Prequel KIA showing what really matters
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
People are turning to fapping their dicks off because the amount of "normal, traditional" women are minimal. And if you find one, you run the risk of her changing her mind (because there is zero consequence to her doing so) and just becoming that divorce raping, child stealing woman like the rest.
So if you have a solution to just fix the vast majority of women (remember, its not a traditional family if she isn't a virgin!) start laying it out. That's the first step, trying to attack men into risking everything before you do so is just playing fast and loose with their lives and skipping ahead steps.
If Jews run both Mastercard and the porn industry, why did they use the former to attack the latter?
Or are Mastercard our friends now?
Hang on, but if government = corporate = activists, they wouldn't be worried about that, because they own the government.
Why would the government they control attack their own projects? You can't have it both ways, you can't have both sides of a war controlled by the same people.
Are you familiar with Mastercard's Vice President, a member of the Women's Equality Party? (a fringe radical party in the UK focused on female supremacy...yes, even more than Labour and the Conservatives.)
This is absolutely a feminist act to push OnlyFans because it benefits their hugely inflated value and fuels their hideous egos.
Edit : Oh, former chair of AstraZeneca too. All the feminist cult projects seem to link up eventually.
I'm not disagreeing with you on ideas, but you keep just throwing out utopian perfect end points without any logical A to B in between. "Its not easy" addresses not a single part of "well how do you fix them." Nor does banning porn stop the oldest profession from cropping its head up one way or another.
You are trying to pass Prohibition again by saying "if we ban alcohol people will just magically stop doing crime and beating wives" but with porn.Which we have historical proof just makes the problem worse.
Women selling their bodies is the root of all those. That's the world's oldest profession. The selling of the product (their body) in one manner or another. Before we had concepts of currency or art (prostitution and porn respectively) they still sold it for protection, even companionship. Don't be an SJW and get caught up in specific words that only mean the strict definition that benefits your world view. Women will find ways to sell themselves, and men will feel compelled buy it no matter how hard you try to squash it.
That's you letting your own bias read words that aren't being said. Most people's criticism of Gab wasn't banning porn because they were horny. It was Gab prostrating itself as "free speech!" and then after "except stuff we don't like."
Which is exactly how all censorship movements start. If Gab just said "no NSFW stuff, professional/ad reasons" I doubt they would have gotten 90% of the pushback, but instead it was "PORN IS DEGENERATE AND EVIL AND WE REFUSE IT!"
If you have to make exceptions on your principles to justify your personal feelings, then you have no principles and people are right to be suspicious that you may compromise them further in the future.
As I said elsewhere in this thread, Gab is still likely the best case solution and we shouldn't sink it over this, but being aware of it and rightfully being suspicious of further compromise is necessary.