The only way to attain equality is to inflict massive misery and pain upon all. You cannot uplift certain people, a retarded person (sorry, "person of retardedness") medically speaking will never have a 140 IQ. But you CAN lobotomize smart people to reduce theirs to 70.
Equality, intersectionalism, is the goal of torturing the most people, the worst ways possible. Because if one person has a broken wrist, EVERYONE must have a broken wrist, repeat for every injury imaginable.
For the political group that routinely berates and castigates those that promote following tradition, these Progressives sure do love to reference historical experience a lot.
Eh, it's just more doublethink along the "follow the science" vein. It's "This is a word I can use to win an argument, so I'll use it, even though I've trained myself to be entirely ignorant of what it means"
Actually one guy is, although they've also pre-judged the case, and they're rapidly shut down: "Black people throughout history would disagree"
So, because some demographics at some points in history have faced injustice, we must now inflict injustice upon all?
Is that the end point of intersectionalism? Actively making government as bad as it can be to ensure that all experience equal misery?
The only way to attain equality is to inflict massive misery and pain upon all. You cannot uplift certain people, a retarded person (sorry, "person of retardedness") medically speaking will never have a 140 IQ. But you CAN lobotomize smart people to reduce theirs to 70.
Equality, intersectionalism, is the goal of torturing the most people, the worst ways possible. Because if one person has a broken wrist, EVERYONE must have a broken wrist, repeat for every injury imaginable.
The communists figured it out! They were just ahead of their time.
For the political group that routinely berates and castigates those that promote following tradition, these Progressives sure do love to reference historical experience a lot.
Eh, it's just more doublethink along the "follow the science" vein. It's "This is a word I can use to win an argument, so I'll use it, even though I've trained myself to be entirely ignorant of what it means"