I don't speak Korean, you know. I can only say what I've read in English and it seems logical.
You do not speak Korean, so you decided to believe the claims of Wikipedia, with a long list of SJW buzzwords and accusations?
It doesn't seem false in any way judging by what I know about these kinds of "communities."
"show extreme hatred towards transgender people"
WOMAD has been called "Korean-style TERFs"[
Actually, I don't hate the children, unlike them.
You only hate girls once they turn 18?
Imagine if I made a community where the first rule was "Women cannot be anything other than the enemy." - You don't think some lunatic would go too far and kill someone?
Wouldn't surprise me from you, to be honest. That could be because you make yourself look bad in the way you post your views, while when you are challenged, you then respond with something that is more nuanced and less crazy.
Very useful how? Both sides want men killed, they're just arguing over what counts as a man.
Even if that were true, you'd want there to be rancor and division among them.
I'd probably end up writing something like that but with less woke buzzwords.
See what I mean? And if you go to the Wikipedia page for Gamergate, you can read about how we are all wahmen-hating wight supremacists.
Are they not TERFs?
Nah, I don't think that opposing the political agenda of degenerates is 'exclusionary' of anyone, least of all 'transgenders'. There is no such category to begin with.
...have you seen the way they vote at 18?
One part votes for one party, and the other part votes for the other party, while still another part does not vote at all? So you hate them as a group?
I'm just very untrusting and take people at their word without benefit of the doubt
That is smart. I don't trust people either.
Making that dependent on gender is monumentally stupid though.
That is why I trust that nice lady you hate more than I trust you. She's been around for far longer, has shown herself to be trustworthy, and even defended you to me, while you spun bizarre tales about her and acted your usual.
when most of their "jokes" are about killing people, it's difficult to think they don't mean it deep down.
Who the hell cares? They're 5'1". And if you are afraid of wahmen killing you, and hate them for that reason, then you admit that wahmen are justified in hating all men - as more men kill women than vice versa.
But is that diversion worth the cost from their questionable actions?
Hurting your feelings? Yes.
Is it worth emboldening those who talk about things that would equal a war crimes conviction backed by all UN members if it was any other group?
You need to decide whether you're going to be a woman, and complain just for the sake of complaining, or if you're going to act like a man, and join me in finding a solution.
My concern is more with the "Lorena Bobbit/Donna Hylton/Valerie Solanas did nothing wrong" crowd that comes with the RF. The TE isn't that relevant to me, but it comes as part of the description so I call them TERFs like everyone else.
They're marginal at best. They're mostly interested in segregating themselves from men, which solves the problem. Whereas the intersectionalists date men while also hating on them.
I'm not rule 16ing myself. What's their voter stats again? 80% left-wing?
Let's say it is 80% left-wing. So then you also hate the 20% who stand up against that amount of peer pressure and don't vote for the left-wing?
I am pretty sure you're not Rule 16'ing yourself here. Remember that you barely managed to get yourself banned even on Reddit.
Yeah, but you seem to think that GC are somehow fellow human beings, rather than pure evil wearing human skin.
Some of them definitely are, as there are also many anti-tranny conservatives who like GC because it stands against trannydom. As for fellow human beings, I don't care about anyone's status as human being. I care about the extent to which they are useful to us.
Assuming they are the worst of what you say, if Valerie Solanas worshipers can be turned against intersectionalists, so much the better.
Guns, poison, selective abortion etc don't care about your physical strength.
And I'm pretty sure I still stand a much lower chance of being killed by a wahmen than they do being killed by a man.
I was thinking more the cost if their "I aborted my male baby" stories were real and not just some kind of weird hate fetish as I presume you consider them to be.
Undoubtedly there are some psychos who do that. They're a marginal phenomenon. Even feminists have a hard time fighting against biology, and biology dictates that a woman will love her child. The exceptions are far and few.
Gender-selective abortion is considered a crime against humanity, that shouldn't change when women do it.
It's always women doing it, even when it's girls being aborted. That is because having a girl is less useful in places like China and India.
You do not speak Korean, so you decided to believe the claims of Wikipedia, with a long list of SJW buzzwords and accusations?
"show extreme hatred towards transgender people"
WOMAD has been called "Korean-style TERFs"[
You only hate girls once they turn 18?
Wouldn't surprise me from you, to be honest. That could be because you make yourself look bad in the way you post your views, while when you are challenged, you then respond with something that is more nuanced and less crazy.
Even if that were true, you'd want there to be rancor and division among them.
See what I mean? And if you go to the Wikipedia page for Gamergate, you can read about how we are all wahmen-hating wight supremacists.
Nah, I don't think that opposing the political agenda of degenerates is 'exclusionary' of anyone, least of all 'transgenders'. There is no such category to begin with.
One part votes for one party, and the other part votes for the other party, while still another part does not vote at all? So you hate them as a group?
That is smart. I don't trust people either.
Making that dependent on gender is monumentally stupid though.
That is why I trust that nice lady you hate more than I trust you. She's been around for far longer, has shown herself to be trustworthy, and even defended you to me, while you spun bizarre tales about her and acted your usual.
Who the hell cares? They're 5'1". And if you are afraid of wahmen killing you, and hate them for that reason, then you admit that wahmen are justified in hating all men - as more men kill women than vice versa.
Hurting your feelings? Yes.
You need to decide whether you're going to be a woman, and complain just for the sake of complaining, or if you're going to act like a man, and join me in finding a solution.
They're marginal at best. They're mostly interested in segregating themselves from men, which solves the problem. Whereas the intersectionalists date men while also hating on them.
Let's say it is 80% left-wing. So then you also hate the 20% who stand up against that amount of peer pressure and don't vote for the left-wing?
I am pretty sure you're not Rule 16'ing yourself here. Remember that you barely managed to get yourself banned even on Reddit.
Some of them definitely are, as there are also many anti-tranny conservatives who like GC because it stands against trannydom. As for fellow human beings, I don't care about anyone's status as human being. I care about the extent to which they are useful to us.
Assuming they are the worst of what you say, if Valerie Solanas worshipers can be turned against intersectionalists, so much the better.
And I'm pretty sure I still stand a much lower chance of being killed by a wahmen than they do being killed by a man.
Undoubtedly there are some psychos who do that. They're a marginal phenomenon. Even feminists have a hard time fighting against biology, and biology dictates that a woman will love her child. The exceptions are far and few.
It's always women doing it, even when it's girls being aborted. That is because having a girl is less useful in places like China and India.