It's way worse than that. He's thinking in terms of raw tribalism. In his mind, no white people have the right to judge any black person under any circumstances. He sees this as "one of yours taking one of ours". That's it.
At a population level, this is how every non-white ethnicity in the world operates. Everything from democracy to law enforcement is nothing but a racial referendum in the vast majority of nations. We simply don't notice it because most nations are far more ethnically homogeneous than Western nations are today. The proliferation of non-white demos throughout the West has laid bare this fundamental disparity in how we think of democracy and rule of law. We're seeing it almost everywhere you find a black district attorney or judge.
I call BS. Most people in the world don't think in terms of skin color at all. Same for most whites. That's a mostly American pathology. Most conflicts are between people of the very same skin color. Culture is king.
Even in your country. Latinos in California voted against that horrible Proposition 16 which would have allowed racial discrimination in their favor.
That's why he used the phrase "non-white ethnicity" instead of skin color. Though it happens with white ethnicities plenty too. Ethnicity is best defined by cultural circles.
Most people in the world for sure think of skin color, it was just irrelevant until recently to even give it a second thought because of how color homogeneous they were. The Japs didn't need an opinion on black people beyond a novelty, but they for sure had strong opinions on Koreans. Before Katrina, Louisiana mostly didn't have opinions on Mexicans and Immigration because there weren't any (until they were imported to rebuild New Orleans), but we certainly had strong opinions on Indians and Blacks.
People with high metabolisms never need to count calories or carbs. But if age takes that metabolism away, they will become mindful of it then.
It's way worse than that. He's thinking in terms of raw tribalism. In his mind, no white people have the right to judge any black person under any circumstances. He sees this as "one of yours taking one of ours". That's it.
At a population level, this is how every non-white ethnicity in the world operates. Everything from democracy to law enforcement is nothing but a racial referendum in the vast majority of nations. We simply don't notice it because most nations are far more ethnically homogeneous than Western nations are today. The proliferation of non-white demos throughout the West has laid bare this fundamental disparity in how we think of democracy and rule of law. We're seeing it almost everywhere you find a black district attorney or judge.
I call BS. Most people in the world don't think in terms of skin color at all. Same for most whites. That's a mostly American pathology. Most conflicts are between people of the very same skin color. Culture is king.
Even in your country. Latinos in California voted against that horrible Proposition 16 which would have allowed racial discrimination in their favor.
Latinos in California voted against prop 16 because they don't like black people lol
That's why he used the phrase "non-white ethnicity" instead of skin color. Though it happens with white ethnicities plenty too. Ethnicity is best defined by cultural circles.
Most people in the world for sure think of skin color, it was just irrelevant until recently to even give it a second thought because of how color homogeneous they were. The Japs didn't need an opinion on black people beyond a novelty, but they for sure had strong opinions on Koreans. Before Katrina, Louisiana mostly didn't have opinions on Mexicans and Immigration because there weren't any (until they were imported to rebuild New Orleans), but we certainly had strong opinions on Indians and Blacks.
People with high metabolisms never need to count calories or carbs. But if age takes that metabolism away, they will become mindful of it then.