-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +1 / -14

I'm not sure what this conversation even is. You called me dumb for believing in innocence until found guilty. It's like MeToo all over again and nobody's learned the lessons from that one either.

The woman who owns that site literally has me blocked on X for talking about female pedophiles and how a lot of prominent TERF cults are full of people who justify pedophilia.

-18
TheImpossible1 -18 points ago +1 / -19

They haven't put a woman in charge of the company (yet) so I'm going to enjoy it while that's the case.

-15
TheImpossible1 -15 points ago +1 / -16

That's not true. Besides, this is different, you don't have to analyse press releases and financial reports like I do to know JK Rowling is our enemy.

-14
TheImpossible1 -14 points ago +1 / -15

I'm not a hypocrite. I'm just pointing out a trend of my opponents being unironic followers of women's favorite political ideology.

Still my favorite thing is when your side claim under Nazism, women would be better people.

No, they wouldn't. Followers of Nazism were mostly first wave feminists, the fucking Pankhursts were the main campaigners for an alliance with Nazi Germany in the UK.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +1 / -10

It's an ideology considered by the vast majority as evil and there's a large amount of sources showing how much women (especially prominent feminists) supported it.

In short, speaking of women's love for fascism is the best argument against a normie.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

I disagree that is the case. I think it's a desperate attempt to delay the inevitable death spiral of the welfare state.

Social Security is untenable. It's already looking like funding for it has to be raised, and they're already pushing a ton of debt onto the next generation.

They kicked the can too far down the road to the point that they "owe" the existence of these future generations to stay solvent.

Can you take the fight to women? Of course not. They'll vote out anyone who tries, and their feelings towards the other half of the population won't change even if the law did. We see that in places where women are "oppressed" that frequently flare up on that issue, like Iran.

-14
TheImpossible1 -14 points ago +2 / -16

but specifically don't want to fix it because those with power see the decreasing white population as a positive.

Starting with a false premise should make this fun for me.

The issue of births is 100% an issue of women. If you want more children you must enforce moral behavior onto women that promotes children.

No, making women pretend to be good won't help.

The simplest one-trick way to raise birth rates is to stop having women go to school.

Also the easiest way to have a perpetual leech class that has no value...also, who will teach the kids in this tradcon retard world? The father works, the mother is stupid.

Tradcons oppose men working in education.

That means those with power do not care about birth rates. Any propaganda pretending they do is a controlled narrative to pretend they care.

They want capable people who can provide tax income. It's not rocket science.

Something has to prop up social security. That's all it's really about. The welfare state is going to collapse soon if they don't borderline enslave free men to uncaring women who just want their money.

The system is built on perpetual growth, and it only works if that continues. Current gender relations almost certainly will not improve. Enter the world's stupidest plan.

Push the rehabilitation of feminists' image with the TERF bullshit. See, they're good people, they oppose the trannies, never mind that it was feminism that fucking created it.

Have all the entertainers go on indefinite strikes. No entertainment, maybe you'll give them a chance out of sheer boredom.

Ban free pornography as much as possible, while keeping women's racket running. No porn, maybe your desires will overwhelm you and you'll get trapped.

It wouldn't surprise me if the weird focus on keeping men out of work isn't being backed by the elite as a way to force us to tolerate women's hatred in our lives because we need their money to live.

-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +2 / -15

They never have been. Not in our lifetime.

We can consider, they'll fight with their neutered tradcon purse puppies to the last breath to stop it.

The plan is to take away everything and force you to give them a chance. I wouldn't piss on them if they were on fire, but I'm sure it'll work on mentally weaker people.

-17
TheImpossible1 -17 points ago +3 / -20

all entertainment is shutting down under a woman's lead

all right wing media is shilling a birth rate "crisis"

porn bans are being enacted all over the US

Balenciaga (Kering Foundation) bought out the CAA

thinking emoji

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +3 / -13

No, it's because it was a piece of shit that made a feminist even richer, so she could spend that money on stripping your human rights.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +2 / -10

I mean, they both lead the same way. The position is consistent.

The left tells the right it's racist to have kids.

The controlled opposition right tells the right it's important to have kids.

I'm just surprised they didn't mention immigration in the article.

I'm not.

-18
TheImpossible1 -18 points ago +1 / -19

Because this shit single handedly funded feminist operations in 2023.

It's not hard to abide by "don't fund your enemy" yet people still fucking failed.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +2 / -10

Interesting fact, the Daily Mail and the Suffragettes were both supportive of the British Union of Fascists.


Reminds me of all the other "crisis" issues that were brought up.

Climate, Covid and all the other lies.

Fuck off, worse halves.

-16
TheImpossible1 -16 points ago +1 / -17

I don't think anyone cares what race has more kids. The race argument is a cover for women's continued unjust advancement.

They want us divided so we don't try and stop their ill-gotten gains.

-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +1 / -14

women don't want you to be tied to 18 years of child support

I don't know what retard layer you're on either.

-19
TheImpossible1 -19 points ago +1 / -20

No it's not? Fortnite overtook it on top grossing after a few days, and MW2 overtook it on top sellers after a week.

It was a flash in the pan, bought by morons obsessed with a kids' book and sad political types who thought they were "owning the feminist trannies" by wasting money on garbage.

-17
TheImpossible1 -17 points ago +3 / -20

I thought I already did.

Women have tried asking, shaming and attacking men for not wanting children. I surely don't need to document the various articles on this topic. Even Elon talks about "raising birth rates".

None of it works. The birth rate continues to fall because nobody wants to be tied into a rigged contract...

So now, they're trying to use entities they know we hate, to push against the idea, in an effort to claim "the elite don't want you to have kids".

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +3 / -9

I maintain that the UK is worse. It's literally legal to murder your partner there.

How to say this without getting R16'd...

It's always about either power or money. They don't care about anything else.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +7 / -8

The true level of crazy in Spain is that women had a rally for feminism in 2020 while everyone else was locking down.

Not only did the PSOE government not stop them, they attended!

A demand for the feminist organizers to be held accountable for the Covid deaths that came after was made in 2021 and swiftly dismissed.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +8 / -11

Yes. Women pushed that society needs "role models" for women to enter the hard sciences.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›