Revoking 230 leaves it Down To corps to do whatever they please, amendment leaves it open to lobbying... Where corps will win. What needs to happen really, is it needs clarifying, without lobbying and enforcing. They've seen clear cut cases of twitter, Facebook et Al acting as publishers and they choose to ignore enforcing 230. Enforcement is needed.
Coming from him, those words mean less than nothing.
Well yes I very much hope so, putting consequences on the table is the entire point of why 230 must be altered or revoked.
Revoking 230 leaves it Down To corps to do whatever they please, amendment leaves it open to lobbying... Where corps will win. What needs to happen really, is it needs clarifying, without lobbying and enforcing. They've seen clear cut cases of twitter, Facebook et Al acting as publishers and they choose to ignore enforcing 230. Enforcement is needed.
This will never happen though. There's is no realistic scenario where the chips are played fair.
There will be consequences? That’s big talk from a guy that constantly has to beg people for money to keep his website open.
All the millions Jimbo raises goes into his wallet, so yes.
For certain definitions of “speech,” I’m sure it is. Definitions by which mass censorship of political opponents is speech, that is.
What's he going to do? Write biased articles of Trump on Wikipedia?
didnt he also say that wikipedia is compromised due to massive leftist lean?