I'm a strong proponent of 1936, especially if you have the power of foreknowledge:

too young to really remember the dustbowl

childhood in segregated schools

too young to fight in WW2 (obviously)

too young to fight in Korea

can enjoy a full 18+ year long career in any pro sport you want, if that's what you like, with much less "competition"

can go into TV or film when it's a much freer industry and you can make whatever you want

can get into gaming super early on, be an arcade or pinball pioneer or get hands-on with the earlier console gens and innovate where the giants failed

can get any other job you might want, first try, and you don't even need to apply yourself, plus you get some great pay

teenager in the 1950s

23/24 at the start of the 1960s

too old to fight in Vietnam

can go to basically any gig of any well-loved act up to 1990 and see them in their early prime

food cheap for most of your life, and good in ways that don't exist anymore (such as tallow-cooked fries)

cars cheap for most of your life, and you can drive some of today's most desirable classics for pennies on the dollar when they're brand new

can fly on concorde for most of your life

regular flights are still 100x better than they are today

minimal if any faggotry

72 years old by the time the economy crashes in 2008, so almost certainly retired before it can do any damage to your savings

That's all. That's the post.

This faggy shit keeps getting shoved in my face, and as far as I can tell, it's literally just yaoi slashfiction with a seven digit budget.

Hockey players, but guess what? They're gay! And they play for opposing teams!

Please tell me there's more to it than that.

Apparently every episode is deserving of a 9/10 or higher on IMDb, with tens of thousands of thoroughly wet roasties jilling off in the background.

I'll preface this by saying I have no idea how much the movies changed from the books, but during all 3, Gollum is very consistently characterised:

Looks vampiric and sickly

Obsessed with gold, in this case the Rang o' Powah

Has a true name (Smeagol) that he doesn't want others to know

Pretends to be friendly to gain others' trust

Always looks weak in public and pretends to be the victim as much as possible

Generalizes anyone that isn't him with derogatory terms ("tricksy false hobbitses")

Staged a false flag by making Samwise look as though he ate the bread

Acts in a manner so that friends become enemies by only revealing his true intentions in front of Sam to make his aggression seem unwarranted

If you hit the "block" button on any user's comment, it doesn't just hide their comments. It basically acts like they don't exist. You don't even see "hidden due to blocked account" or anything like that which would otherwise indicate you've made that choice. They're just not there. The only way you can even see their content beyond that point is by manually typing in their account name.

And that's probably the best way to deal with people like those. Can't keep spoofing your IP like you used to be able to on anonymous imageboards to annoy every genuine user. Have to make a brand new account from scratch, which is often hidden anyway. Just let these people spend 18 hours a day every single day screaming into a digital void from which no-one will ever read their comments. Once they realize no-one gives a fuck about them, they'll leave.

There were some comments from users such as Gizortnik and others in this thread which I felt were too good to simply leave in their respective thread (especially if those posts and/or users get deleted later on), and I also wanted to impart some additional thoughts from my end without getting buried in a chain of replies. Credit to those original posters. Feel free to share more nuggets of information in here too.

Leftists were always this violent.

They just got better at hiding it, ironically because of Gamergate. Remember how openly smug they acted back then? They thought labeling someone a "shitlord" and "neckbeard" was all they needed to unperson someone. Remember how activists like Big Red became laughing stocks?

Once those labels became ineffective, they escalated: racist, sexist, transphobe, alt-right, nazi, fascist, etc. But the desired outcome remained the same. They wanted us gone. "No bad tactics, only bad targets".

They became better at obfuscating their intentions, they hide behind platitudes and slogans. But they never came up with any new argument because the majority of normies are "rote thinkers" (they reason in terms of singular "if A then B" factoids, unable to process analytically). They will adopt a position based solely on mere exposure to attitudes toward that position. In the year 2000, Christina Hoff Sommers released a book called "The War on Boys". It documents the destruction of our society by what we'd now recognize as our ideological enemies.

