It is amazing that you link a SJW source here and expect to be believed. While you're at it, go to the article on Gamergate.
Their head mod who created their website openly admitted there's no such thing as a non-toxic man.
So your feewings were hurt?
My conscience is clear if I kick them off the internet
Your conscience? Considering that your 'conscience' approves of censorship and hating more than half the human population, I am not sure what it's supposed to guarantee.
Can you say the same for defending them?
Absolutely. They've been very useful so far in the fight against SJ, which is why they were banned. You, being the useful that you are, never cease doing the bidding of your intersectionalist female masters.
I don't speak Korean, you know. I can only say what I've read in English and it seems logical. It doesn't seem false in any way judging by what I know about these kinds of "communities." - I guess you'd have to look into the rape victim and tie the rapist to the site though. I could 1000% believe it though.
You can't see the issue of a community led by someone like that existing without any monitoring? Imagine if I made a community where the first rule was "Women cannot be anything other than the enemy." - You don't think some lunatic would go too far and kill someone?
Actually, I don't hate the children, unlike them.
Very useful how? Both sides want men killed, they're just arguing over what counts as a man.
I don't speak Korean, you know. I can only say what I've read in English and it seems logical.
You do not speak Korean, so you decided to believe the claims of Wikipedia, with a long list of SJW buzzwords and accusations?
It doesn't seem false in any way judging by what I know about these kinds of "communities."
"show extreme hatred towards transgender people"
WOMAD has been called "Korean-style TERFs"[
Actually, I don't hate the children, unlike them.
You only hate girls once they turn 18?
Imagine if I made a community where the first rule was "Women cannot be anything other than the enemy." - You don't think some lunatic would go too far and kill someone?
Wouldn't surprise me from you, to be honest. That could be because you make yourself look bad in the way you post your views, while when you are challenged, you then respond with something that is more nuanced and less crazy.
Very useful how? Both sides want men killed, they're just arguing over what counts as a man.
Even if that were true, you'd want there to be rancor and division among them.
I mean, they act like GC. That description sounds like GC. If I was to write about GC, I'd probably end up writing something like that but with less woke buzzwords.
Are they not TERFs? They sure act like them. It's not a woke attack when they literally are TERFs.
...have you seen the way they vote at 18?
I'm not that crazy. I'm just very untrusting and take people at their word without benefit of the doubt - when most of their "jokes" are about killing people, it's difficult to think they don't mean it deep down. Especially considering their actions and the consequences of most of them, and the fact that they literally fight to get female murderers off the hook across the world.
But is that diversion worth the cost from their questionable actions? Is it worth emboldening those who talk about things that would equal a war crimes conviction backed by all UN members if it was any other group?
I'd probably end up writing something like that but with less woke buzzwords.
See what I mean? And if you go to the Wikipedia page for Gamergate, you can read about how we are all wahmen-hating wight supremacists.
Are they not TERFs?
Nah, I don't think that opposing the political agenda of degenerates is 'exclusionary' of anyone, least of all 'transgenders'. There is no such category to begin with.
...have you seen the way they vote at 18?
One part votes for one party, and the other part votes for the other party, while still another part does not vote at all? So you hate them as a group?
I'm just very untrusting and take people at their word without benefit of the doubt
That is smart. I don't trust people either.
Making that dependent on gender is monumentally stupid though.
That is why I trust that nice lady you hate more than I trust you. She's been around for far longer, has shown herself to be trustworthy, and even defended you to me, while you spun bizarre tales about her and acted your usual.
when most of their "jokes" are about killing people, it's difficult to think they don't mean it deep down.
Who the hell cares? They're 5'1". And if you are afraid of wahmen killing you, and hate them for that reason, then you admit that wahmen are justified in hating all men - as more men kill women than vice versa.
But is that diversion worth the cost from their questionable actions?
Hurting your feelings? Yes.
Is it worth emboldening those who talk about things that would equal a war crimes conviction backed by all UN members if it was any other group?
You need to decide whether you're going to be a woman, and complain just for the sake of complaining, or if you're going to act like a man, and join me in finding a solution.
It is amazing that you link a SJW source here and expect to be believed. While you're at it, go to the article on Gamergate.
So your feewings were hurt?
Your conscience? Considering that your 'conscience' approves of censorship and hating more than half the human population, I am not sure what it's supposed to guarantee.
Absolutely. They've been very useful so far in the fight against SJ, which is why they were banned. You, being the useful that you are, never cease doing the bidding of your intersectionalist female masters.
I don't speak Korean, you know. I can only say what I've read in English and it seems logical. It doesn't seem false in any way judging by what I know about these kinds of "communities." - I guess you'd have to look into the rape victim and tie the rapist to the site though. I could 1000% believe it though.
You can't see the issue of a community led by someone like that existing without any monitoring? Imagine if I made a community where the first rule was "Women cannot be anything other than the enemy." - You don't think some lunatic would go too far and kill someone?
Actually, I don't hate the children, unlike them.
Very useful how? Both sides want men killed, they're just arguing over what counts as a man.
You do not speak Korean, so you decided to believe the claims of Wikipedia, with a long list of SJW buzzwords and accusations?
"show extreme hatred towards transgender people"
WOMAD has been called "Korean-style TERFs"[
You only hate girls once they turn 18?
Wouldn't surprise me from you, to be honest. That could be because you make yourself look bad in the way you post your views, while when you are challenged, you then respond with something that is more nuanced and less crazy.
Even if that were true, you'd want there to be rancor and division among them.
I mean, they act like GC. That description sounds like GC. If I was to write about GC, I'd probably end up writing something like that but with less woke buzzwords.
Are they not TERFs? They sure act like them. It's not a woke attack when they literally are TERFs.
...have you seen the way they vote at 18?
I'm not that crazy. I'm just very untrusting and take people at their word without benefit of the doubt - when most of their "jokes" are about killing people, it's difficult to think they don't mean it deep down. Especially considering their actions and the consequences of most of them, and the fact that they literally fight to get female murderers off the hook across the world.
But is that diversion worth the cost from their questionable actions? Is it worth emboldening those who talk about things that would equal a war crimes conviction backed by all UN members if it was any other group?
See what I mean? And if you go to the Wikipedia page for Gamergate, you can read about how we are all wahmen-hating wight supremacists.
Nah, I don't think that opposing the political agenda of degenerates is 'exclusionary' of anyone, least of all 'transgenders'. There is no such category to begin with.
One part votes for one party, and the other part votes for the other party, while still another part does not vote at all? So you hate them as a group?
That is smart. I don't trust people either.
Making that dependent on gender is monumentally stupid though.
That is why I trust that nice lady you hate more than I trust you. She's been around for far longer, has shown herself to be trustworthy, and even defended you to me, while you spun bizarre tales about her and acted your usual.
Who the hell cares? They're 5'1". And if you are afraid of wahmen killing you, and hate them for that reason, then you admit that wahmen are justified in hating all men - as more men kill women than vice versa.
Hurting your feelings? Yes.
You need to decide whether you're going to be a woman, and complain just for the sake of complaining, or if you're going to act like a man, and join me in finding a solution.