5
YesMovement 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here's a translation but the guy who wrote it ends his tweet with "Easy on the Canadian patriotism there, fella." so it may not be completely reliable: https://x.com/MBrant75/status/1832602082513170578

“A vote for Craig Sauvé and the NDP is a vote for:

Call for an immediate ceasefire, demand the release of all hostages and send more humanitarian aid to Gaza

Demand a bilateral embargo on the sale of military goods and technologies with Israel

Call for sanctions on Israeli ministers who have made genocidal remarks

Demand immediate and concrete measures to implement the decision of the International Court of Justice

Demand concrete actions for justice, peace and security for everyone in the region

Demand recognition of the State of Palestine

On September 16, send a strong message to Ottawa: stop the genocide in Gaza.”

21
YesMovement 21 points ago +21 / -0

To be fair... https://x.com/ouch_canada/status/1832614787458510876

sure 💯 agree but what is this I see in your own profile? How can you say they don't put Canada first when your own profile banner is Stand with Israel? You're a Canadian Mayor. Stand for Canada. Take that shit off your profile too you hypocrite.

23
YesMovement 23 points ago +23 / -0

A reminder that not only has Tayler, like Chen or anyone else, not been charged with anything- even the DOJ's own inditement says Tayler, Tim & everyone else are the unwitting victims of the crime they're alleging and have yet to even prove happened.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just because an internet celebrity won't respond to every "DID YOU FUCK PERSON X????" is nowhere near approaching the levels of evidence. If I were famous I'd ignore those kind of claims too- you answer 1 then you have to answer every other one and then dumbasses just keep throwing names at you and if you ever get tired of denying they scream "SEE, PROOF! WHY WON'T THEY JUST DENY IT???????"

It's gay, teenage high school drama shit- stop it, be better.

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's basically the millennial Hannity- he parrots whatever the popular positions in the movement are at the moment and never once comes up with anything original to say. Nor does he ever seem to hold any contrarian views on any topic.

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Benny adds nothing to his content, and is a leach who somehow made it big.

YA BOY BENNY really just shares other people's shit, does he ever actually create anything new? And he just seems to parrot Trump talking points.

5
YesMovement 5 points ago +5 / -0

If the allegations are true, it's weird they tried so hard to get Tim Pool and the like onboard, but didn't ask him for anything.

That's the funny thing, it's not like any of the hires seemed to have a shift in beliefs or start talking about stuff they weren't talking about before. Other than Matt & Tayler they all had pretty big followings before and pretty much everyone knew who they were, so it's not like this gave them some big platform.

So what was their plan exactly??

Step 1. Fund new media company

Step 2. ?????

Step 3. Trick Westerners into loving glorious Russia

10
YesMovement 10 points ago +10 / -0

The DOJ's own indictment said the the contributors weren't implicated.

Southern has been silent, she and Chen go back farther than anyone else so maybe she knew something but I think they kept that hidden from everyone including White Lauren.

4
YesMovement 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just saw "This page isn't available. Sorry about that. Try searching for something else."

Beanie, Benny & Rubin are bitches but I still kinda like Lauren, Tayler Hansen is a great hardcore reporter though- sucks for him. I have no real feelings on Matt.

3
YesMovement 3 points ago +3 / -0

Neither do most Canadians. Here's the gist:

  1. The current Prime Minister appoints someone when there's an opening

  2. The Queen (now King Cuck) rubber stamps it

  3. The person then serves until 75, working for the party that has usually been thrown out of power long ago and able to block the legislation passed by the actual elected House of Commons.

  4. The person turns 75, retires and we go back to 1.

Justin claimed "senate reform" by kicking all the Liberal Senators out of the liberal party but they almost all united together (as have every single new one Justin's appointed) as the "Independent Senators Group" that votes with Justin more often than the Liberal Party senators did.

He also claims the "Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointment" he created makes the choices but he literally controls that too.

3
YesMovement 3 points ago +3 / -0

And he makes it look super easy, barely an inconvenience!

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

Know what section 1 of the charter is, essentially it's 1st amendment?

That the rights about to be listed can if fact be violated if someone really feels like it should.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

3
YesMovement 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even more bullshit because they're still hearing a much smaller case about a woman who wasn't allowed to travel to 1 province to visit a sick relative.

Yet this case that impacted millions of Canadians, brought on by a former cabinet minister & current leader of a political party AND a former Premier whose the last living person to sign the charter saying the charter was violated...nah we cool, fam.

18
YesMovement 18 points ago +19 / -1

https://x.com/MaximeBernier/status/1829187365660749991

I’m extremely disappointed by the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision to dismiss our appeal in the case against the tyrannical Liberal travel ban for the unvaccinated.

We obviously cannot trust the courts anymore in this country to uphold our constitutional rights and freedoms. Too many of them have been hijacked by far-left woke activists masquerading as judges.

There is only one solution: inform and educate, change the climate of opinion, to make sure more Canadians are awakened, and no future government dares to implement such awful discriminatory policies again.

This is what the PPC has been doing and will continue to do.

35
YesMovement 35 points ago +35 / -0

Note how he's also dehumanizing RFK, saying Dahmer is the human being while he's literally an animal.

For endorsing a former president.

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

Randy Savage elbow drop but he was only maybe 5'10-11, then the ones Froze mentions. Most main eventers did ground impact moves- leg drop brother, Stone Cold Stunner, chokeslam, powerbomb, etc. Undertaker would tightrope walk the ropes while holding onto a guy but it wasn't his finisher.

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

Being a big guy wasn’t a career hindrance back then - if anything it was a shortcut to stardom.

Sid was legit a terrible wrestler, and I say this as a Sid fan. But he was huge and had this charisma and you were legit afraid of him because he was big and crazy.

Also look at Giant Gonzales, Great Khali, Haystacks Calhoun, Uncle Elmer, Mabel/Viscera, etc...all really shitty wrestlers but had major matches- Mabel was King of the Ring & Khali was even world champion. No average sized person with the same in-ring ability would make it on the worst indie show.

7
YesMovement 7 points ago +7 / -0

Even NWA territories had big guys often in major positions. With freakishly big guys who couldn't really work they would often build them up so they could challenge the champ and "steal a house" by getting a main event title match out of them before they got exposed.

And their top stars like Flair, Sting, etc weren't "big men" but weren't small. I don't think Dusty Rhodes was doing a lot of high flying moves.

15
YesMovement 15 points ago +15 / -0

Seriously this is like someone whose a complete idiot that's never watched wrestling wouldn't even say because they'd know about Andre The Giant, Hulk Hogan & The Rock at least.

Up until very recently smaller guys couldn't even break into wrestling. Back in the 80s guys like the Rock n' Roll Express were considered "small" and they're both (billed anyways) at 5'11 & ~225 lbs.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

What on earth does the headline mean, what possible jokes could you come up???

Ohhhhhh wait, I think I got it...CANDY Crush because Americans are FAT. That's what you meant, right guys?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›