The left wanted to kill people like her, Erin Pizzey and others for years before Gamergate. #killallmen was and is a thing, just ask Clementine Ford or Bahar Mustafa, two names you've almost certainly long forgotten by this point. But they certainly haven't forgotten you. They called for your death on the Dorsey-controlled Twitter, and they completely got away with it. Because none of the infrastructure we have today was yet in place. They could get away with this shit back then, out in the open as well.

As Sam Hyde said, they want you dead. Your children brainwashed and transitioned. Your sister raped and murdered. Because that is what they are after. They hate people having privileges that they don't.

Hell, that's where the whole "check your privilege" argument came from. It was never about despising the uber-privileged; hence why they worship so many of the far-left darlings like Bernie Sanders whose favorite form of public transport is his Audi R8. They just hate normal people like you and me leapfrogging them. Hence their blinding hatred for landlords, yet they don't give a shit about companies or commie governments hostilely taking over entire fucking neighborhoods.

And I think you really got to see it with the OceanGate incident. Millions of people cheering over the deaths of super-rich individuals who never did a fucking thing to them. Making memes over the way they died. Simply because they were obscenely rich.

We saw it again with the cult of Luigi. The idea of "Luigi'ing" every single person you don't agree with. In fact, that's where I'd argue the inspiration behind killing Kirk came from. They just want to "Luigi" their opposition so they may never open their mouth again. Because now they're being chased out of their hugboxes and are losing control of the narrative completely.

There have been 3 major periods of Leftist violence in America, and none of them are referred to as left-wing terror campaigns.

• The Labor / Coal Wars of the late 1800s
• The Red Scares of the Interwar Period
• The Days Of Rage Campaign of the 1970s

All of these comprised hundreds if not thousands of shootouts, bombings, riots, assassinations, and more, normally as part of a wider terror campaign internationally. The most recent one was the 2020 Black National Socialist Kristallnacht, which also expanded into Canada's Red Terror against Catholics and the burning of 16 churches, and the vandalization of 40 others.

Of all the major terrorist attacks or offensives in history, here's the ones nobody talks about, and were all left-wing:

• Wall Street Bombing - 30 killed and over 100 wounded in the largest terrorist attack of it's time
• Sterling Hall Bombing - 1 killed, but the Communist conspirators almost entirely got off. The primary conspirator served only 7 years, became a hot dog vendor, and said he'd do it again. It was the inspiration for the OKC bombing. Canada refused to extradite them on terrorist charges because they could have faced the death penalty.
• Burning of Kent State ROTC building - Attempt to murder 300 cadets while they slept, and is why the National Guard were at Kent State in the first place.

When the Ohio National Guard were separated and attacked by rioters, they shot into the air and hit several random students. That is the only part that anyone hears about. Nobody in the media at the time wanted to accept it, and despite their best efforts, especially to this day since KSU is still lefty anyway, they want to bury the fact that most people agreed with what the Governor was doing. They still claim crazy things like the NG troops fired directly into the crowd, which wasn't possible considering the injuries came from all over campus, as they were firing into the air. They were firing into the air because the Communists were hurling stones, bricks, and bottles into their face, and they had backed themselves into a fence and could no longer maneuver. The reason that none of the guardsmen were charged was because the courts deduced that they were in reasonable fear for their lives given that communists hand seized the University, burned down the ROTC building, and were using weapons that could cause them grievous bodily harm.

Not that the Left are prepared to admit that. Where the guard actually fucked up is that they were the ones who maneuvered themselves out of position, and no one actually came to assist or evacuate them. Basically, the reason no one gave an order to fire, is because the men were trying to get Communists to stop pelting them with bricks, and they felt their lives were in danger.

Here's some more:

• 1954 Congressional Shooting - Puerto Rican Separatists attempted to machine gun the entire US Congress wounding 5 people before being shot at and captured by the Sergeant At Arms. (The second attempt to murder most of the legislature was the Baseball game shooting).
• MOVE Firefight (1978) - Black Separatist Communist organization takes over a portion of Philadelphia in an insurrection and kills 1 police officers and wounds 13 others in a major gunbattle
• MOVE Siege (1985) - The same group does the same thing, but this time after another major gunbattle, they are hit with an incendiary bomb to force them out of the building. You always hear about the bombing, but never why.
• Attica Prison Hostage Crisis (1971) - 43 Killed, 42 hostages were taken, 90 Wounded. Bloodiest prison "riot" that I can even think of in US history

And just to be clear only The Wallstreet Bombing is even referred to as a Leftist Terrorist attack on Wikipedia.

