Which one you are, a comrade or just a fellow traveller idiot?
The first Brooks was Rayshard Brooks.
And now it's the Hero-City of Ukraine, injured and scarred after months of rocket blitz in which more than 1,000 residents died in random attacks and half of population of 1.4 million turned into refugees. And your besties talked about erasing it from the map today.
If by puppet country you mean the Kharkov People's Republic, it ceased to exist before it could be restored after it was originally destroyed literally overnight in 2014.
More importantly and the fake countries aside, Izyum was Russia's military center of every sort for the entire Northern front. Which itself barely even exist anymore after being rolled up, and it's now more like an extension of the Eastern front. It used to go continously through the entire northern Ukraine.
Nice to see you openly supporting warmongering and stopping pretending you're "anti-war". And that's a funny thing, the same people who just recently used to pretend to fare about the supposedly "Russian" population of Kharkiv, so waiting for them with flowers (they didn't), now call for the total destruction of this huge city after giving a "24 or 48 hours" warning in revenge for the people of Kharkiv turning against and beating back the invaders (even Yanukovych's own former regional boss in Kharkiv has joined the territorial defense) and since then having renamed everything Russian (which they haven't done 2014-2022, they even had Moscow Street where a bunch of Russian police commandos were wasted on like the second day) and even stopped talking Russian.
The overall map (not some zoomed in up details) is generally the same one map and only schizos can question it.
And even Russian state TV is bemused that, to quote, "we're supposed to be celebrating capturing 3 houses in Pervomayskoye [in the continuous crawl speed Bamut frontal attack by Wagner for several months now, currently trying to push trough a literal garbage dump] while they take 17 settlements in a day [Northern Kherson sector]".
It's in a jest.
Mostly.
I will speak out when the Azovtsy come for you.
What I may say it's another thing lol
I mean, this is where I woke up and you're still not disappeared in their "final racial crusade".
That's disappointing.
Why don't you just find Russian maps nad compare so you will believe then? There's literally nothing controversial about this map, it's not this stage of war, and both sides have simply an info blackout on the ongoing Kherson City showdown so not even there.
The schizo's post was ironic in the context of Russian state TV currently discussing hitting "Musk's sputniks" with nuclear weapons and other retarded plots where everyone dies (literally, that's what they say themselves): https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1584838677246533632
And totally seriously speaking, I'm very curious whatever did you mean by "eagerly assaulted innocents that didn't want to lay down their lives for Zelensky".
Nah we buds, really.
Now, elements of Azov have spoken about coming for the pidarasty and the sandniggers, and I didn't speak out because I'm not u/AntonioOfVenice, and next they classified me as a liberal and there were no one left to speak out for me, but then it all turned out to be a dream and even Antonio wasn't taken away to be forced watching flags being trampled (this is his personal Room 101 nightmare) down in the biolabs.
Lmao where do you even find this shit? It's not even in the Russian propaganda for the Russians, I'm really curious now.
Black Panther was Jewish American wild fiction about Africa based on generally nothing, it's just creative.
The Witcher is Polish fiction about Europe based mostly about Western European mythologies and histories (only marginally Eastern European, especially after the first short stories, contrary to the popular meme), also some blatant plagiarism from a relatively obscure English fantasy author named Moorcock who doesn't care about it.
Propaganda? I didnt see such "narrative", especially since they gained iniative months ago, they don't even talk much about the UPA historically as they have more than enough heroes to celebrate among themselves as they shout Glory to Heroes, and they don't present themselves as anything "scrappy" but as superior to the enemy, and being better armed and the enemy having shit for gear is included in this. It's the "narrative" of power and domination, and even in Russia they currently show the same actually (that is, Ukraine being better armed, trained, supplied, commanded, reconed, "we're fighting against all strenght of NATO") to explain their setbacks. So did you just imagine it?
This is an example of a typical Ukrainian propaganda video, with the usual themes: https://twitter.com/clashreport/status/1521389880596516864
I have zero idea what do you mean by "eagerly assaulted innocents that didn't want to lay down their lives for Zelensky".
Saved for your delicious tears after the final victory.
Currently, liberating ever last inch of Ukraine in 1991 borders, end of Putin, war criminal trials (ICC), and the reparations from Russia. The possible implosion of Russia may just come along (and in which case Ukraine will likely want to take some too).
It's not "West's objective", it's their objective.
I see you people don't understand this, and I'm going to explain this to you as to hopefully comprehend.
You probably won't be able to find any nation more nationalistic than the Ukrainians, not in Europe at least. Ukrainian nationalism (often called "ultranationalism" and correctly so) is just incredibly hardcore and total, it's their actual religion besides their other religions (and they're extremely religious). The red and blue colors you may often see mean literally "Blood & Soil" (Ukraine's black earth).
Russians know who they fight, this is why they say "ukrainskiye natsionalisty" (and variants, many pejorative or sensationalist, as with the popular "Ukronatzisty" - the word "Nazism" itself is a neologism in Russia that was imported from the West only starting in the 1990s).
Croatian nationalism is kinda similar even if not that extreme, and they did take all of Croatia. And then they went down to Bosnia to quickly smash the Serbs also there, because of the Bosnian Croats living in Herzegovina.
Go find a map claiming otherwise. It can be any official Russian map, can be from Russian TV, can be from General Konashenkov, can be even from Strelkov before he mobilized himself. Show me this alternate reality existing anywhere outside your mind.
It's not any "rebel group", despite Russians habitually calling them "militants" (and "terrorists", increasingly). It's government national forces.
Even Russian state TV propaganda openly despairs about this, telling the viewers in clear terms that Russia won't be able to regain initiative in at minimum 2 next months of Ukrainians keeping advancing into the now "Russian soil" because they made it Russian so it's "Nazis invading Russia" and they can't be stopped.
But you retards take your news from I just have no idea where.
Writing "the US is so worried and trying to drop a nuclear bomb on Moscow, right" is "Recognizing geopolitical realities"?
No, they're trying to drop Moon on Moscow.
Flashback 2020:
The fan response to Netflix’s The Witcher was very diverse. From love to hate and everything in between. The aspect that was discussed more than others among fans was the writing and various writing decisions. Showrunner Lauren S. Hissrich offers a look into her practise of hiring writers for the show.
“When writing an adaptation, are the best writers always the ones most familiar with the world?”, she started. “Yes. And equally importantly, no.”
She continued: “Let me back up. When you write an adaptation, you have to be familiar with the original work. Yes. Of course. The writers and staff on The Witcher had to read all of the books, and had to appreciate/enjoy the genre. But I specifically didn’t seek out ten Sapkowski scholars.”
Earlier, Lauren offered a look into her other criteria for hiring The Witcher‘s writing staff.
“When hiring writers for The Witcher, there were several factors I looked at to make sure we were getting the best possible team. In no particular order:
A spectrum of writing experience: people who’d been at it for 20 years and those who were brand new. It’s part of my job to mentor the next generation of writers, just as I was once trained. But I also need people who know television structure and production inside and out.
A spectrum of life experience. This is where diversity comes in. A POC has different experiences than a white person; men different than women; straight different than gay. Add in immigrants, adoptees, parents, the list goes on. Varied life experiences make the show richer.
They were using British and American technology and mind (there was no embargo).
Elaborate, comrade.