Clever, and you're probably right. It'll be laundered back to Trudeau through lesbian feminist leaders who donate to the Liberal party.
Because I'll be proven right. Again. Nobody ever goes back and checks if I was right on these things. This week validated literally everything I have been saying. The left deserted the gays, women's organizations admitted using financial pressure to push men out of work, TERFs got on the media's good side.
Remember when I said everyone would fall in line with the women's movement when it came down to it?
-
Pride under attack
-
Soros, Ford Foundation drop support for LGBT causes, raise their commitment to women
-
AP puts out guidelines on how to fairly report on TERFs
Here's an interesting fact, not for any reason at all. The person who led the first meeting of what became the WEF had the same surname (Galbraith) as Rowling's alter ego.
Downvotes don't change that I was right.
Now you're just being contrarian. But I made one with Trump and DeSimptis if you prefer.
Did DeSantis make fox be pro faggot somehow?
How many Fox shares does Citadel Securities hold?
I genuinely don't know, it'll be in their 13F at the end of this month.
Will you apologize when the suit abruptly fails and he endorses DeSimptis in the primary?
I've noticed the enemy's tactics regarding plants have gotten way smarter. They now fake a rift between the plant and the establishment to give them more credibility.
How many women's sports shills can I make mad with this one?
You can call it sport, but it's a cheap imitation, like a Nokia with a glued on Apple logo being called an iPhone.
Repeal Title IX, end women's sports, end the fascination with women's non-issues and fight against women's attacks on male employability.
Tucker wasn't fired. He was re-positioned where he'd be more effective for DeSimptis.
Matt Walsh is a DeSimp at best and a WEF shill at worst.
How can I improve it?
Mary Barra is current CEO of Government Motors and was considered as HRC's VP.
Member of the Disney board of directors in 2022.
What's wrong with it? I think it's accurate.
Women constantly show the "success" they achieve to impressionable boys and then feminist predators indoctrinate them into a woman worshipping cult that's guaranteed to end in suicide.
It fits both male feminists and castration victims.
That makes more sense. Women can just shack up with the invaders as they always do.
Can't tell if sarcasm...
I don't own editing software, I just pasted text.
You should know, I don't usually make memes.
military aged male
Fuck off simp, men can be suffering too.
That study is fake as fuck. Even Redditors saw through it.
They conflated abuse and self defense with loaded questions like
"Is it okay to hit a woman in any circumstances"
The answer is yes, of course - when my life is in danger.
It's actually disturbing that 70% of young men think a woman trying to kill them should just be allowed to.
$10 says most goes to the L.
It's logical. If a woman can kill a baby and it's not a life, someone who flattens a pregnant woman with their car while texting didn't kill the baby, because it's not a life.
The way it is now is effectively just saying "women define what a life is".
Despite everything that's happened this week? I mean, this week has been a fast redpill on the true intent of the enemy.
I'm cutting out a group that doesn't affect others. If you're not in a gang, you don't care about them killing each other.
It's like including suicides in gun deaths. Completely irrational.
Why don't women want us to know who is most likely to commit a random killing in the UK?
No, it really isn't.
Is everyone shilling birth rates a traditionalist?
First I want you to define a traditionalist so you can't play games.
You cannot be serious.
It's his funeral, not mine. I suppose he has money for all the lawyers.
You're missing the point, women's sport is a crude, low-quality imitation of men's sport.