pull out of a bet when you realize you've lost.
Do they now?
Cause they are weak as hell.
https://globalhealth5050.org/the-sex-gender-and-covid-19-project/the-data-tracker/?explore=country&country=USA#search
Just an example.
Right, you only count Italy and only the first wave, because these wahmen who created the virus to 'kill men' were only interested in how many were killed in Italy, and only during the first wave. Apparently, Mario in high school dumped them, so they really wanted to kill 70+ Italian men.
I'll remind you of what a wise man said, that people who were told they were given Moderna and Pfizer would just be given the AZ vaccine, in order to kill them.
That wise man happened to be you.
You'll make any claim that is to your benefit at that particular moment.
Is Google still going to buy up AZ as a reward for killing men, as you asserted, if these insubordinate governments prevent it by banning it?
We'll see if I was wrong overall. She won't see the inside of a cell.
Italy is just the statistic I remember. Feel free to give others from that time period.
Fair point, although that was less of a prediction and more of a wild stab at trying to work out what the reason was that they allowed it to be banned. But I've had a while now and the answer is obvious.
It was allowed to kill, up until it started to kill women. That was a malfunction and all the governments banned it at once to ensure that it didn't happen again. Notice J&J didn't have anywhere near that level of hesitation, because the first death was a woman.
You were already wrong overall. Two of your claims were proven false, two are now pending - that the charges will be 'quietly dropped', and that she will never go to jail.
I am pretty sure you saw a link.
Do tell me. What is the 'obvious' answer?
You had been posting links to governments, including Denmark, banning it long before it 'started to kill women'.
So the correct function, you claim, would have been the vaccine killing only men? Is there even such a thing?
Clearly, J&J was a vaccine developed by men to kill women.
Like I said, we'll see.
Maybe, I didn't notice it.
I already said.
Scandinavia had a failed swine flu vaccine that gave kids insomnia. They were more on edge about these vaccines because of it.
Most likely, yes. It's more likely than all the Bill Gates related theories.
No, it was probably just a regular vaccine with side effects.
Will you admit that you were wrong about wahmen being all-powerful if you are wrong, or will you - yet again, as always - come up with some BS excuse for your self-sealing hypothesis?
No, you didn't explain why THEEEEY allowed it to be banned. Unless you want to say that the fact that some women died, which is the case .
Not real brainiacs to put all their hopes of The Genocide into a product that will necessarily kill women as well and which for that reason will have to be pulled, eh?
So the most 'female supremacist' countries were the first to ban the vaccine over men dying? And the first to ban was a country with a female PM by a Traitor Health Minister who served under a wahmen?
How does that make sense? The planners for The Genocide had not counted on the dreaded vaccines which gave kids insomnia? Poor planning.
My retarded theory is less retarded than that retarded theory!
So you, being the genius that you are, think that some wahmen developed a vaccine against a virus that kills mostly men, but as it saves the lives of those countless men, made it so that it would result in a tiny number of deaths? If she were a smart planner for The Genocide, she would just not have developed the vaccine.
You will literally believe anything.
I'm sure some man was spotted in the vicinty with the vaccine was created. That would prove that it's a vaccine developed by men to kill women.