There's so much more. It's unfathomable. Political violence from Leftist ideology represents the vast and sweeping majority of all political violence in American history. There are fucking enormous amounts of Leftist violence in America and history and absolutely none of them are affiliated with the Left. Here's a good one:

Jonestown was a Leftist suicide event. People don't even talk about the fact that Jim Jones was directly involved in California Democrat politics, including Diane Feinstein directly. Jonestown was a Leftist Commune. He decided to kill all of his followers when it appeared that the local government would have him arrested, and his appeals to the Soviet Union were rejected. When Jim Jones' men killed two US congressmen who came down to work with him on letting people go, that's when he decided to execute everyone.

I bet you no one in any documentary of any stripe ever said a word about how well Jim Jones was connected to the California Democrats, and how his cult was a Leftist organization.

And you can keep going back from there. Spain, 1930s Spain, the one that Franco ended up seizing power over, is portrayed as the start of a right-wing dictatorship. But it only emerged because of far-left terror!

In the decades since his death, you always, ALWAYS hear about all the "poor oppwessed minowities", especially the Basques, who "suffered" under Franco's rule. But you never fucking hear the why.

Because they don't want you to hear it.

Why? Because the same fucking bloodthirsty psychos that had taken Russia were trying to do the exact same thing to Spain. They were slaughtering any fucking Catholic they saw. They were digging up the corpses of nuns and posing for sick photographs with them, which TO THIS FUCKING DAY redditors try to deny as "right-wingers trying to make the left look bad".

Digging up the corpses of rotting nuns at a time photography wasn't readily available or displayable once you captured them. Totally a thing the right-wing would do. Not because the left-wing are perverse, demonic freaks and always have been.

It's the same story with Ireland too. The IRA has always represented far-left terror disguising itself under a much more agreeable "Nationalist" facade. But it is just as much commie insurgent bullshit as ETA was.

Before the IRA had enough credibility to get foreign funding and political support, they funded their operations with bank robberies carried out in the Republic of Ireland. The Republic of Ireland was already free and running things their way. There was absolutely no reason for the IRA to conduct any of their business there. The part of the IRA that went active in the late '60s in the six counties that had stayed with the royal crown (Ulster) was predominantly communist in nature and was all about using capitalist money stolen from banks to fund an insurgency and bring about a unified Ireland under a single socialist government.

It was never about "liberating the 6 counties" from English rule, of which many never had a problem with it to start with. It was an earnest attempt to turn the whole island commie. Cuba tactics, but in Europe.

A big part of 'The Troubles' were physical forms of economic terrorism. The IEDs they were famous for primarily served the purpose of destroying property, interfering with the day to day operation of Protestant and thus presumably British-owned businesses and of course using to fear to coerce government action.

If you look back to any riot which had a serious amount of property damage, it will ALWAYS lead back to the far left. In 2019, there was a right-wing Gilets Jaunes protest in France, and at one point, those protesting began to approach someone's parked Citroen DS. The Gilets Jaunes actually ended up forming a protective barrier around the car to prevent it being vandalized. Compare that to several years later, in the SAME CITY, where some retards protested a Moroccan kid getting their cap peeled. They broke into a fucking classic car dealer and torched a 50 year old Lancia for literally no reason.

They did it not because they particularly wanted to; they did it because they could. A year later in America, the George Floyd riots and all the damage to businesses which were inflicted, particularly Uncle Hugo's comic book store. In fact, if you go back to the '92 LA Riots, there's a very famous video of a black business owner on the verge of tears because his business had been destroyed by people of his own skin color. He couldn't comprehend it. He couldn't fathom that his own kind would turn on him like that. But here's the thing, they use chaos to create more decay. They hate order. They hate good things. And if they see your beautiful oak door, they WILL break it up for firewood.

