Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

62
()
posted 5 years ago by TheImpossible1 5 years ago by TheImpossible1 +62 / -0
83 comments share
83 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (83)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Just going to leave this here.

It is amazing that you link a SJW source here and expect to be believed. While you're at it, go to the article on Gamergate.

Their head mod who created their website openly admitted there's no such thing as a non-toxic man.

So your feewings were hurt?

My conscience is clear if I kick them off the internet

Your conscience? Considering that your 'conscience' approves of censorship and hating more than half the human population, I am not sure what it's supposed to guarantee.

Can you say the same for defending them?

Absolutely. They've been very useful so far in the fight against SJ, which is why they were banned. You, being the useful that you are, never cease doing the bidding of your intersectionalist female masters.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I don't speak Korean, you know. I can only say what I've read in English and it seems logical.

You do not speak Korean, so you decided to believe the claims of Wikipedia, with a long list of SJW buzzwords and accusations?

It doesn't seem false in any way judging by what I know about these kinds of "communities."

"show extreme hatred towards transgender people"

WOMAD has been called "Korean-style TERFs"[

Actually, I don't hate the children, unlike them.

You only hate girls once they turn 18?

Imagine if I made a community where the first rule was "Women cannot be anything other than the enemy." - You don't think some lunatic would go too far and kill someone?

Wouldn't surprise me from you, to be honest. That could be because you make yourself look bad in the way you post your views, while when you are challenged, you then respond with something that is more nuanced and less crazy.

Very useful how? Both sides want men killed, they're just arguing over what counts as a man.

Even if that were true, you'd want there to be rancor and division among them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I'd probably end up writing something like that but with less woke buzzwords.

See what I mean? And if you go to the Wikipedia page for Gamergate, you can read about how we are all wahmen-hating wight supremacists.

Are they not TERFs?

Nah, I don't think that opposing the political agenda of degenerates is 'exclusionary' of anyone, least of all 'transgenders'. There is no such category to begin with.

...have you seen the way they vote at 18?

One part votes for one party, and the other part votes for the other party, while still another part does not vote at all? So you hate them as a group?

I'm just very untrusting and take people at their word without benefit of the doubt

That is smart. I don't trust people either.

Making that dependent on gender is monumentally stupid though.

That is why I trust that nice lady you hate more than I trust you. She's been around for far longer, has shown herself to be trustworthy, and even defended you to me, while you spun bizarre tales about her and acted your usual.

  • when most of their "jokes" are about killing people, it's difficult to think they don't mean it deep down.

Who the hell cares? They're 5'1". And if you are afraid of wahmen killing you, and hate them for that reason, then you admit that wahmen are justified in hating all men - as more men kill women than vice versa.

But is that diversion worth the cost from their questionable actions?

Hurting your feelings? Yes.

Is it worth emboldening those who talk about things that would equal a war crimes conviction backed by all UN members if it was any other group?

You need to decide whether you're going to be a woman, and complain just for the sake of complaining, or if you're going to act like a man, and join me in finding a solution.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy