How is that going? I'm looking at the headlines now, nobody's talking about her anymore. Exactly as predicted.
ROFL. Yes, her being named, her photograph posted, and then charged is "exactly" what you predicted. The exact opposite, mind you.
Note that you claimed that you would admit that you were wrong, if events turned out differently, and then were too much of a coward to do so.
Now you are claiming that when things quiet down, the charges will be quietly dropped. Well... it won't have any effect on your prediction accuracy. You're already at 0%.
much less the reckoning on arming women that it should have brought.
You believe women should not have Second Amendment rights?
You're sick in the head beyond belief.
Well, the alleged reason was CP
So you were lying yet again. And you knew it. Good to know.
I'm not even going to dignify that with a response.
You're appalling perpetual victim act and your "WAHMEN ARE TRYING TO KILL ME" is supposed to be dignified?
Well, who is the director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology again?
"I SPOTTED A WAHMEN! CLEARLY A CONSPIRACY TO KILL ME!"
You make feminists look sane.
I suppose you think all the lunatic articles about reinstating the AZ vaccine, including one shared by Cairns herself, are just for fun.
No, the reasonable explanation was obviously that it was a plot to kill you.
Has anybody seen Professor Sarah Gilbert?
Trying and failing to knock down your door and kill you, probably.
I underestimated the desperation of the media to have something to use against cops. I'll admit I'm wrong if she ever sees the inside of a cell, which she won't.
Considering their unhinged beliefs, would you trust them with a weapon? In an ideal world, they wouldn't be allowed weapons, but I wouldn't be willing to trade men's ability to have them for that.
Completely ignore the rest of what I said then? Alright. Not exactly a decent argument, I wasted my time writing all that.
The disease is four times more likely to kill a male.
Not me specifically.
She hasn't been seen anywhere since people started dying.
I underestimated the desperation of the media to have something to use against cops. I'll admit I'm wrong if she ever sees the inside of a cell, which she won't.
You already vowed to admit that you were wrong if she was charged, and you failed to do that. Why should any of your promised admissions be trusted now?
I might take you slightly more seriously if you promised to admit that your "WAAAHMEN are all-powerful" nonsense is BS if she is convicted.
Considering [women's] unhinged beliefs, would you trust [women] with a weapon?
Yes. They would be able to defend themselves from crazed misogynists like you.
In an ideal world, they wouldn't be allowed weapons
Let's make sure that the weaker sex doesn't have weapons and the stronger sex does. You want to make it even easier for rapists?
Completely ignore the rest of what I said then? Alright. Not exactly a decent argument, I wasted my time writing all that.
I was unaware that "a wahmen was spotted at Mastercard" was supposed to be an argument. Besides, you've made it before, and you failed to make any connection between said feminist shrew and the decision in question. You're just assuming it.
The disease is four times more likely to kill a male.
THAT is your proof that 'wahmen created the virus to kill men'? I suppose every disease more likely to kill women was created by you to kill women.
Also, you're lying yet again, because even in the worst case it's 2-1.
You really are a feminist.
She hasn't been seen anywhere since people started dying.
Note that you whine about me addressing not one of your loony tune non-arguments, but you didn't address why this 'vaccine created to kill men' has now been used on 60% of British people, and this 'Genocide' you keep complaining about didn't arrive. Is it coming at any moment?
Nor how you lost your $10 bet that women would be exempted. But being wrong is your usual state.
Well, I didn't expect the charge, but I pulled back from that bet because I realized...women do get charged. They just usually win against the charges. Even in the UK, they get charged with murder, and win the case by claiming abuse with zero evidence.
I consider physical violence against them both morally and tactically incorrect. Why on earth would we give them a stronger claim to be victims? If incel shootings didn't exist, their dumb fuck cult wouldn't be going after "misogyny" online because everyone would see it as the transparent attack on criticism of their world order that it is.
What's the report to conviction rate again? I'm more concerned about them lying about it to kill someone in "self-defence".
Where did you get those figures? Italy reported 4 to every one woman in the first wave. I don't count the following waves as they weren't just allowed to burn through the population and also were affected by new variants of the disease.
60%? So I suppose Moderna and Pfizer don't exist? They probably just throw AZ deaths on the Covid total. Every country is banning it now, can we please stop pretending it's safe?
This goes a bit further than 'not expecting' it. You were categorically asserting that it would not happen, that it could not happen. You were challenging me to a bet, which is a curious reversal of roles, and being so sure that you said you would admit you were wrong - which you in retrospect really did not wanted to do.
Now, everything that happened is what was to be expected, except for your refusal to admit that you were very wrong.
I pulled back from that bet because I realized...women do get charged.
You didn't "pull back" at all. You do realize that you can't pull out of a bet when you realize you've lost.
They just usually win against the charges.
Do they now?
Why on earth would we give them a stronger claim to be victims?
Cause they are weak as hell.
Where did you get those figures? Italy reported 4 to every one woman in the first wave.
I don't count the following waves as they weren't just allowed to burn through the population and also were affected by new variants of the disease.
Right, you only count Italy and only the first wave, because these wahmen who created the virus to 'kill men' were only interested in how many were killed in Italy, and only during the first wave. Apparently, Mario in high school dumped them, so they really wanted to kill 70+ Italian men.
60%? So I suppose Moderna and Pfizer don't exist?
