The decision had not been scheduled ahead of time.
Two jurors were dismissed as a result, citing their belief that the city had signaled Chauvin's guilt with their payout. These jurors were both men. One of them was white.
Two more jurors acknowledged that they had learned of the payout, but both pinky-promised it would not impact their judgement in the case.
The latest seated jurors are a black man, a biracial woman, an unmarried white female nurse, and a retired elderly woman who volunteers to help underprivileged children.
I suspect the Minneapolis City Council deliberately timed this payout in order to influence the makeup of the jury.
Anyways, our judicial system is now much like our election system: operating on expectations of good faith and honesty between parties who view each other as existential threats.
Reminder that one of the OJ Simpson jurors is on record stating that their not-guilty verdict was payback for the decision in the Rodney King trial.
Seems like a pick your poison kind of deal. Either you're at the mercy of one person who's probably corrupt, cowed by threats or opposed to you, or 12 people who weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty.
This perception is a luxury we can't afford to have in Clown World. It's going to be very important that people opposed to this insanity sit on juries to provide some semblance of balance for those who support it and those who go along with it.
People opposed to this are only going to be marginally selectable in the jury pool. White men are a tiny part of what's allowed in these higher profile cases. A black, ignorant woman is the only uncontroversial choice. For every white guy, you'll get two Latishias. Maybe a single Karen with two mulatto kids.
Then don't be opposed to it when in the jury pool. Be fully in support and have a crisis of conscience once on the jury.