Russia and China especially are probably the two most heartbreaking examples. So much culture destroyed in such a short amount of time. Many of the Faberge Eggs were probably stomped and hammered to scrap simply because of what they represented with zero regard to their artistic merit. If they can blow up a 700 year old castle (Konigsberg), then they'll take no umbrage with mere trinkets. And remember this - the Russian royal family were slaughtered like animals. They weren't jailed, exiled, or enslaved. They were shot to pieces, one by one. Even the children. Because they have always been a violent blood cult with no sense of morals.

Therefore, in closing, we give these people precisely ZERO QUARTER.

Whenever a leftshit whines about being (deservedly) fired for their comments over Charlie Kirk, remind them of the guy they got fired for donating $25 to Rittenhouse's legal defense fund. Or Shirtgate. Or Donglegate. Or the various teachers fired for not being utterly shitty human beings. Or the people bullied to tears because they dared played Hogwarts Legacy. Or the people bullied to suicide over their art. Or the people fired or barred from attending college for fifteen year old tweets. Or all the tyrannical bullshit they pulled during COVID in the name of "our safety". Priests forbidden from giving masses. Families broken up and arrested for celebrating Thanksgiving. Old, vulnerable relatives left to slowly die in complete isolation. Fuck each and every one of them.

You can never hate the left enough. They have always wanted you dead. Now, they no longer bother to hide it.

Has anyone else noticed that a more effective means of controlling a specific narrative is for the news to outrightly ignore it?

You notice it a lot with right-aligned protests. The Million MAGA March in late 2020 was barely covered by anyone, even though it was the direct precursor to J6. The Honkening was largely ignored (except for the Toronto residents losing their sleep, haha) UNTIL it began to threaten the local economy several days in. Then the military and mask-wearing brownshirts were called in and things were broken up within 24 hours.

I'm noticing it again with Unite The Kingdom. There's been a bit more media coverage this time thanks to Tommy and Elon's appearances (in addition to Kirk's assassination boosting things) and the march itself quite frankly being too big to sweep under the rug, but it definitely did not draw the right level of coverage it merited. The entire center of London was ground to a standstill, and yet most news outlets treated it as a tertiary headline.

Compare that to left-aligned protests with much smaller crowds, like Extinction Rebellion and the rest of the orange paint faggots (as well as BLM grifters) and they always make the front page and extended TV coverage. Hell, those dumb African retards in the Scottish highlands are getting arguably more news coverage than UTK did in their own damn country.

This is a fallacy I have discovered on my own, apologies if anyone else might have covered this in the past.

In Japan, male-on-female sexual assault became such a bad problem in its society that they instituted female-only subway cars and forced mobile phone manufacturers to add an audible shutter sound you cannot disable.

Many retards and cucks use this as supposed "evidence" that Japan is therefore a low-trust society where you are liable to be sexually assaulted, especially if you're a lone woman.

But the reality is likely this.

Until recently, Japan was a "proactive" society. That is to say, if a problem arises, it will be dealt with promptly and thoroughly to prevent it from happening again. Much of the world operated like this for a majority of the 20th Century; it's only since the 1970s many Western nations have done a u-turn on this way of thinking.

Japan didn't have a perv problem; a few pervs alarmed the Jap government who wanted to nip this sort of thing in the bud. So they did.

But the problem is, this is no longer the norm in much of the world. They let problems fester and be "part and parcel" of normal day-to-day life. So when they see another country that actually ACTS on their threats to society, they believe in the illusion that these crimes are an epidemic in countries such as Japan. Because that's the only way they have ever known, growing up in countries like the UK, USA, Canada, Sweden etc.

The only example of a proactive society I can earnestly name that exists today is El Salvador, maybe Singapore too given their stances towards hard drugs. Philippines under Duterte came close but the guy was a legit retard sometimes. Argentina is also close but Milei(kowsky) is likely compromised.

