After an incident where anti-loli false flaggots got an account wrongfully banned for cp, ottman decided to ban loli by making false arguments similar to what 8chan owner jim watkins and gab owner andrew torba made.
Minds userbase is having none of it, and are actively calling ottman out for lying while demanding this decision be reversed.
new edit: ottman is having a meltdown, calling people bots and deleting posts.
edit: the mods need to consider banning the anti-loli spergs on this site for pointless infighting.
I like the argument you're building here, and crayet seems unable to participate. So how about me? I deny the notion that there exists a thing without reason.
Before I start, could I get a stricter guideline than "loli porn"? I will not ask you to provide an example for me to explain, as I assume you'd find that unpleasant (and potentially illegal, depending on your country). I could volunteer my own examples, but I'd potentially be wasting breath explaining a work that turns out to not fit the (currently unstated) criteria. We may as well disregard any image that holds no narrative context, because it would basically comes down to illustrative style or craftsmanship.
Even without more data, I can make some guesses based on my own experience with manga that isn't on porn sites. Broadly: metaphorical value, asthetic value, crude tonal display, and expression of incentive from another character's point of view. There's a lot of times where it's simply a bore or a symptom of a floundering artist.