One of those articles uses the phrase "Trump's own 'Deep State'", which implicitly acknowledges the existence of another one.
In that comment thread you state your main categorical error is failing to assume your enemies are "delusionally insane". I have found I have a similar error in reasoning. We are dealing with people who would appoint a horse to the Senate not to insult or humiliate other Senators but because their notions of Social Justice, Diversity, and Equity require that a horse be able to serve as Senator. And they are willing to back those notions with brutal force against an unwilling populace if necessary.
You know they'll never acknowledge that. "Trump's own 'Deep State'" in their parlance is "Trump imagined a Deep State fighting against him. Now he's building his own, to fight for him!"
I've lost track of the current narrative. What's the MSM's opinion this week? Deep state doesn't exist? Deep state is great? Trump is the deep state?
Not, the MSM's opinion is that the Deep State is currently being installed by Donald Trump.
So, yes, Trump is the Deep State.
One of those articles uses the phrase "Trump's own 'Deep State'", which implicitly acknowledges the existence of another one.
In that comment thread you state your main categorical error is failing to assume your enemies are "delusionally insane". I have found I have a similar error in reasoning. We are dealing with people who would appoint a horse to the Senate not to insult or humiliate other Senators but because their notions of Social Justice, Diversity, and Equity require that a horse be able to serve as Senator. And they are willing to back those notions with brutal force against an unwilling populace if necessary.
You know they'll never acknowledge that. "Trump's own 'Deep State'" in their parlance is "Trump imagined a Deep State fighting against him. Now he's building his own, to fight for him!"