Are the same people who:

Want fully-grown, mentally ill 40 year old men to share the same bathroom as your pre-pubescent daughter

Want said daughter (and sons) to be taught, in great detail how fag relationships work (up to and including the degenerate sex acts)

Want to turn said son or daughter into a mockery of the opposite, a "therian" furfag, or a death statistic

Think that biological gay men who still have their cocks (or have had them turned into an axewound) should be desired by "cis" men instead of reviled

That it's empowering for a woman to look like or even be a slut (see Bonnie Blue), yet misogynistic if you treat her like one

Believe OnlyFans and other types of "sex work" are valid means of employment for women, should not be shamed, and should not be taxed

Are the biggest advocates of jew daycare and think the rest of the female sex should be cooped up in cubicles all day instead of raising a family

Don't see any problems with mass migration from low intelligence, low income nations and believe any fears or concerns are just good old-fashioned WAYCISM

Did I miss anything?

There's a post someone on here made recently that resonated with me. Basically, we have conditioned the new generation of men into believing women only magically become sexy at the age of 18, and even then, if you're over 35, anyone under the age of 23 is "still a child", even if they can legally vote, drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes.

And this is just weird to me. I grew up when men, including my own father would actively wolf-whistle to some of my teenaged female classmates, and although I chastised him for it, never thought it was out of the ordinary. They wore skinny jeans and yoga pants, had shapely posteriors and in some cases, big boobs. Legally, there's an obvious problem but societally, I don't think it's that big of an issue.

Let's say for the sake of example you're a recently-married man, you're both aged 21, and one day, your wife sits you down to go through some of her old photos.

We start with photos of her as a baby. Now, you'd have to be one sick fuck (or Ian Watkins) to find her hot in her infancy. A normal male brain would find her adorable.

Then she shows you a picture of when she was 20, a year earlier. Perfectly fine in finding this one hot, as this was when you already knew her quite well.

Then she shows you her toddler photos. Again, nothing to find attractive, only cute.

19 years old, just before the pair of you introduced. Largely the same woman you knew the first time you met her, just slightly younger. Sexy, right?

Then Grade School.

Then College.

Until eventually she converges around age 10, before any of her body has matured. You shouldn't be finding that attractive, purely because she's still evidently a child and none of her assets have yet bloomed.

Now, society wants you to think 18 is your cut-off point. The point just before sexy becomes adorable.

But I'd willing to bet any man in this hypothetical scenario wouldn't call 18 the earliest your wife looked "sexy". Let's imply her birthday is one week after Halloween, and one year, she decided to dress as your favorite fictional character.

Only problem is, she was 17 when those photos were taken. Or 16. Or perhaps even 15.

She still has fully-developed boobs with visible cleavage and thighs. Her height is well into 5' territory. But she's underaged in those photos.

Would you still find her sexy?

Let's do a bit of an experiment here. This scene from the 1991 movie Career Opportunities.

This is basically the only scene in the entire movie people remember. A 19 year old Jennifer Connelly riding a coin-operated horse. I know she's half Jewish and all that, but I would say that this is as close to "objectively sexy" as you can get. Her body is nubile and fully developed. She's hot.

So if you found her hot here, what's stopping you from feeling the same way towards her appearance in the 1989 movie Étoile, filmed in 1988 when she was 17?

How about this performance from a French TV show of the singer Alizée?

Granted, this was filmed in early 2003, and she was born in August 1984. So she's 18 here. Everything is fine and above board, although there are a lot of moralfags who think even this is wrong nowadays.

So here she is in June 2002, aged 17.

Now we're enter "problematic" territory again. She's not of legal age in the US, yet she still looks basically the same as she did in the 2003 video. A very similar body with accentuated thighs and chest. If you found her sexy in 2003, there's no reason you shouldn't also find her sexy here.

But 17 isn't that big of a deal, all things considered. So how about we look at something like this, "Cherry Bomb" by The Runaways?

Lead singer Cherrie Currie was born in late 1959, music video came out early 1976... you do the math. She's 16 here. Find her hot, you are statutorily a pedophile.

Or how about the most famous music video of my generation, Britney Spears' One More Time?

Yeah, she's 16 here too. You're a pedophile if you find her hot.

All The Things She Said by t.A.T.u?

Both of them were aged 15 in this video. A million sexual awakenings, but not because of faux lesbianism. But because you secretly had a thing for kids, you filthy pedophile! Off to the woodchipper!

