Recently got a temp ban from KiA2 for very mildly acknowledging this fact. Just testing the waters here.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (142)
sorted by:
That's an ironic description, given that the people who point out everyone who's Jewish are usually heavily tradcucked and think women will all love us and be nice to us once "the enemy" is out of power.
I think women and men were both generally happier under the nurturer/provider paradigm. The real damage to family/society didn't occur until second wave feminism. Third wave feminism went from destructive to actively hostile. The thought leaders of these most destructive waves were Jewish (as are most critical theory ideologies that permeate modern academia).
People always flourish best when their actions conform to their nature. But some folks will call you a 'tradcuck' for... advocating what was practiced for 250,000 years of human history before 40 years ago.
Even if true, so what? I know it might seem obvious to some that "therefore, we should hate the Jews", but if you hated and vilifying people for what people of their ethnic group did, who'd be spared a whipping?
Usually because such a stance lacks the balls to acknowledge what is necessary to restore those traditions, namely taking women's rights away.
These 'rights' should be taken insofar as they are not actual rights, but invented ones. But by acknowledging them as rights, you assert that by taking them away you are doing something wrong.
No, I fully acknowledge that people would consider that necessary, but I have a counter point.
If you have to take everything from them and basically put them in chains to make them treat others like human beings - why on earth would you bother?
Just stop them fucking up society and leave them to their own devices other than that, writing their genocidal screeds on Twitter.
We should have the technology to not be bound to them by now. I'm not talking about sex bots, I'm talking about artificial wombs. Then all the tradcucks can have their kid and we don't have to hear about how women are important ever again.
Nothing strikes more fear in the hearts of female supremacists than men co-operating across divisions to make their purpose obsolete.
The tradcuck's good women argument is the greatest weapon of the female supremacist.
Has nothing to do with hate. It has to do with incompatibility. Not all Jews subvert, but they subvert disproportionately, and its corrosive to western society. Every bit as destabilizing as disproportionate criminality.
Incompatibility of what?
If 'subversion' (what you call these dumb opinions of the SJWs) is the problem, why are you only interested in it when you can pin it on a certain ethnic group? I don't understand.
Whites are disproportionately criminal compared to East Asians. So would you say that whites are a "destabilizing" element, and what exactly is it destabilizing?