You assume they have any idea what they are doing. They don't. They're a societal anti-immune disease. An open society was a good thing, because the inevitable problems could be pointed to and solved. What then happens when these mechanisms are then turned on what makes the society great, like traditional values?
Not everything has to be collectively directed. Moral rot has consequences.
No, a Kristallnacht-type backlash. By which I mean how the German public responded to the outrages by the Nazis - the overwhelming majority was absolutely appalled.
You simply cannot keep half the population down like that, let alone half that has the physical strength.
Didn't the Nazis end up retaining power after that?
They were firmly entrenched, so yes, of course.
You can if you mentally break them first.
I don't think we're that far gone. If you have noticed, most of the virtue-signaling is either low-cost or at someone else's expense. No man has ever resigned to gave his good job to wahmen. Same for the white guilt types. Their nonsense is supposed to boost their social standing, not decrease it.
It's rationalizing and running apologetics for a state sponsored act of terrorism on an entire racial demographic. It also technically violates Rule 16 for a similar reason.
I am impressed that the British cop actually chased the violent animal who broke the mirrors of the police van.
British cops really need guns.
I can't think of anything that would cause mass outrage quicker than one of these freaks getting shot.
Probably true, unfortunately. The police have been completely hamstrung by lying media nonsense.
By design.
I just don't know what the end goal is. Usually I would say women benefit - but I can't see them winning in a world without the rule of law.
Only the strongest would prevail.
And they're not the strongest.
Nor are journalists. That part makes me happy.
So who would? And why are they pushing for a world where they don't win?
You assume they have any idea what they are doing. They don't. They're a societal anti-immune disease. An open society was a good thing, because the inevitable problems could be pointed to and solved. What then happens when these mechanisms are then turned on what makes the society great, like traditional values?
Not everything has to be collectively directed. Moral rot has consequences.
All this is about putting men in curfew every night for the rest of their lives.
If I were you, I'd hope that this passed.
Because nothing would lead to an anti-feminist backlash like that.
So, another Capitol break-in type backlash? That went well.
No, a Kristallnacht-type backlash. By which I mean how the German public responded to the outrages by the Nazis - the overwhelming majority was absolutely appalled.
You simply cannot keep half the population down like that, let alone half that has the physical strength.
Didn't the Nazis end up retaining power after that?
You can if you mentally break them first.
They were firmly entrenched, so yes, of course.
I don't think we're that far gone. If you have noticed, most of the virtue-signaling is either low-cost or at someone else's expense. No man has ever resigned to gave his good job to wahmen. Same for the white guilt types. Their nonsense is supposed to boost their social standing, not decrease it.
That's my point. The female supremacy movement is entrenched in every facet of society.
The UK is. Trust me.
Ah right, you think British men literally live under Nazism and that extermination camps are on the horizon.
Comment Removed: Rule 2
In what way does that break rule 2?
It's rationalizing and running apologetics for a state sponsored act of terrorism on an entire racial demographic. It also technically violates Rule 16 for a similar reason.