You assume they have any idea what they are doing. They don't. They're a societal anti-immune disease. An open society was a good thing, because the inevitable problems could be pointed to and solved. What then happens when these mechanisms are then turned on what makes the society great, like traditional values?
Not everything has to be collectively directed. Moral rot has consequences.
By design.
I just don't know what the end goal is. Usually I would say women benefit - but I can't see them winning in a world without the rule of law.
Only the strongest would prevail.
And they're not the strongest.
Nor are journalists. That part makes me happy.
So who would? And why are they pushing for a world where they don't win?
You assume they have any idea what they are doing. They don't. They're a societal anti-immune disease. An open society was a good thing, because the inevitable problems could be pointed to and solved. What then happens when these mechanisms are then turned on what makes the society great, like traditional values?
Not everything has to be collectively directed. Moral rot has consequences.