I'll remind you of what a wise man said, that people who were told they were given Moderna and Pfizer would just be given the AZ vaccine, in order to kill them.
That wise man happened to be you.
You'll make any claim that is to your benefit at that particular moment.
They probably just throw AZ deaths on the Covid total. Every country is banning it now, can we please stop pretending it's safe?
There's no such thing as safe vaccine.
If THEEEEEEEEEEEEY are all-powerful and control governments, and THEEEEEEY created this vaccine to kill men, why are governments banning this vaccine? Aren't they sabotaging their own plan?
Is Google still going to buy up AZ as a reward for killing men, as you asserted, if these insubordinate governments prevent it by banning it?
ROFL. Yes, her being named, her photograph posted, and then charged is "exactly" what you predicted. The exact opposite, mind you.
Note that you claimed that you would admit that you were wrong, if events turned out differently, and then were too much of a coward to do so.
Now you are claiming that when things quiet down, the charges will be quietly dropped. Well... it won't have any effect on your prediction accuracy. You're already at 0%.
You believe women should not have Second Amendment rights?
You're sick in the head beyond belief.
So you were lying yet again. And you knew it. Good to know.
You're appalling perpetual victim act and your "WAHMEN ARE TRYING TO KILL ME" is supposed to be dignified?
"I SPOTTED A WAHMEN! CLEARLY A CONSPIRACY TO KILL ME!"
You make feminists look sane.
No, the reasonable explanation was obviously that it was a plot to kill you.
Trying and failing to knock down your door and kill you, probably.
I underestimated the desperation of the media to have something to use against cops. I'll admit I'm wrong if she ever sees the inside of a cell, which she won't.
Considering their unhinged beliefs, would you trust them with a weapon? In an ideal world, they wouldn't be allowed weapons, but I wouldn't be willing to trade men's ability to have them for that.
Completely ignore the rest of what I said then? Alright. Not exactly a decent argument, I wasted my time writing all that.
The disease is four times more likely to kill a male.
Not me specifically.
She hasn't been seen anywhere since people started dying.
You already vowed to admit that you were wrong if she was charged, and you failed to do that. Why should any of your promised admissions be trusted now?
I might take you slightly more seriously if you promised to admit that your "WAAAHMEN are all-powerful" nonsense is BS if she is convicted.
Yes. They would be able to defend themselves from crazed misogynists like you.
Let's make sure that the weaker sex doesn't have weapons and the stronger sex does. You want to make it even easier for rapists?
I was unaware that "a wahmen was spotted at Mastercard" was supposed to be an argument. Besides, you've made it before, and you failed to make any connection between said feminist shrew and the decision in question. You're just assuming it.
THAT is your proof that 'wahmen created the virus to kill men'? I suppose every disease more likely to kill women was created by you to kill women.
Also, you're lying yet again, because even in the worst case it's 2-1.
You really are a feminist.
Note that you whine about me addressing not one of your loony tune non-arguments, but you didn't address why this 'vaccine created to kill men' has now been used on 60% of British people, and this 'Genocide' you keep complaining about didn't arrive. Is it coming at any moment?
Nor how you lost your $10 bet that women would be exempted. But being wrong is your usual state.
Well, I didn't expect the charge, but I pulled back from that bet because I realized...women do get charged. They just usually win against the charges. Even in the UK, they get charged with murder, and win the case by claiming abuse with zero evidence.
I consider physical violence against them both morally and tactically incorrect. Why on earth would we give them a stronger claim to be victims? If incel shootings didn't exist, their dumb fuck cult wouldn't be going after "misogyny" online because everyone would see it as the transparent attack on criticism of their world order that it is.
What's the report to conviction rate again? I'm more concerned about them lying about it to kill someone in "self-defence".
An openly feminist woman who has a membership of a political party that is so fringe, even the UK thinks it's too far.
Where did you get those figures? Italy reported 4 to every one woman in the first wave. I don't count the following waves as they weren't just allowed to burn through the population and also were affected by new variants of the disease.
60%? So I suppose Moderna and Pfizer don't exist? They probably just throw AZ deaths on the Covid total. Every country is banning it now, can we please stop pretending it's safe?
This goes a bit further than 'not expecting' it. You were categorically asserting that it would not happen, that it could not happen. You were challenging me to a bet, which is a curious reversal of roles, and being so sure that you said you would admit you were wrong - which you in retrospect really did not wanted to do.
Now, everything that happened is what was to be expected, except for your refusal to admit that you were very wrong.
You didn't "pull back" at all. You do realize that you can't pull out of a bet when you realize you've lost.
Do they now?
Cause they are weak as hell.
https://globalhealth5050.org/the-sex-gender-and-covid-19-project/the-data-tracker/?explore=country&country=USA#search
Just an example.
Right, you only count Italy and only the first wave, because these wahmen who created the virus to 'kill men' were only interested in how many were killed in Italy, and only during the first wave. Apparently, Mario in high school dumped them, so they really wanted to kill 70+ Italian men.
I'll remind you of what a wise man said, that people who were told they were given Moderna and Pfizer would just be given the AZ vaccine, in order to kill them.
That wise man happened to be you.
You'll make any claim that is to your benefit at that particular moment.
Is Google still going to buy up AZ as a reward for killing men, as you asserted, if these insubordinate governments prevent it by banning it?