You're not using our platform to censor other people.
The obsession is bordering on the psychotic.
Not only is your... thirst for censorship immoral, it's also extraordinarily stupid. That you would aid a hegemonic ideology trying to censor its opponents. Frankly, you deserve whatever censorship you get. You have no principles.
Just going to leave this here. This is what happens when you get those kind of women an unmonitored space. They rape children and brag about the suffering they cause them.
Their head mod who created their website openly admitted there's no such thing as a non-toxic man. It's only time before that rhetoric dives into abuse, rape and murder.
My conscience is clear if I kick them off the internet. Can you say the same for defending them?
It is amazing that you link a SJW source here and expect to be believed. While you're at it, go to the article on Gamergate.
Their head mod who created their website openly admitted there's no such thing as a non-toxic man.
So your feewings were hurt?
My conscience is clear if I kick them off the internet
Your conscience? Considering that your 'conscience' approves of censorship and hating more than half the human population, I am not sure what it's supposed to guarantee.
Can you say the same for defending them?
Absolutely. They've been very useful so far in the fight against SJ, which is why they were banned. You, being the useful that you are, never cease doing the bidding of your intersectionalist female masters.
I don't speak Korean, you know. I can only say what I've read in English and it seems logical. It doesn't seem false in any way judging by what I know about these kinds of "communities." - I guess you'd have to look into the rape victim and tie the rapist to the site though. I could 1000% believe it though.
You can't see the issue of a community led by someone like that existing without any monitoring? Imagine if I made a community where the first rule was "Women cannot be anything other than the enemy." - You don't think some lunatic would go too far and kill someone?
Actually, I don't hate the children, unlike them.
Very useful how? Both sides want men killed, they're just arguing over what counts as a man.
I don't speak Korean, you know. I can only say what I've read in English and it seems logical.
You do not speak Korean, so you decided to believe the claims of Wikipedia, with a long list of SJW buzzwords and accusations?
It doesn't seem false in any way judging by what I know about these kinds of "communities."
"show extreme hatred towards transgender people"
WOMAD has been called "Korean-style TERFs"[
Actually, I don't hate the children, unlike them.
You only hate girls once they turn 18?
Imagine if I made a community where the first rule was "Women cannot be anything other than the enemy." - You don't think some lunatic would go too far and kill someone?
Wouldn't surprise me from you, to be honest. That could be because you make yourself look bad in the way you post your views, while when you are challenged, you then respond with something that is more nuanced and less crazy.
Very useful how? Both sides want men killed, they're just arguing over what counts as a man.
Even if that were true, you'd want there to be rancor and division among them.
Banning them doesn't protect anything other than your feewings. As I said, you're more of a feminist and a woman than anyone. Your entire nonsense is literally based on hurt feewings. And like feminists then scream at all men because some man called them bossy, you scream at women in general.
I don't care if they want us banned. They're weak, and they are useful. So don't do anything of the sort.
You're not using our platform to censor other people.
The obsession is bordering on the psychotic.
Not only is your... thirst for censorship immoral, it's also extraordinarily stupid. That you would aid a hegemonic ideology trying to censor its opponents. Frankly, you deserve whatever censorship you get. You have no principles.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WOMAD_(website)
Just going to leave this here. This is what happens when you get those kind of women an unmonitored space. They rape children and brag about the suffering they cause them.
Their head mod who created their website openly admitted there's no such thing as a non-toxic man. It's only time before that rhetoric dives into abuse, rape and murder.
My conscience is clear if I kick them off the internet. Can you say the same for defending them?
Based and redpilled
It is amazing that you link a SJW source here and expect to be believed. While you're at it, go to the article on Gamergate.
So your feewings were hurt?
Your conscience? Considering that your 'conscience' approves of censorship and hating more than half the human population, I am not sure what it's supposed to guarantee.
Absolutely. They've been very useful so far in the fight against SJ, which is why they were banned. You, being the useful that you are, never cease doing the bidding of your intersectionalist female masters.
I don't speak Korean, you know. I can only say what I've read in English and it seems logical. It doesn't seem false in any way judging by what I know about these kinds of "communities." - I guess you'd have to look into the rape victim and tie the rapist to the site though. I could 1000% believe it though.
You can't see the issue of a community led by someone like that existing without any monitoring? Imagine if I made a community where the first rule was "Women cannot be anything other than the enemy." - You don't think some lunatic would go too far and kill someone?
Actually, I don't hate the children, unlike them.
Very useful how? Both sides want men killed, they're just arguing over what counts as a man.
You do not speak Korean, so you decided to believe the claims of Wikipedia, with a long list of SJW buzzwords and accusations?
"show extreme hatred towards transgender people"
WOMAD has been called "Korean-style TERFs"[
You only hate girls once they turn 18?
Wouldn't surprise me from you, to be honest. That could be because you make yourself look bad in the way you post your views, while when you are challenged, you then respond with something that is more nuanced and less crazy.
Even if that were true, you'd want there to be rancor and division among them.
Why's that? Do you really believe they won't jump on us for "misogyny" or some other cultlike bullshit?
I'm not obsessed, I'm trying to protect people. They're evil, this thread proves it beyond any doubts.
Banning them doesn't protect anything other than your feewings. As I said, you're more of a feminist and a woman than anyone. Your entire nonsense is literally based on hurt feewings. And like feminists then scream at all men because some man called them bossy, you scream at women in general.
I don't care if they want us banned. They're weak, and they are useful. So don't do anything of the sort.
Refer to my other reply. It says my next point. For some reason, editing wouldn't work.