Granted, a lot of this has been caused by over-sexualization of our culture, of people wearing things they shouldn't because they've been pressured into wearing them. But even if you take those items of clothing and make-up away, mid-late teens still have fully developed bodies. They are ovulating. Their breasts are ready to nurture an infant. The only reason you aren't allowed to be interested in females that age is because legally, they cannot be held responsible for actions they might initiate. We as men have to pretend not to be interested in them and the way we're going, any fully grown man won't be allowed to find anyone under the age of 26 sexy by the mid-point of this century.

So what gives? Anyone agree with me here?

In July 2017, Liev Schreiber, an actor of Israeli heritage known for the role of TV's Ray Donovan attended Comic-Con with his two sons, Alex and Samuel Kai (the latter now just Kai, which is kind of hilarious if you know common troon names). The latter attended in a Harley Quinn outfit. This was around the same time as Lactatia (who turned out exactly as you'd expect, btw), so a lot of people on the internet were understandably angered. Shadman would even use the whole thing as an excuse to create more degenerate art (obviously not going to link that here).

After some sleuthing, primarily on 8chan /pol/, it was discovered that there were signs Schreiber had been abusing or allowing the abuse of his son for years through some odd social media posts and some extremely incriminating photographs captured by the paparazzi, perhaps most notably, this series of photos where his son appears to be imitating the act of fellatio using the handlebars of his scooter.

Now, here's where it gets a bit weirder.

That 4plebs thread is now pretty much the only place on the ENTIRE internet you can find those once-viral photos. Go ahead, try it. Try looking for those pictures through a surface web Google search. Any attempts at mirroring them on Imgur or another image hosting service would end up deleted.

Weeks after the controversy arose, Schreiber purchased a Vespa-type scooter to ride around on, which included giving his family members rides. As a result, anyone trying to look up "Liev Schreiber scooter" or "Liev Schreiber son scooter" in an attempt to locate the previously linked photos would instead be bombarded with photos of the actor on a Vespa. The photos of his son sucking the handlebars of his own scooter quickly disappeared to the point they practically don't exist anymore.

Fast forward eight years. Kai Schreiber is now a young "trans female" model signed to a model agency and already has a significant following. Heshe will likely be the next Hunter Schafer once that one offs itself or hits the troon wall, and could even eclipse his father in terms of fame.

One thing to notice in those new, post-troonsition photos is how lifeless Kai's face is. Just the same vacant, dead stare. Almost as if he realized what was going on in his childhood that lead him to what he is today.

Everything a child does while growing up has to be learned from somewhere. Where did Samuel Kai Schreiber learn to wrap his mouth around the handlebars of his scooter, and how?

Looking back through GG history (as well as I can, since it seems Deepfreeze is never going to get fixed...), it's curious how long we tried to affirm a moral high ground when it was clear the lying press were content to paint whatever picture they wanted. Didn't matter how many women, coloreds, or colored women of color tweeted "#NotYourShield", GamerGate was only ever about "angry white male rage". Honey Badgers and Sad Puppies fell on deaf ears and only made the press hate us more for pointing out their hypocrisy. We teamed up with "good fags" and "good feminists" like Milo and CHS and the only thing it ever achieved was excommunicate them from their in-groups before they eventually dumped us further down the line.

It also didn't help that the GG movement was being strangled for years thanks to control of the 8chan board by Acid Man following Niko's capitulation to the Ayy Team. Cole Lamberson's obsession with "muh pr" tanked the entire movement and stalled genuine discoveries such as Seattle4Truth uncovering the money trail between the Literal Whos and big organizations like Microsoft, even if he went totally insane in the end and committed matricide.

What happened over the next decade was virtually an entire generation becoming politically active in a way that hasn't happened since the Vietnam War. Two US elections won, Pizzagate exposed to the world, trannies banned from sports, populism movements sprouting up all over the world, and it was all because we only ever wanted to play video games and be left in peace.

So I ask you - if we had our 2025 mindset back in 2014, would you have skipped the #NotYourShield part of our movement entirely and just got straight to shutting out troons, fags and general SJWs? If not, why?